BUS3041 WK 4 Project

BUS3041 Week 4 Project Rubric Course: BUS3041-Managerial Communications SU02

Criteria No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F through D range) (1–13) 13 points

Satisfactory (C range) (14– 15) 15 points

Proficient (B range) (16–17) 17 points

Exemplary (A range) (18–20) 20 points

Criterion Score

Justified audience

analysis for the

presentation.

/ 20Did not identify

audience.

Unsupported with

research.

Identified audience.

Lacked credible research

support.

Described audience.

Weakly supported with

research.

Justified audience

analysis for the

presentation.

Sufficiently supported

with research.

Justification of audience

analysis for the

presentation was

compelling and showed

well-developed logical

progression.

Well supported by

research.

Criteria No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F through D range) (1–13) 13 points

Satisfactory (C range) (14– 15) 15 points

Proficient (B range) (16–17) 17 points

Exemplary (A range) (18–20) 20 points

Criterion Score

Proposed a detailed

outline of the main

points of your

presentation.

/ 20Did not identify main

points.

Unsupported with

research.

Identified main points.

Lacked credible research

support.

Described main points.

Weakly supported with

research.

Proposed detailed outline

of the main points of

your presentation.

Sufficiently supported

with research.

Proposal of detailed

outline of the main

points of your

presentation was

compelling and showed

well-developed logical

progression.

Well supported by

research.

Criteria No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F through D range) (1–6) 6 points

Satisfactory (C range) (7) 7 points

Proficient (B range) (8) 8 points

Exemplary (A range) (9–10) 10 points

Criterion Score

Total / 50

Overall Score

Criteria No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F through D range) (1–6) 6 points

Satisfactory (C range) (7) 7 points

Proficient (B range) (8) 8 points

Exemplary (A range) (9–10) 10 points

Criterion Score

Wrote in a clear,

concise, and organized

manner; demonstrated

ethical scholarship in

accurate representation

and attribution of

sources (i.e., APA); and

displayed accurate

spelling, grammar, and

punctuation.

Communication: Use of

tone, word choice,

audien

/ 10Submission contains no

discernible overall intent

in author’s selection of

ideas.

Errors in basic writing

conventions are

sufficiently numerous to

prevent reader

comprehension.

No attempt at

Academic/APA

formatting in

presentation

Submission contains

random presentation of

ideas, which prevents

understanding the

majority of author’s

overall intent.

Errors in basic writing

conventions are

sufficiently numerous to

prevent reader

comprehension of

majority of the work.

Academic/APA format is

attempted, but errors are

significant.

Ideas are presented in a

way that forces the

reader to make repeated

inferences in order to

identify and follow the

author’s overall intent.

Errors in basic writing

conventions interfere

with, but do not prevent,

reader comprehension.

Academic/APA format is

attempted but errors are

distracting.

The reader can follow the

author’s overall intent as

stated.

The reader noticed a few

errors in basic writing

conventions but these

few errors do not

interfere with reader

comprehension.

Using Academic/APA

format, accurately. Errors

are noticeable but minor.

The writer’s overall

argument and language

are clear and tightly

focused, leaving the

reader with no room for

confusion about author’s

intent.

Text is basically error

free, so that a reader

would have to purposely

search to find any errors

that may be present.

Using Academic/APA

format proficiently. Text

is basically error free.

No Submission 0 points minimum

Emerging (F through D range) 1 point minimum

Satisfactory (C range) 35 points minimum

Proficient (B range) 40 points minimum

Exemplary (A range) 45 points minimum