NURS686

profileheidy0422
Week4paperinstructions.docx

Rewatch the same  Patient Interview . This time, you will focus on writing the diagnosis and differential discussion. The discussion should include the following sections:  

· A summary of findings 

· Psychodynamic formulation 

· Primary diagnosis with ICD code

· Prognosis

· Plan including medications, labs, therapy, patient education, follow up, non-pharmacological treatments 

An example is outlined on page 24 of Kaplan & Sadock’s Synopsis of Psychiatry textbook. 

Rubric

Psychiatric Report: Impression: Diagnosis/Differentials

Psychiatric Report: Impression: Diagnosis/Differentials

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssessment & Diagnoses

15 pts

Proficient

Identifies the most appropriate primary diagnosis and ICD code for the patient presented in the scenario. Identifies all additional psychiatric and medical diagnoses presented in the scenario.

11.25 pts

Acceptable

The primary diagnosis and ICD code identified is similar to the most appropriate diagnosis. At least one additional psychiatric and medical diagnosis presented in the scenario was identified.

7.5 pts

Needs Improvement

The primary diagnosis and ICD code identified is vague or not similar to the most appropriate diagnosis. The additional psychiatric and medical diagnosis presented in the scenario was not correct.

3.75 pts

Unsatisfactory

The primary diagnosis and ICD code identified is not correct for the patient presented in the scenario. No additional psychiatric or medical diagnoses presented in the scenario were identified.

0 pts

Missing

No primary diagnoses, ICD code, secondary, or medical diagnoses were given.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDifferential Diagnoses

15 pts

Proficient

Identifies at least 2 appropriate differential diagnoses for the patient presented in the scenario.

11.25 pts

Acceptable

Identifies at least 1 appropriate differential diagnosis for the patient presented in the scenario.

7.5 pts

Needs Improvement

Identifies at least 1 differential diagnosis that is not clearly related to the patient presented in the scenario.

3.75 pts

Unsatisfactory

The differential diagnosis presented is incorrect or is unrelated to the patient presented in the scenario.

0 pts

Missing

Does not provide differential diagnoses.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeImpression

20 pts

Proficient

Provides a concise discussion of the of the diagnosis and supporting evidence. The differential diagnoses are presented. The treatment plan is logically presented.

15 pts

Acceptable

Provides a discussion of the of the diagnosis with some supporting evidence. The differential diagnoses may be presented. The treatment plan is briefly presented.

10 pts

Needs Improvement

The discussion of the diagnosis may be vague or lack supporting evidence. The differential diagnoses may not be presented. The treatment plan is not clearly presented.

5 pts

Unsatisfactory

The discussion of the diagnosis is unclear and lacks supporting evidence. The differential diagnoses are not presented. The treatment plan is incorrect and is not clearly presented.

0 pts

Missing

No impression provided .

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePlan- Medications & Labs

20 pts

Proficient

Describes a detailed plan for medications and laboratory orders that are clearly related to the primary diagnosis. The medications include all prescribing details.

15 pts

Acceptable

Describes a detailed plan for medications and laboratory orders. There may be areas that are vague or not clearly relevant to the primary diagnosis.

10 pts

Needs Improvement

Describes a general plan for medications and laboratory orders. There are several key missing details or items not relevant to the primary diagnosis.

5 pts

Unsatisfactory

Describes a general plan for medications and laboratory orders that is incorrect for the primary diagnosis.

0 pts

Missing

No medications and laboratory provided.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePlan- Therapy, Education, Follow up, Non- Pharmacological

20 pts

Proficient

Provides an individualized plan that addresses all sections with evidence-based interventions for the identified primary diagnosis: therapy, education, follow up/ referrals, and non-pharmacologic interventions.

15 pts

Acceptable

Most sections of the plan are addressed.

10 pts

Needs Improvement

Some sections of the plan are addressed.

5 pts

Unsatisfactory

Most sections of the plan are not addressed.

0 pts

Missing

No therapy, education, follow up/ referrals, and non-pharmacologic interventions are provided.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization

5 pts

Proficient

All data and information is placed in the correct section of the note. The note is well organized and clear.

3.75 pts

Acceptable

Minor mistakes in placement of information and data. The note is mostly organized and clear.

2.5 pts

Needs Improvement

Several mistakes in placement of information and data that impact the organization and clarity of the note.

1.25 pts

Unsatisfactory

Numerous mistakes in placement of information. The note is not well organized and is difficult to understand.

0 pts

Missing

Information unreadable, multiple mistakes in organization of data, information is unclear.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTerminology

5 pts

Proficient

Appropriate use of medical terminology. No grammar/ spelling mistakes.

3.75 pts

Acceptable

Minor mistakes with terminology, spelling or grammar.

2.5 pts

Needs Improvement

Several mistakes with terminology, spelling or grammar.

1.25 pts

Unsatisfactory

Frequent mistakes with terminology, spelling or grammar that impact the reader’s ability to understand the note.

0 pts

Missing

Information is unreadable, multiple mistakes, and the information is unclear.

5 pts

Total Points: 100

IV.  Summary of Findings

Summarize mental symptoms, medical and laboratory findings, and psychological and neurologic test results, if available; include medications patient has been taking, dosage, duration. Clarity of thinking is reflected in clarity of writing. When summarizing the mental status (e.g., the phrase “Patient denies hallucinations and delusions” is not as precise as “Patient denies hearing voices or thinking that he is being followed.”). The latter indicates the specific question asked and the specific response given. Similarly, in the conclusion of the report one would write “Hallucinations and delusions were not elicited.”

V.  Diagnosis

Diagnostic classification is made according to DSM-5. The diagnostic numerical code should be used from DSM-5 or ICD-10. It might be prudent to use both codes to cover current and future regulatory guidelines.

VI.  Prognosis

Opinion about the probable future course, extent, and outcome of the disorder; good and bad prognostic factors; specific goals of therapy

VII.  Psychodynamic Formulation

Causes of the patient’s psychodynamic breakdown—influences in the patient’s life that contributed to present disorder; environmental, genetic, and personality factors relevant to determining patient’s symptoms; primary and secondary gains; outline of the major defense mechanism used by the patient

VIII.  Comprehensive Treatment Plan

Modalities of treatment recommended, role of medication, inpatient or outpatient treatment, frequency of sessions, probable duration of therapy; type of psychotherapy; individual, group, or family therapy; symptoms or problems to be treated. Initially, treatment must be directed toward any life-threatening situations such as suicidal risk or risk of danger to others that require psychiatric hospitalization. Danger to self or others is an acceptable reason (both legally and medically) for involuntary hospitalization. In the absence of the need for confinement, a variety of outpatient treatment alternatives are available: day hospitals, supervised residences, outpatient psychotherapy or pharmacotherapy, among others. In some cases, treatment planning must attend to vocational and psychosocial skills training and even legal or forensic issues.

Comprehensive treatment planning requires a therapeutic team approach using the skills of psychologists, social workers, nurses, activity and occupational therapists, and a variety of other mental health professionals, with referral to self-help groups (e.g., Alcoholics Anonymous [AA]) if needed. If either the patient or family members are unwilling to accept the recommendations of treatment and the clinician thinks that the refusal of the recommendations may have serious consequences, the patient, parent, or guardian should sign a statement to the effect that the recommended treatment was refused.