Preparedness & Disaster Mgmt

Excellent

100%

Very Good

90%

Good 

80%

Fair

70%

Failing

0%

Subject Knowledge/ Comprehension

Weight 20%

Demonstrates full knowledge of the plan (more than required) of operational methodology and components.

Is at ease with plan operation and all components.

Is uncomfortable with information about the plan.

Does not grasp plan except in most simplistic terms.

No know-ledge demonstrated

Presentation techniques

Weight 20%

Presentation flows; student spoke clearly and distinctly all the time, was completely prepared for and has rehearsed their part of the presentation.

Presentation mostly flows; student spoke clearly and distinctly most of the time and was relatively prepared for presentation.

Presentation somewhat flows. Student spoke clearly and distinctly some of the time. Mispronounced some words.

Student was somewhat prepared but rehearsal was lacking.

Presentation was difficult to follow. Student often mumbled or could not be understood. Student did not seem at all prepared to present. 

Presentation was unacceptable and entirely unclear; student was not prepared or not present.

Visual Aids

Weight 20%

Presentation of plan is professional and visual aids appropriate to the subject matter.

Slides are not crowded and formatting is sound.

Presentation is professional, but visual aids are limited. Slides mostly well-done without excessive crowding.

Visual aids are neither geographic, nor subject matter specific.

Presentation is spotty at best. Slides are not well-formatted.

Poor presentation with few visual aids.

Presentation is not professional and no visual aids provided.

Discussion / Contribution to in class learning

Weight 20%

Frequently

attempts to motivate

the group discussion;

presents creative

approaches to topic and able to correctly answer almost all questions.

Frequently attempts to direct the discussion and

to present relevant

viewpoints for

consideration by group.

Interacts freely and able to correctly answer most questions.

Occasionally makes

meaningful attempts to involve group.

Student could accurately answer a few questions posed about the topic.

Does not make effort to engage with class.

Student could accurately answer few questions about the topic.

No contribution. Student could not accurately answer questions about the topic.

Length of Presentation

Weight 20%

Student spoke for appropriate amount of time for presentation.

Student spoke a little more or a little less than appropriate amount allotted for presentation.

Student spoke a lot more or a lot less than other peers in the group.

Student monopolized the allotted time for the presentation or spoke hardly at all.

Student conduct was inappropriate for a presentation or student was missing.