Essay III
PinkPantherGurl
Week4-FindingPartners.docxRunning Head: FINDING PARTNERS 1
FINDING PARTNERS 3
You clearly identify assignment option 1 in your title. You identify the assigned 10 potential types of partners for your community plan, but you fail to name specific individuals or organizations or to provide email or website info for any of them. The listed partner types appear to be appropriate to help you, and you explain enough about their missions to understand how they might benefit from working with you. It is clearly written, and I appreciate that you organized the info on each potential partner into a separate numbered paragraph. APA is perfect.
Feedback:
Finding Partners
Mara Coper
Potential Partners and Stakeholders willing to help in implementation of local community plan
1. State government of Columbus. The government would help in formulation of policies that will see the community plan intercept the progression in a forward mannerism. The state government will form a unique basis of the steering committee which will make sure that the rules and regulations provided under the State Laws are adhered to.
2. Steering committee of the community plan. The committee will be responsible of steering the developments and will be assigned the duties to develop and come up with the vision and mission statements which will be key essentials for the organization (Halla, F., & Majani, 2019). The committee will partner with the developers to make sure all planning is profit and customer oriented.
3. Non-governmental organizations. The NGO’s will form a unique base of partnerships as they will be used to formulate and fund policies (Nastasi.et.al, 2020). Their supportive measures in advising and coordinating the service delivery for the community plan through funding initiatives that are responsible for positive progression of the plan in an extensive manner.
4. The coordinating partners are the executive bodies that run coordination of projects in efforts to plan and form coalitions with other activities in the long run. The body will play an important role in coordinating the program for implementation of the community plan (Millar, 2016). Basically, the partners modify the objectives and set aside achievable strategies for the community plan undertaking.
5. Board of directors who are important for the implementation and provision of support both technical and advisory to determine the potential of success and resource allocation for the community plan. The directors are important in detecting the aspects of coordination and management of finances for the initiation of the community plan.
6. Public health officials. The partnership with the public health departments will ensure that the policies and basis of operations for the community plan are determined to allow for much compliance with the health and state rules and regulations. The officials will successfully run and implement the community development plan as a way to give back.
7. Churches. The charitable actions of the church and its followers to helping people living in the community will act as a way to facilitate trust and commitment in helping the needy (Leach.et.al, 2020). The actions and role played by the charitable actions will generally facilitate a positive run in the development and initiation of the community plan.
8. Neighboring colleges and universities. The movements and other bodies (organizations) formed by students in the town might also be interested in engaging on charitable actions. The students will coordinate and engage in the development of the community plan as they will provide cheap and easily accessible resources.
9. Businesses within the city that are interested in funding the project in order to make the community plan a success will play an important role in steering the community plan forward to achieve its key roles and establishments (Harrison, J. S., & St. John, 2016). Interested business people can give back to the society in terms of funding and issuing resources for the development of the community plan.
10. Special organizations and departments in the city that deal with charitable work can also operate to form unique compliance with the community plan developers in order to steer the project forward.
Halla, F., & Majani, B. (2019). Innovative ways for solid waste management in Dar-Es-Salaam: toward stakeholder partnerships. Habitat International, 23(3), 351-361. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/s0197-3975(98)00057-5
Harrison, J. S., & St. John, C. H. (2016). Managing and partnering with external stakeholders. Academy of Management Perspectives, 10(2), 46-60. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.1996.9606161554
Leach, W. D., Pelkey, N. W., & Sabatier, P. A. (2020). Stakeholder partnerships as collaborative policymaking: Evaluation criteria applied to watershed management in California and Washington. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management: The Journal of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management, 21(4), 645-670. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.10079
Millar, S. (2016). Stakeholders and community participation. In Managing world heritage sites (pp. 63-80). Routledge. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.10079 https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-7506-6546-9.50012-5
Nastasi, B. K., Varjas, K., Schensul, S. L., Silva, K. T., Schensul, J. J., & Ratnayake, P. (2020). The Participatory Intervention Model: A framework for conceptualizing and promoting intervention acceptability. School Psychology Quarterly, 15(2), 207. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.10079
