Patient-Centered Care Report

CRITERIA

NON-PERFORMANCE

BASIC

PROFICIENT

DISTINGUISHED

Evaluate the outcomes of a population health improvement initiative.

Does not describe the outcomes of a population health improvement initiative.

Describes but does not evaluate the outcomes of a population health improvement initiative.

Evaluates the outcomes of a population health improvement initiative.

Evaluates the outcomes of a population health improvement initiative. Identifies knowledge gaps, unknowns, missing information, unanswered questions, or areas of uncertainty (where further information could improve the evaluation).

Propose a strategy for improving the outcomes of a population health improvement initiative, or for ensuring that all outcomes are being addressed, based on the best available evidence.

Does not propose a strategy for improving the outcomes of a population health improvement initiative, or for ensuring that all outcomes are being addressed, based on the best available evidence.

Proposes a strategy that is not useful for improving outcomes or ensuring that all outcomes are being addressed, or the strategy is not based on the best available evidence.

Proposes a strategy for improving the outcomes of a population health improvement initiative, or for ensuring that all outcomes are being addressed, based on the best available evidence.

Proposes a strategy for improving the outcomes of a population health improvement initiative, or for ensuring that all outcomes are being addressed, based on the best available evidence. Acknowledges challenges in the proposed strategy.

Develop an approach to personalizing patient care that incorporates lessons learned from a population health improvement initiative.

Does not develop an individualized personal care approach that incorporates lessons learned from a population health improvement plan.

Develops an approach to personalizing patient care that does not clearly incorporate lessons learned from a population health improvement plan.

Develops an approach to personalizing patient care that incorporates lessons learned from a population health improvement initiative.

Develops an approach to personalizing patient care that incorporates lessons learned from a population health improvement initiative, and identifies assumptions on which the approach is based.

Justify the value and relevance of evidence used to support an approach to personalizing patient care.

Does not justify the value and relevance of evidence used to support an approach to personalizing patient care.

Presents a weak justification of the value and relevance of evidence used to support an approach to personalizing patient care.

Justifies the value and relevance of evidence used to support an approach to personalizing patient care.

Justifies the value and relevance of evidence used to support an approach to personalizing patient care. Identifies knowledge gaps, unknowns, missing information, unanswered questions, or areas of uncertainty (where further information could improve the personalized concept map).

Propose a framework for evaluating the outcomes of an approach to personalizing patient care and determining what aspects of the approach could be applied to similar situations and patients.

Does not propose a framework for evaluating the outcomes of an approach to personalizing patient care and determining what aspects of the approach could be applied to similar situations and patients.

Attempts to propose a framework for evaluating the outcomes of an approach to personalizing patient care, but proposed criteria are not measurable or not relevant, or aspects of the approach are not likely to be transferable to other cases.

Proposes a framework for evaluating the outcomes of an approach to personalizing patient care and determining what aspects of the approach could be applied to similar situations and patients.

Proposes a framework for evaluating the outcomes of an approach to personalizing patient care and determining what aspects of the approach could be applied to similar situations and patients. Acknowledges the limitations of the proposal.

Write clearly and logically, with correct grammar and mechanics.

Does not write clearly and logically, with correct grammar and mechanics.

Writing is not consistently clear and logical, or errors in grammar and mechanics detract from the message.

Writes clearly and logically, with correct grammar and mechanics.

Writes clearly, logically, and persuasively; grammar and mechanics are error-free.

Integrate relevant and credible sources of evidence to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style.

Does not integrate relevant and credible sources of evidence to support assertions; does not correctly format citations and references using APA style.

Sources lack relevance or credibility, are poorly integrated, or are incorrectly formatted.

Integrates relevant and credible sources of evidence to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style.

Integrates relevant and credible sources of evidence to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style. Citations are error-free.