HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH PROTECTION

NRSE 4550 RUBRIC: MODULE 3: ASSESSMENT 6: WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT – HUMAN SUBJECTS PROTECTION (30 pts)

Last updated: 10/09/2018 © 2018 School of Nursing Ohio University Page 1 of 1

Criteria Accomplished Proficient Poor Not Acceptable

2 Peer-Reviewed

References are provided in

correct APA format

5 to 5 Points

References are correctly

referenced in proper APA

6th ed. format

3 to 4 Points

2 references provided;

References have less than 2

APA errors

1 to 2 Points

Only 1 reference is

provided or references

have 2-3 APA errors

0 to 0 Points

Reference is NOT in APA

format or has more than 3

errors

Essential elements of

informed consent are

discussed

5 to 5 Points

3 or more key elements of

informed consent are

discussed.

3 to 4 Points

Most key elements of

informed consent are

discussed, but one key

element is missing.

1 to 2 Points

Less than 3 key elements

are discussed

0 to 2 Points

Key elements of informed

consent not addressed.

Special vulnerable

populations in research

are identified and

discussed

7 to 8 Points

Correctly identifies the type

of studies and provides an

appropriate explanation

5 to 6 Points

Correctly identifies 3 or more

vulnerable research

populations, but discussion is

lacking.

3 to 4 Points

Correctly identifies 3 or

more vulnerable research

populations, but does not

fully discuss; Identifies

only 2 vulnerable

research populations.

0 to 2 Points

Correctly identifies 1 or

fewer vulnerable research

populations; fails to discuss

vulnerable populations in

research

Discusses the role of the

nurse in advocating for

the patient in research

situations

7 to 7 Points

Provides a full, in-depth

discussion of the role of the

nurse in advocating for the

patient in research

4 to 6 Points

Provides an adequate

discussion of the role of the

nurse in advocating for the

patient in research, but is

somewhat lacking.

2 to 4 Points

Provides a superficial

discussion of the role of

the nurse in advocating

for the patient in research

0 to 1 Points

Provides no discussion or

lacks a logical discussion of

the role of the nurse in

advocating for the patient in

research.

Discussion is well-written

and free of grammatical

and mechanical errors

(Does not include APA)

5 to 5 Points

Provides a well-written

discussion, free of

grammatical and

mechanical areas.

3 to 4 Points

Provides a mostly well-written

discussion with fewer than 3

grammatical and mechanical

errors.

1 to 2 Points

Provides a fair or poor

discussion with 3-4

grammatical and

mechanical errors.

0 to 0 Points

Discussion is poorly written;

illogical; difficult or

impossible to read; Includes

5 or more grammatical or

mechanical errors