BUS4101 Week 3 Project

BUS4101 Week 3 Project Rubric Course: BUS4101-Quality Management SU01

Criteria No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F through D Range) (6-7) 7 points

Satisfactory (C Range) (7-8) 8 points

Proficient (B Range) (8-9) 9 points

Exemplary (A Range) (9-10) 10 points

Criterion Score

Summarized

details the

company and

the product or

service being

analyzed.

/ 10Did not identify

the company or

the product in

any way.

Unsupported

with research.

Identified

company or

product.

Lacked credible

research support.

Described

company and

product.

Weakly

supported with

research.

Summarized brief

details about

company and the

product or

service being

analyzed.

Sufficiently

supported with

research.

Summarized

thorough details

of the product or

service and the

company that

provides it.

Well supported

by research.

Criteria No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F through D Range) (12-14) 14 points

Satisfactory (C Range) (14-16) 16 points

Proficient (B Range) (16-18) 18 points

Exemplary (A Range) (18-20) 20 points

Criterion Score

Criteria No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F through D Range) (12-14) 14 points

Satisfactory (C Range) (14-16) 16 points

Proficient (B Range) (16-18) 18 points

Exemplary (A Range) (18-20) 20 points

Criterion Score

Analyzed what

quality means

in the context

of the selected

organization

and the

product or the

service.

/ 20Did not identify

quality.

Unsupported

with research.

Identified quality.

Lacked credible

research support.

Described

quality.

Weakly

supported with

research.

Analyzed what

quality means in

the context of

the selected

organization and

the product or

the service.

Sufficiently

supported with

research.

Offered a

compelling

analysis of what

quality would

mean for this

company and its

product or

service.

Well supported

by research.

Criteria No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F through D Range) (18-21) 21 points

Satisfactory (C Range) (21-24) 24 points

Proficient (B Range) (24-27) 27 points

Exemplary (A Range) (27-30) 30 points

Criterion Score

Criteria No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F through D Range) (18-21) 21 points

Satisfactory (C Range) (21-24) 24 points

Proficient (B Range) (24-27) 27 points

Exemplary (A Range) (27-30) 30 points

Criterion Score

Conducted a

SWOT analysis

of the

organization.

/ 30Did not identify

SWOT

components.

Unsupported

with research.

Identified SWOT

components.

Lacked credible

research support.

Described SWOT

components.

Weakly

supported with

research.

Conducted a

SWOT analysis

of the

organization.

Sufficiently

supported with

research.

Provided a

compelling

analysis of the

strengths,

weaknesses,

opportunities,

and threats that

characterize the

organization

under

consideration.

Well supported

by research.

Criteria No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F through D Range) (12-14) 14 points

Satisfactory (C Range) (14-16) 16 points

Proficient (B Range) (16-18) 18 points

Exemplary (A Range) (18-20) 20 points

Criterion Score

Criteria No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F through D Range) (12-14) 14 points

Satisfactory (C Range) (14-16) 16 points

Proficient (B Range) (16-18) 18 points

Exemplary (A Range) (18-20) 20 points

Criterion Score

Justified a

method for

focusing the

organization's

attention on

quality.

/ 20Did not identify a

method.

Unsupported

with research.

Identified

method.

Lacked credible

research support.

Describe

method.

Weakly

supported with

research.

Justified a

method for

focusing the

organization’s

attention on

quality.

Sufficiently

supported with

research.

Justification of

method for

focusing the

attention of the

organization on

quality was

compelling.

Well supported

by research.

Criteria No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F through D Range) (12-14) 14 points

Satisfactory (C Range) (14-16) 16 points

Proficient (B Range) (16-18) 18 points

Exemplary (A Range) (18-20) 20 points

Criterion Score

Explained

what elements

of a quality

culture are

lacking within

the

organization.

/ 20Did not identify

elements.

Unsupported

with research.

Identified

elements.

Lacked credible

research support.

Described

elements.

Weakly

supported with

research.

Explained what

elements of a

quality culture

are lacking

within the

organization.

Sufficiently

supported with

research.

Offered a clear

explanation as to

what elements of

a quality culture

are lacking.

Well supported

by research.

Criteria No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F through D Range) (12-14) 14 points

Satisfactory (C Range) (14-16) 16 points

Proficient (B Range) (16-18) 18 points

Exemplary (A Range) (18-20) 20 points

Criterion ScoreCriteria No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F through D Range) (12-14) 14 points

Satisfactory (C Range) (14-16) 16 points

Proficient (B Range) (16-18) 18 points

Exemplary (A Range) (18-20) 20 points

Criterion Score

Evaluated who

the customers

of the

organization

are (external

and, when

appropriate,

internal).

/ 20Did not identify

customers.

Unsupported

with research.

Identified

customers.

Lacked credible

research support.

Described

customers.

Weakly

supported with

research.

Evaluated the

customers of the

organization.

Sufficiently

supported with

research.

Clearly evaluated

both internal and

external

customers of the

organization.

Well supported

by research.

Criteria No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F through D Range) (12-14) 14 points

Satisfactory (C Range) (14-16) 16 points

Proficient (B Range) (16-18) 18 points

Exemplary (A Range) (18-20) 20 points

Criterion Score

Recommended

a method of

implementing

changes in the

organization as

required by

customer

needs.

/ 20Did not identify

method.

Unsupported

with research.

Identified

method.

Lacked credible

research support.

Described

method.

Weakly

supported with

research.

Recommended a

method of

implementing

changes in the

organization.

Sufficiently

supported with

research.

Provided a

compelling

recommendation

as to what

method of

implementing

change should be

undertaken.

Well supported

by research.

Criteria No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F through D Range) (12-14) 14 points

Satisfactory (C Range) (14-16) 16 points

Proficient (B Range) (16-18) 18 points

Exemplary (A Range) (18-20) 20 points

Criterion ScoreCriteria No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F through D Range) (12-14) 14 points

Satisfactory (C Range) (14-16) 16 points

Proficient (B Range) (16-18) 18 points

Exemplary (A Range) (18-20) 20 points

Criterion Score

Recommended

potential

strategic

alliances that

might be made

to improve the

quality of the

organization's

product or

service.

/ 20Did not identify

alliances.

Unsupported

with research.

Identified

alliances.

Lacked credible

research support.

Described

alliances.

Weakly

supported with

research.

Recommended

strategic

alliances.

Sufficiently

supported with

research.

Provided

insightful

recommendation

s for strategic

alliances.

Well supported

by research.

Criteria No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F through D Range) (6-7) 7 points

Satisfactory (C Range) (7-8) 8 points

Proficient (B Range) (8-9) 9 points

Exemplary (A Range) (9-10) 10 points

Criterion Score

Communicatio

n: Use of tone,

word choice,

audience,

transitions,

and

progression of

ideas.

/ 10Submission

contained no

discernible

overall intent in

author’s

selection of

ideas.

Submission

contained

random

presentation of

ideas, which

prevented

understanding

the majority of

author’s overall

intent.

Ideas presented

in a way that

forced the reader

to make repeated

inferences in

order to identify

and follow the

author’s overall

intent.

The reader could

follow the

author’s overall

intent as stated.

The writer’s

overall argument

and language

were clear and

tightly focused,

leaving the

reader with no

room for

confusion about

author’s intent.

Criteria No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F through D Range) (6-7) 7 points

Satisfactory (C Range) (7-8) 8 points

Proficient (B Range) (8-9) 9 points

Exemplary (A Range) (9-10) 10 points

Criterion Score

Mechanics:

Use of

grammar,

sentence

structure, and

spelling.

/ 10Errors in basic

writing

conventions

were sufficiently

numerous to

prevent reader

comprehension.

Errors in basic

writing

conventions

were sufficiently

numerous to

prevent reader

comprehension

of majority of the

work.

Errors in basic

writing

conventions

interfered with,

but did not

prevent, reader

comprehension.

The reader

noticed a few

errors in basic

writing

conventions but

these few errors

did not interfere

with reader

comprehension.

Test was

basically error

free, so that a

reader would

have to

purposely search

to find any errors

that may be

present.

Criteria No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F through D Range) (12-14) 14 points

Satisfactory (C Range) (14-16) 16 points

Proficient (B Range) (16-18) 18 points

Exemplary (A Range) (18-20) 20 points

Criterion Score

Criteria No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F through D Range) (12-14) 14 points

Satisfactory (C Range) (14-16) 16 points

Proficient (B Range) (16-18) 18 points

Exemplary (A Range) (18-20) 20 points

Criterion Score

Academic/APA

/PPT

Formatting

Use of

citations,

references, and

structural

formatting

including such

elements as

title page,

running head,

page numbers,

headings, title

slides,

graphics, data,

notes section,

(as

appropriate),

introduction,

and conclusio

/ 20No attempt at

Academic/APA/P

PT formatting in

presentation.

Academic/APA/P

PT format

attempted, but

errors were

significant,

preventing

comprehension

of message.

Academic/APA/P

PT format

attempted but

errors were

distracting.

Weakly

supported with

research.

Used

Academic/APA/P

PT format

accurately. Errors

noticeable but

minor.

Used

Academic/APA/P

PT format

proficiently.

Work basically

error free.

Total / 200

Overall Score

No Submission 0 points minimum

Emerging (F through D Range) 140 points minimum

Satisfactory (C Range) 160 points minimum

Proficient (B Range) 180 points minimum

Exemplary (A Range) 200 points minimum