| Week 3 Supply and Demand Analysis: Presentation Grading Rubric |
| Requirements |
Possible Points |
Points Earned |
Criteria and Points |
|
|
|
| Excellent |
Competent |
Fair |
Poor |
Unacceptable |
| Introduction: Exhibits effective content and writing, including APA. Provides a clear identification of the commodity addressed and the supply and demand factors that have caused demand and supply to change. |
25 |
| Provides sufficient overview of commodity using sources in APA format |
Provides some overview of commodity using sources in APA format |
Attempts to provide overview of commodity but sources are not properly cited |
Insufficient overview and sources are not properly cited |
Does not state what commodity is being researched |
|
|
|
| 20–25 Points |
15–20 Points |
10-15 Points |
5–10 Points |
0–5 Points |
| Data: Appropriate level of content and data was used and data specifications met. Analysis and synthesis skills were applied to include a broad range of material, connecting theory with real data and/or experiences. |
50 |
| Sufficient historical and current data obtained from credible sources |
Current data obtained from credible sources, but data does not address all variables |
Data does not provide historical trends of the commodity |
Data does not provide historical trends of the commodity and data is not current |
Does not address the trends of the commodity's demand/supply and prices |
|
|
|
| 45–50 Points |
40–45 Points |
35–40 Points |
25–35 Points |
0–25 Points |
| Analysis: The creative process was applied where student formulated an identified challenge and was able to draw conclusions to develop scholarly thinking about problem or concept assigned. |
50 |
| Sufficient analysis of trends and causes of changes in all required variables |
Sufficient analysis of trends and causes of changes in some required variables |
Lacks clarity and does not highlight causes of changes in required variables |
Does not provide clear and cohesive analysis of trends and does not address causes of changes in variables |
Does not provide analysis of required market variables |
|
|
|
| 45–50 Points |
40–45 Points |
35–40 Points |
25–35 Points |
0–25 Points |
| Conclusion: Presentation shows critical thinking through the application of concepts learned in the module. |
25 |
| Shows critical thinking through the application of concepts learned in the module |
Shows critical thinking through the application of concepts learned in the module but does not fully link variables to each other |
Shows some understanding of variables but lacks clarity and cohesiveness in relating those variables to one another |
Provides some idea about the variables but lacks understanding of their relationship and effect on one another |
Does not demonstrate understanding of required variables |
|
|
|
| 20–25 Points |
15–20 Points |
10-15 Points |
5–10 Points |
0–5 Points |
| Total Points Earned |
150 |
0 |
| Revised: 09/04/2024 |
Omodiva18
Week3PresentationGradingRubric.xlsx
