Patho
Case Study 1
|
|
1 Unsatisfactory 0-71% 0.00% |
2 Less Than Satisfactory 72-75% 75.00% |
3 Satisfactory 76-79% 79.00% |
4 Good 80-89% 89.00% |
5 Excellent 90-100% 100.00% |
|
|
80.0 %Content |
|
|||||
|
40.0 % Accurate identification of anemia classification and rationale. |
Identification of anemia classification and rationale is not offered. |
Identification of anemia classification and rationale is offered, but incomplete, lacking relevant information, such as rationale. |
Identification of anemia classification and rationale meets the basic requirements of the assignment. |
Identification of anemia classification and rationale is offered in detail. |
Identification of anemia classification and rationale is offered in detail, while demonstrating evidence of deeper insight and/or reflection. |
|
|
40.0 % Explanation of patient diagnosis with rationale from case findings. Outside sources and/or medical and nursing references used to support conclusions. |
Explanation of patient diagnosis is not offered. |
Explanation of patient diagnosis is offered, but incomplete, lacking relevant information, or does not provide outside sources and/or medical and nursing references to support conclusions. |
Explanation of patient diagnosis uses outside sources and/or medical and nursing references to support conclusions, and meets the basic requirements of the assignment. |
Explanation of patient diagnosis uses outside sources and/or medical and nursing references to support conclusions and is offered in detail. |
Explanation of patient diagnosis uses outside sources and/or medical and nursing references to support conclusions and is offered in detail, while demonstrating evidence of deeper insight and/or reflection. |
|
|
15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness |
|
|||||
|
5.0 % Thesis Development and Purpose |
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. |
Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. |
Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. |
Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of arguments and appropriate to purpose. |
Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive; contained within the thesis is the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. |
|
|
5.0 % Paragraph Development and Transitions |
Paragraphs and transitions consistently lack unity and coherence. No apparent connections between paragraphs are established. Transitions are inappropriate to purpose and scope. Organization is disjointed. |
Some paragraphs and transitions may lack logical progression of ideas, unity, coherence, and/or cohesiveness. Some degree of organization is evident. |
Paragraphs are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other. |
A logical progression of ideas between paragraphs apparent. Paragraphs exhibit unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Topic sentences and concluding remarks are appropriate to purpose. |
There is a sophisticated construction of paragraphs and transitions. Ideas progress and relate to each other. Paragraph and transition construction guide the reader. Paragraph structure is seamless. |
|
|
5.0 % Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) |
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. |
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice, sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. |
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. |
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. |
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. |
|
|
5.0 %Format |
|
|||||
|
2.0 % Paper Format(1- inch margins;12-point-font;double-spaced;Times New Roman, Arial, or Courier) |
Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. |
Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent. |
Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. |
Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style. |
All format elements are correct. |
|
|
3.0 % Research Citations(In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment) |
No reference page is included. No citations are used. |
Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used. |
Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present. |
Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and GCU style is usually correct. |
In-text citations and a reference page are complete. The documentation of cited sources is free of error. |
|
|
100 % Total Weightage |
|
|