Week 4 Creating a Search Strategy

2

Evidence-Based Research Methods

Student Name

Institutional Affiliation

Course

Instructor’s Name

Date

Evidence-Based Research Methods

In conducting an evidence-based research study for the selected PICO question— “In African American males aged 18-30, how effective is the utilization of mindfulness meditation compared to traditional pharmacological treatments in managing symptoms of PTSD?”—various databases were consulted to collect the most relevant and high-quality information available. The databases searched include PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, CINAHL, and PsychINFO (Sun et al., 2022). Each database offers unique strengths: PubMed for its focus on life sciences and biomedical papers; Scopus for its comprehensive coverage of scientific, technical, medical, and social science research; Google Scholar for its extensive but non-specific coverage; CINAHL for nursing and allied health literature; and PsychINFO for its specialization in psychology and behavioral sciences.

Search terms were meticulously chosen to maximize the relevance of the results. Keywords such as "African American males," "PTSD," "mindfulness meditation," and "pharmacological treatments" were utilized both singularly and in combination, employing Boolean operators like AND and OR to refine the search (Dong et al., 2023). The search was initially broad to capture a comprehensive body of evidence. Then, it was fine-tuned through inclusion and exclusion criteria to ensure specificity to the research question.

Inclusion criteria

The inclusion criteria were constructed to ensure that the studies collected were directly pertinent to the research question. First, only peer-reviewed articles published in the last ten years were considered to ensure the most current and rigorously vetted information. Second, the studies had to focus explicitly on African-American males aged 18-30, aligning with the patient population specified in the PICO question. Third, the research had to concentrate either on mindfulness meditation or pharmacological treatments for PTSD (Possemato et al., 2022). Lastly, studies had to offer quantitative data comparing the efficacy of these treatments on PTSD symptoms.

Exclusion criteria

The exclusion criteria were also evident. Studies that did not offer a direct comparison between mindfulness meditation and traditional pharmacological treatments were ruled out, as the research aims to draw distinctions between these two interventions. Research focusing on populations other than African-American males aged 18-30 was excluded to maintain demographic specificity (Grupe et al., 2021). Also, articles published in non-peer-reviewed journals or those over ten years old were eliminated to maintain the research's scientific rigor and contemporary relevance.

The careful selection of databases, coupled with well-thought-out inclusion and exclusion criteria, ensured the collation of the most relevant and reliable body of evidence. This meticulous approach aligns with the advanced practice psychiatric nurses (PMHNPs) role in integrating the best available evidence into patient care (Sun et al., 2022). This evidence base will inform the comparison between mindfulness meditation and pharmacological treatments in managing PTSD symptoms among African American males aged 18-30, providing PMHNPs with valuable insights for more culturally sensitive and patient-centered care (Goldberg et al., 2020). This effort not only enhances healthcare delivery but also influences future research directions and healthcare policies aimed at this vulnerable demographic. Therefore, the chosen PICO question and the accompanying research methods serve as a significant contribution to evidence-based psychiatric care.

Conclusion

The meticulous selection of databases and the strategic application of inclusion and exclusion criteria have been instrumental in gathering robust, evidence-based research for the selected PICO question. This comprehensive approach ensures that the research will offer valuable insights into the effectiveness of mindfulness meditation versus traditional pharmacological treatments for managing PTSD in African-American males aged 18-30. The evidence gathered holds the potential to inform and transform practice among psychiatric mental health nurse practitioners, offering more patient-centered, culturally sensitive, and effective treatment options for this vulnerable demographic.

References

Dong, S., Campbell, A., Shadden, P., & Massie, J. D. (2023). Racial identity and mindfulness as predictors of Posttraumatic Growth in Black Adults Experiencing Race-Based Trauma.  International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling, pp. 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10447-023-09509-0

Goldberg, S. B., Riordan, K. M., Sun, S., Kearney, D. J., & Simpson, T. L. (2020). Efficacy and acceptability of mindfulness-based interventions for military veterans: A systematic review and meta-analysis.  Journal of psychosomatic research,  p. 138, 110232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2020.110232

Grupe, D. W., McGehee, C., Smith, C., Francis, A. D., Mumford, J. A., & Davidson, R. J. (2021). Mindfulness training reduces PTSD symptoms and improves stress-related health outcomes in police officers.  Journal of police and criminal psychology,  pp. 36, 72–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-019-09351-4

Possemato, K., Bergen-Cico, D., Buckheit, K., Ramon, A., McKenzie, S., Smith, A. R., ... & Pigeon, W. R. (2022). Randomized Clinical Trial of Brief Primary Care–Based Mindfulness Training Versus a Psychoeducational Group for Veterans With Posttraumatic Stress Disorder.  The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry,  84(1), 44829.

Sun, S., Guy, A. A., Zelaya, D. G., & Operario, D. (2022). Mindfulness for reducing minority stress and promoting health among sexual minority men: Uncovering intervention principles and techniques.  Mindfulness,  13(10), 2473-2487. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-022-01973-w