NEED A NEW WRITTER, DEAL FELL THROUGH
Running Head: SOCIAL CLASSES AND STRATIFICATION IN THE UNITED STATES 1
SOCIAL CLASSES AND STRATIFICATION IN THE UNITED STATES 6
Social Classes and Stratification in the United States
Kelcee Wassell
SOC 101
Professor Newhart
September 12, 2017
SUMMARY OF THE ANALYSIS OF VARIOUS COMPONENTS OF SOCIAL STRATIFICATION FOR TEXAS (OKLAHOMA)
|
POPULATION |
AGE |
AGE |
AGE |
AGE |
AGE |
AGE |
AGE |
|
MALE GENDER |
Under 5 years Number-887, percentage: 4.3% |
5 to 9 years Number: 865 Percentage: 4.2 |
10 to 15 years Number: 847 Percentage: 4.1 |
16 years and over Number:7978 Percentage: 38.7 |
21 years and over Number: 7036 Percentage: 34.1 |
Median age (years): 30.5 Number Percentage: X |
65 years and over Number: 981 Percentage: 4.8 |
|
FEMALE GENDER |
Under 5 years Number: 924 Percentage: 4.5 |
5 to 9 years Number: 796 Percentage: 3.9 |
10 to 15 years Number:733 Percentage:3.6 |
16 years and over Number: 7323 Percentage: 35.5 |
21 years and over Number: 6568 Percentage: 31.8 |
Median age (years) Number: 32.2 Percentage: X |
65 years and over Number: 1134 Percentage: 5.5 |
|
RACE |
White Number: 15617 Percentage: 75.7
|
Black American Number:336 Percentage: 1.6 |
Asian Number: 325 Percentage: 1.6 |
American-Indian Number: 269 Percentage: 1.3 |
Chinese Number: 18 Percentage: 0.1
|
Japanese Number: 5 Percentage: 0.0
|
Others Number: 3479 Percentage: 16.9
|
|
FAMILY |
1-person household Number: 15617 Percentage: 23.0 |
2-person household Number:2318 Percentage: 32.1 |
3 -person household Number: 1079 Percentage: 15.0 |
4- person household Number: 1035 Percentage: 14.4 |
5- person household Number: 667 Percentage: 9.2 |
6- person household Number: 262 Percentage: 3.6 |
7 or more- person household Number: 193 Percentage: 2.7 |
|
Higher income earners |
White Number: 5013 Percentage: 34%
|
Black American Number:75 Percentage: 21 |
Asian Number: 82 Percentage: 31 |
American-Indian Number: 69 Percentage: 29 |
Chinese Number: 06 Percentage: 16%
|
Japanese Number: 2 Percentage: 46
|
Others Number: 969 Percentage: 25
|
|
Middle income earners |
White Number: 4011 Percentage: 57%
|
Black American Number: 158 Percentage: 56 |
Asian Number: 198 Percentage: 39 |
American-Indian Number: 121 Percentage: 43 |
Chinese Number: 9 Percentage: 69%
|
Japanese Number: 3 Percentage: 66%
|
Others Number: 2011 Percentage: 51%
|
|
Low income earners |
White Number: 4011 Percentage: 26%
|
Black American Number: 108 Percentage: 39 |
Asian Number: 30 Percentage: 29 |
American-Indian Number: 99 Percentage: 36 |
Chinese Number: 3 Percentage: 26%
|
Japanese Number: 0 Percentage: 0.0
|
Others Number: 802 Percentage: 19
|
Stratification and inequalities based on race, gender, age, social class
Social stratification is a process of separation in the types of social groups as they appear in society depending on the financial capacity and the standards of living of the people in the society. For example the society of Texas is seen to have three types of classes from the data findings from the fact finder shown of the demography of the United States of America. In the analysis of the demography of the population of Texas the total number of people amount to almost 22000 as seen in the table above. Thus, the population according to age and gender is highlighted in the table shows that most of the people in this area are adults.
However the analysis of the people according to race shows that Texas country consist of white Americans as the largest racial group that dominates the society. Nevertheless there other countries that are living within the county including the black Americans, American Indians, Asians, Korea, japan, Chinese among other tribes. However the analysis of the family according to economic achievement characterizes each group of people according to their difference in the level of income.
Those that have high income are classified in the upper social class. This is because they are able to afford higher more services and to purchase more goods which have higher. Moreover they are able to attend better schools and expensive learning institutions. Due to these they identify themselves separately as from other people and they do not associate with people of lower class than theirs. Similarly those who can afford average income are classified as middle class. These people can afford to cater for the general needs to of the family but they are not able to afford luxurious life such as expensive education, expensive food or buy expensive houses and cars. The middle class is a majority class in Texas of Oklahoma seen in the table above. The last group belongs to the lower class. This group has the lowest living standard and they are hardly successful to provide the all the needs which are generally required for average survival of their families.
As a result they have low earning jobs which make them to live in the cheapest houses so that they may be able to save enough money for other expenses such as food and clothing. Thus social stratification in the United States of America is divided in to three groups as described above. The high earing rich people belong to the upper social class and they are separate themselves from other people by living in their own streets which has expensive houses and buildings. Middle class people live average houses which are in good condition but they are not expensive to contain more luxurious feature like those of the higher social class. Finally the lower class lives in the cheapest houses, the buy cheap clothes and also they buy cheap food so as to spend their small income economically to cater for other needs.
References
Beeghley, Leonard. Structure of social stratification in the United States. Routledge, 2015.
Bledstein, B. (2016). The Culture of Professionalism. The Middle Class and the Development of Higher Education in America.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (2014). Ecology of the family as a context for human development: Research perspectives. Developmental psychology, 22(6), 723.
Warner, W. L., Meeker, M., & Eells, K. (2015). Social class in America. New York.
McLoyd, V. C. (2013). Socioeconomic disadvantage and child development. American psychologist, 53(2), 185.
Domhoff, G. W. (2012). Who Rules America?.
Kohn, M. L., & Schooler, C. (2013). Work and personality: An inquiry into the impact of social stratification. Ablex Pub.
Labov, W. (2006). The social stratification of English in New York city. Cambridge University Press.
Lenski, G. E. (2013). Power and privilege: A theory of social stratification. UNC Press Books.