Multi-Touch Screens vs. Mouse-Driven Screens (RE WRITE PAPER)

profilegalam18
Week3Assignment1Rubric.pdf

10/19/2018 https://blackboard.strayer.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/CIS/375/1162/Week3/Week 3 Assignment 1 Rubric.html

https://blackboard.strayer.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/CIS/375/1162/Week3/Week%203%20Assignment%201%20Rubric.html 1/1

Points: 180 Assignment 1: Multi-Touch Screens vs. Mouse-Driven Screens

Criteria Unacceptable

Below 70% F

Fair

70-79% C

Proficient

80-89% B

Exemplary

90-100% A 1. Differentiate between the interaction types and styles that apply to multi-touch screens and applications running on them.

Weight: 20%

Did not submit or incompletely differentiated between the interaction types and styles that apply to multi-touch screens and applications running on them.

Partially differentiated between the interaction types and styles that apply to multi-touch screens and applications running on them.

Satisfactorily differentiated between the interaction types and styles that apply to multi-touch screens and applications running on them.

Thoroughly differentiated between the interaction types and styles that apply to multi-touch screens and applications running on them.

2. Determine the conceptual model that you would use when designing a product for your restaurant.

Weight: 20%

Did not submit or incompletely determined the conceptual model that you would use when designing a product for your restaurant.

Partially determined the conceptual model that you would use when designing a product for your restaurant.

Satisfactorily determined the conceptual model that you would use when designing a product for your restaurant.

Thoroughly determined the conceptual model that you would use when designing a product for your restaurant.

3. Describe the key analogies and concepts these monitors expose to users, including the task-domain objects users manipulate on the screen.

Weight: 20%

Did not submit or incompletely described the key analogies and concepts these monitors expose to users, including the task-domain objects users manipulate on the screen.

Partially described the key analogies and concepts these monitors expose to users, including the task-domain objects users manipulate on the screen.

Satisfactorily described the key analogies and concepts these monitors expose to users, including the task-domain objects users manipulate on the screen.

Thoroughly described the key analogies and concepts these monitors expose to users, including the task-domain objects users manipulate on the screen.

4. Determine one (1) utility / tool in an application for touch- based and mouse-drive screens that should be designed with memory retention / recall. Provide a rationale for your response.

Weight: 20%

Did not submit or incompletely determined one (1) utility / tool in an application for touch- based and mouse- drive screens that should be designed with memory retention / recall. Did not submit or incompletely provided a rationale for your response.

Partially determined one (1) utility / tool in an application for touch-based and mouse-drive screens that should be designed with memory retention / recall. Partially provided a rationale for your response.

Satisfactorily determined one (1) utility / tool in an application for touch-based and mouse-drive screens that should be designed with memory retention / recall. Satisfactorily provided a rationale for your response.

Thoroughly determined one (1) utility / tool in an application for touch-based and mouse-drive screens that should be designed with memory retention / recall. Thoroughly provided a rationale for your response.

5. Use at least three (3) quality resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and similar Websites do not qualify as quality resources. You may use the resources above or others of your choosing.

Weight: 10%

No references provided.

Does not meet the required number of references; some or all references poor quality choices.

Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.

Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.

6. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements

Weight: 10%

More than 6 errors present

5-6 errors present 3-4 errors present 0-2 errors present