write a theory
Lingyun017
Week3-TheoreticalperspectivesandhistoricaloverviewofAustIR.pptxWeek 3 – Theoretical Perspectives and Historical Overview of the Australian IR System
21702 – Industrial Relations
© University of Technology Sydney
UTS CRICOS 00099F
Today’s lecture
Part 1 – Theoretical Perspectives
What is theory?
Defining theory and its value in the study of IR
The role of Agency, Context and Strategic Choice in explaining industrial relations
Theoretical perspectives on industrial relations
Unitarist
Pluralist
Marxist/ Radical
Gender and Industrial Relations
Part 2 – Historical overview of Australian IR
Origins and evolution of Australian trade unions
The ‘Great Strikes’ of the 1890s
Conciliation and Arbitration Act and Court
The Harvester Judgement and changes to wage-setting
The new neoliberal era and decentralisation of IR
Linking history and theory
© University of Technology Sydney
UTS CRICOS 00099F
This week in the media
9 August 2020
ABC
7 August 2020
SMH
6 August 2020
SMH
UTS CRICOS 00099F
What is Theory?
| LEVEL | TYPES OF EXPLANATION |
| Causal theory | A complete answer to the ‘why’ question, identifying relationships between variables and an account of the process by which one determines the other |
| Law | A statement of a relationship between two or more variables that inevitably produces the same outcome, in terms of events or phenomena |
| Model | A simplification or representation of relationships between events or phenomena that is designed to provide a clearer picture of the world |
| Taxonomy | A classification scheme designed for a particular purpose that groups together events or phenomena on the basis of similar properties or characteristics Represents an attempt to move analysis from the specific to the general as specific events or social situations are located within categories. But these categories are largely description and don’t explain much about why events or situations occur |
| Description | An account of an event or phenomenon from a particular standpoint, which involves a process of interpretation and reduction, selecting some ‘facts’ as important, while discarding others |
Lewins’ five levels of explanation
‘An attempt to account for a given phenomenon, that is, to show what, how and/or why it is’
(Lewin 1992, p. 104)
© University of Technology Sydney
UTS CRICOS 00099F
Dunlop and Industrial Relations Systems
A simplified version of Dunlop’s systems model
John Dunlop’s (1958) IR Systems model argued that all industrial relations systems comprise three main ‘actors’ or ‘parties’ who interact with each other and produce rules to regulate behaviour
The State
Employees
Employers
The actors have different goals but are bound by a shared perspective of the system (i.e. ideology, which is ‘a set of ideas and beliefs commonly held by the actors that helps to bind or to integrate the system together as an entity’)
Dunlop’s model suggests that industrial relations systems operate within a larger ‘environment’ or ‘context’, which influences the rule-making behaviour of the actors. The three ‘interrelated contexts’ are:
Technology
Market or budgetary constraints
Power relations and the status of the actors
Dunlop’s ‘Systems Approach’ suggests that the actors interact in varying environmental contexts and, by using certain processes and procedures, produce a ‘web of rules’ that allows the system to function
© University of Technology Sydney
5
Context and Agency
Scholars in the US criticised Dunlop’s Systems Approach for relying too much on explaining outcomes based on context
In a seminal book in the industrial relations field (image on slide) published by Kochan, Katz and McKersie (1986), these scholars advocated for a role of ‘strategic choice’ in industrial relations theory
They argued that effective explanations of industrial relations can only come about through a combination of ‘context’ and ‘agency’
‘Contexts’ are the external circumstances in which parties find themselves (largely beyond their control)
‘Agency’ is the capacity of social actors (e.g. individuals, organisations) to take action as a result of the choices they make. Agency emphasises the choices that the parties make on the basis of their ambitions, values and perceptions of the situation they are in
© University of Technology Sydney
UTS CRICOS 00099F
Strategic Choice
‘industrial relations practices and outcomes are shaped by the interaction of environmental forces along with the strategic choices and values of managers, union leaders, workers and public policy decisions makers’
(Kochan et al. 1994, p. 5)
‘A key premise of our framework is that choice and discretion on the part of labour, management and government affect the course and structure of industrial relations systems…Although environmental pressures are important and serve as a starting point for discussion of the determinants of an industrial relations system, these pressures do not strictly determine industrial relations outcomes. Thus an understanding of the choices the parties make in any given period must be informed by an analysis of the structures and history that constrain those choices.’
(Kochan et al. 1986, pp. 13-14)
© University of Technology Sydney
UTS CRICOS 00099F
Values and industrial relations
‘Different people perceive the employment relationship from different and competing positions about what is valuable and that those different positions usually reflect deeper assumptions about the nature of organisations and society as a whole’ (Bray et al. 2018)
It is useful to analyse values when studying industrial relations
Taxonomy of values in employment relations are derived from the work of Alan Fox (1966, 1974) – this helps to give a framework for understanding relations between parties
| Approach | Key analytical tools | Ideological perspective | Assumptions about the employment relationship |
| HRM | The organisational leadership and policies required to satisfy the psychological needs of employees | Unitarist | The employment relationship as essentially harmonious with employees and employers sharing common interests, embodied in organisational goals |
| Marxism | Class struggle and control within the labour process | Radical | The employment relationship as subject to enduring conflict in which the control exercised by employers over employees is illegitimate and can only end when major social change is achieved |
| Employment relations | The rules that regulate the employment relationship | Pluralist | The employment relationship as having the ever-present potential for conflict because employers and employees sometimes have different interests. These conflicts, however, are legitimate and can be accommodated by an appropriate network of procedural and substantive rules |
© University of Technology Sydney
UTS CRICOS 00099F
3 main theoretical/ ideological perspectives on industrial relations
Unitarism
Footer content here
Assumes common interests and commitment by employees and employers to organisational goals
Conservative and pro-management
Management’s role is to provide strong leadership and good communications
Employee’s should be loyal to management and the organisation, recognising their common objectives
Trade unions are unwelcome as they compete with management for the loyalty of employees
State intervention should not be necessary
Fox (1966, 1974)
© University of Technology Sydney
Pluralism
Footer content here
Recognises employers and employees will inevitably experience legitimate conflicts of interest that need to be resolved
No one party dominates
The state acts as an impartial guardian of the ‘public interest’, protecting the weak and restraining the strong
Management’s role is to reconcile conflicting opinions
Trade unions are legitimate representatives of employee interests
Scholars generally agree that industrial relations is pluralist: employees and employers have common but also conflicting interests
Fox (1966, 1974)
© University of Technology Sydney
Radical / Marxist
Footer content here
Marxist focus on class struggle and control
Fundamental conflict of interest between workers and employers, stemming from private ownership of means of production and unequal distribution of income and power
Those who own the means of production (capitalists) have more power than those who labour for wages (the proletariat)
Production requires labour, which capitalists must buy from workers in the form of ‘labour power’
The State plays an integral role in protecting the interests of those who own the means of production
Employees are vulnerable as individuals, but this can lead them to forming worker collectives and unions
Fox (1966, 1974)
© University of Technology Sydney
Gender and industrial relations
Feminist scholars (e.g. Barbara Pocock, Judy Wajcman – see your readings for Week 3) argue that gender has been an understudied theme in Australian industrial relations theory and practice
Our analysis of IR issues has been ‘gender neutral’ or even ‘gender blind’
Feminist scholars argue that this is because the study of IR has been narrowly focused on the sphere of paid work which has, during a large part of history, excluded or marginalised women, seeing an under-representation of the interests of women
Scholars argue for greater attention around the needs and interests of women in IR debates, particularly at the level of collective bargaining and in setting the terms and conditions of employment e.g. gender equality bargaining
We need to exercise caution, however, in categorising all women as sharing the same interests or characteristics
© University of Technology Sydney
UTS CRICOS 00099F
Why bother with IR history?
Explains the social, political and legal background to the IR system
Teaches us about the future
The arguments apparent in the ‘Great Strikes’ did not go away i.e. How should the employment relationship be regulated and what role do each of the parties have in this?
UTS CRICOS 00099F
Origins and evolution of Australian unions (1800s – 1890)
Trade unions have their origins in the 1800s as occupationally-based mutual benefit societies that grew into ‘craft unions’ as skilled workers (e.g. engineers, carpenters, printers) started to organise and form unions
Unions were successful in winning the right to the eight-hour work day in 1856
By the late 1880s, unions had attained considerable membership and power, extended their organisation into most trades and industries, and continued to demand improvements in wages and conditions
This scenario changed with the major defeat of unions during the ‘Great Strikes’ of the 1890s
UTS CRICOS 00099F
Pre-Federation – The Great Strikes (1890s)
The Ballad Of 1891 (Words by Helen Palmer ©Doreen Bridges Music Doreen Jacobs)
The price of wool was falling in 1891 The men who owned the acres saw something must be done "We will break the Shearers' Union, and show we're masters still And they'll take the terms we give them, or we'll find the ones who will" From Claremont to Barcaldine, the shearers' camps were full Ten thousand blades were ready to strip the greasy wool When through the west like thunder, rang out the Union's call "The sheds'll be shore Union or they won't be shorn at all" Oh, Billy Lane was with them, his words were like a flame The flag of blue above them, they spoke Eureka's name "Tomorrow," said the squatters, "they'll find it does not pay We're bringing up free labourers to get the clip away" "Tomorrow," said the shearers, "they may not be so keen We can mount three thousand horses, to show them what we mean" "Then we'll pack the west with troopers, from Bourke to Charters Towers You can have your fill of speeches but the final strength is ours" "Be damned to your six-shooters, your troopers and police The sheep are growing heavy, the burr is in the fleece" "Then if Nordenfeldt and Gatling won't bring you to your knees We'll find a law," the squatters said, "that's made for times like these" To trial at Rockhampton the fourteen men were brought The judge had got his orders, the squatters owned the court But for every one that's sentenced, ten thousand won't forget Where they jail someone for striking, it's a rich man's country yet
You can listen to The Ballad of 1891 about the Shearers’ Strike here: http://unionsong.com/u114.html
Maritime strike of 1890 saw Australian maritime workers take sustained strike action over August to November for grievances around pay and conditions. The strike was unsuccessful with maritime workers ordered back to work and facing a 30% pay cut
The Great Shearer’s Strike of 1891 was a dispute between unionised and non-unionised wool workers in Queensland lasting months, triggering violence and arrests of union leaders
These strikes signalled a turning point for the labour movement and recognition of the need for greater political protection. Significantly, the strikes prompted the emergence of a system of compulsory conciliation and arbitration and the formation of the Australian Labor Party (ALP)
UTS CRICOS 00099F
Conciliation and arbitration: the historic compromise
An early president of the Arbitration Court made this explicit: ‘The system of arbitration adopted by the Act is based on unionism. Indeed, without unions, it is hard to conceive how arbitration could be worked’ (Higgins 1920, 15). This was because compulsory arbitration regulated relationships between organisations, between employers and employer associations on the one side and unions on the other. It did not regulate relations between individuals.
The main objectives of the Commonwealth Conciliation and Arbitration Act 1904 (among other objectives included):
To prevent lock outs and strikes in relation to industrial disputes
To constitute a Commonwealth Court of Conciliation and Arbitration having jurisdiction for the prevention and settlement of industrial disputes
To provide for the making and enforcement of industrial agreements between employers and employees in relation to industrial disputes
UTS CRICOS 00099F
Conciliation and Arbitration Act 1904
UTS CRICOS 00099F
The Harvester Judgement of 1907
[Ex parte H.V. McKay (1907) 2 CAR 1]
Henry Bourne Higgins (1851-1929)
The arbitration system led to the development of a centralised framework of wage determination, designed to protect workers who were unable to make gains through individual bargaining
The Harvester case of 1907 fixed a minimum wage deemed to be ‘fair and reasonable’ for an unskilled worker to support his family (a wife and three children) and live in “frugal comfort”
This set the foundations for Australia’s minimum wage system and entrenched the notion of “a fair day’s pay for a fair day’s work”
UTS CRICOS 00099F
Changing economic and socio-political context – The Accord
In the context of economic and social changes occurring in the 1970s, the Labor Party was elected to Federal Government in 1983
In the same year, the Prices and Incomes Accord was signed between the Labor Party and ACTU to prevent rising inflation, facilitate government plans for structural reform of the economy, and centralise wage determination
As part of the agreement, the ACTU agreed that unions wouldn’t make any extra wage claims (to cap rising inflation) and, in exchange, the government pledged to strengthen the “social wage” in Australia
We’ve since seen a trend towards decentralisation of wage determination and a focus on enterprise-level bargaining (to be discussed in later weeks)
The Hawke-Keating Government led from 1983 to 1996
Bill Kelty was Secretary of the ACTU at the signing of the Accord in 1983
UTS CRICOS 00099F
Neoliberalism
What? Belief in the free market and minimum barriers to the flow of goods, services and capital. Extends traditional liberal philosophy – separation of politics and economics and that markets should be free from interference of government.
This approach is based on four principles:
Economic growth is paramount.
Free trade benefits all nations – rich or poor – because every nation has a comparative advantage.
Government spending creates inefficiency and waste: although most neoliberals agree that not all public expenditure is wasteful, many argue that it can be reduced.
In the distribution of economic goods, individual responsibility replaces the concepts of public goods and community
Interest groups, such as the HR Nicholls Society, believe that the regulation of workplace relations should be minimal and employers should be given full flexibility, and publicly rejected the Accord arrangement
The election of the Howard Government and introduction of changes to workplace law led to one of the most radical transformations of Australia’s IR system (see the reading by Ellem and Cooper (2008) in your Reading List for more on this)
One of the most significant aspects of the Workchoices legislation introduced by the Howard Government in 2005 was changing the constitutional foundation for federal employment relations legislation, from the conciliation and arbitration power to the corporations power. This allowed the Federal government to directly set minimum terms and conditions of employment without recourse to the making of awards in the settlement of an industrial dispute.
Prime Minister John Howard led the Liberal-National Coalition from 1996 to 2007
UTS CRICOS 00099F
Summary
While ideological perspectives in the study of industrial relations are classified into three (unitarist, pluralist and Marixt/radical), the theoretical approach used in this subject is characterised by a pluralist perspective and the use of rules and rule-making as the key tool for understanding the employment relationship
It’s important to consider gender in our analysis of employment relations processes and outcomes
Historically, we’ve seen a shift from a centralised framework of determining wages and conditions (via industrial tribunals and the C&A system) towards decentralisation
Trade unions enjoyed a favourable political, economic and IR climate during the 20th century, which was disrupted with the emergence of a neoliberal government agenda in the 1980s and 1990s
History shows a shift in the balance of power between the parties, which we will look at in more detail over the next 3 weeks
Next Week – The Parties (Part 1) – The State
© University of Technology Sydney
UTS CRICOS 00099F
Reference List
Union Song, The Ballad of 1891, http://unionsong.com/u114.html
Queensland Historical Atlas, Great Shearers’ Strike of 1891, https://www.qhatlas.com.au/content/great-shearers%E2%80%99-strike-1891
Ellem and Cooper (2008) ‘The Neoliberal State, Trade Unions and Collective Bargaining in Australia’, British Journal of Industrial Relations, 46(3), 532-554.
Fair Work Ombudsman – Australia’s industrial relations timeline – a brief history of workplace relations law in Australia
ABC News (2018) ‘ACTU- Labor Accord that helped shape Australia is gone, but not forgotten’
AWU Queensland, ‘125 th Anniversary of the Great Shearers’ Strike’, YouTube video
Wajcman, J. (2000), ‘Feminism Facing Industrial Relations in Britain, British Journal of Industrial Relations, 38(2): 183-201.
Fox (1974) Beyond Contract
Fox (1966) Industrial Sociology And Industrial Relations
Flanders (1970) Management and unions: the theory and reform of industrial relations
Dunlop (1958) Industrial Relations Systems
Kochan, Katz and McKersie (1986) The Transformation of American Industrial Relations
UTS CRICOS 00099F
