LAW

Armstrong v. Exceptional Child Center, Inc. - Harvard Law Review

Question One

 

Who do you think has the better of the argument in  Armstrong, Scalia or Sotomayor, and why? 

 

Question Two

 

Do you think Illinois law about interpreting insurance contracts, exclusionary clauses, and experimental treatments is correct as a policy matter?  Does it go too far in protecting insureds, get it just right, or not go far enough? 

 

Question Three

Is the justification for the so-called “employer mandate” the same or different than the justification for the individual mandate?