Putting It All Together: Summarizing Theories of Career Development

Due Dec 18 by 10:59pm Points 50 Submitting a text entry box or a file upload Attempts 0 Allowed Attempts 2

Start Assignment

Back to Week at a Glance (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/24309/modules/items/610607)

Career development plays a significant role in the counseling practice, regardless of the setting. Accordingly, most counselor licensure and school counselor certification exams include questions concerning career development theory and practice. In this assignment, you will summarize the primary aspects of the traditional and recent career counseling theories discussed over the past two weeks. Keep these notes to help you prepare for your credentialing exam(s) post-graduation.

To Prepare for the Activity

Review the Learning Resources concerning traditional and recent theories of career development presented over the past two weeks. Access the “Putting It All Together: Summarizing Theories of Career Development” template located in the Week 3 Learning Resources.

PUTTING IT ALL TOGETHER: SUMMARIZING THEORIES OF CAREER DEVELOPMENT

RESOURCES

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity. Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

WEEKLY RESOURCES (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/24309/modules/items/610611)

BY DAY 7

COUN_6753_Week3_Assignment_Rubric

Complete the “Putting It All Together: Summarizing Theories of Career Development” chart located in the Week 3 Learning Resources. Complete the reflections questions at the bottom of the chart. Compare and contrast traditional and recent theories of career development and discuss new insights you gained regarding the applicability of these theories to marginalized populations since the Week 1 Discussion.

Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.

1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as COUN6753+WK3Assgn+last name+first initial.

2. Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page. 3. Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.

SUBMISSION INFORMATION

Criteria Ratings Pts

25 pts

12.5 pts

Adherence to Assignment Expectations:• Complete the “Putting It All Together: Summarizing Theories of Career Development” chart, located in the Week 3 Learning Resources.• Complete the reflections questions at the bottom of the chart, comparing and contrasting traditional and recent theories of career development and discussing new insights you have gained regarding the applicability of these theories to marginalized populations since the Week 1 Discussion.

25 to >22.4 pts A

Thoroughly addresses all required components of the assignment with a well-developed, cohesive, and insightful narrative that exceeds expectations.

22.4 to >19.9 pts B

Thoroughly addresses all required components of the assignment with a well- developed narrative.

19.9 to >17.4 pts C

Addresses some of the required components.

17.4 to >0 pts F

Addresses few to no required components.

Assimilation & Synthesis of Ideas:Course content is synthesized and

12.5 to >11.24 pts A

Critically evaluates course content and main points. Supports the

11.24 to >9.99 pts B

Synthesizes the course content to illustrate main points and supports the

9.99 to >8.74 pts C

Identifies key points from the course content and supports the key points with

8.74 to >0 pts F

Key points are missing and minimal to no information from the learning

Total Points: 50

Criteria Ratings Pts

12.5 pts

supported with information from the learning resources and examples.

evaluation with information from the learning resources and personal/professional experiences.

synthesis with information from the learning resources and personal/professional experiences.

minimal information from the learning resources or personal/professional experiences.

resources or personal/professional experiences is used.

Expression and Formatting: The extent to which the submission demonstrated writing quality.

12.5 to >11.24 pts A Writing is organized, concise, and scholarly written with no grammatical errors.

11.24 to >9.99 pts B Writing is organized, concise, and scholarly written with minimal to no grammatical errors.

9.99 to >8.74 pts C Writing is unclear or interrupted by grammatical errors.

8.74 to >0 pts F Writing lacks clarity, organization and has significant grammatical errors.