ihuman Reflection

profileSerwaae
Week2Rubric.docx

Week 2: i-Human Practice Case & Reflection

Week 2: i-Human Practice Case & Reflection

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFocused Health History

Complete a focused health history.

5 pts

Satisfactory

Requirement met: Complete a focused health history. Satisfactory (100%-75%)

2.5 pts

Needs Improvement

Needs Improvement (74%-50%)

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Requirement not met. Unsatisfactory (49%-0%)

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFocused Physical Exam

Complete a focused physical exam.

5 pts

Satisfactory

Requirement met: Complete a focused physical assessment. Satisfactory (100%-75%)

2.5 pts

Needs Improvement

Needs Improvement (74%-50%)

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Requirement not met. Unsatisfactory (49%-0%)

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEHR Documentation - Subjective Data

Document the history of present illness (HPI) and focused review of systems (ROS) in the EHR. Documentation should be:   1. accurate   2. detailed   3. written using professional terminology   4. pertinent to the chief complaint   5. include subjective findings only

5 pts

Satisfactory

Requirement met: Document the history of present illness (HPI) and focused review of systems (ROS) in the EHR.

2.5 pts

Needs Improvement

Needs Improvement

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Requirement not met.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEHR Documentation - Objective Data

Document physical exam in the EHR. Documentation should be:   1. accurate   2. detailed   3. written using professional terminology   4. pertinent to the chief complaint   5. include objective findings only

5 pts

Satisfactory

Requirement met: Document physical exam findings in the EHR.

2.5 pts

Needs Improvement

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Requirement not met.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeKey Findings

Organize the key findings with the most important findings first and the least important findings last on the list.

5 pts

Satisfactory

Requirement met: The key findings were organized.

2.5 pts

Needs Improvement

The key findings were partially organized.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Requirement not met.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProblem Statement

Document sample problem statement in the EHR using professional language. Include the following components:   1. name or initials, age   2. chief complaint   3. positive and negative subjective findings   4. positive and negative objective findings

5 pts

Satisfactory

Requirement met: Document sample problem statement in the EHR.

2.5 pts

Needs Improvement

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Requirement not met.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeManagement Plan

Document sample treatment plan within the iHuman Virtual Patient Encounter. Include the following components:    1. diagnostic tests   2. medications: write a specific prescription for each medication, including over-the-counter medications    3. suggested consults/referrals   4. client education   5. follow-up, including time interval and specific symptomatology to prompt a sooner return  6. Provide rationales for each intervention and cite at least one relevant scholarly source as defined by program expectations

5 pts

Satisfactory

Requirement met: Sample management plan is included within the iHuman case.

2.5 pts

Needs Improvement

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Requirement not met.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReflection: History and Physical Exam 4 Required Criteria

Assess your ability to gather information on your client within the iHuman Virtual Patient Encounter.  1. Use the iHuman score sheet to review your results for the focused health history and focused physical exam. How did you perform?  2. What did you find easy or difficult about navigating through focused health history and focused physical exam sections of the case?  3. Describe one strategy to improve your performance in the next Virtual  Patient Encounter.  4. Responses were substantive (adds importance, depth, and meaningfulness to the reflection post).

15 pts

Excellent

All requirements met.

14 pts

Very Good

3 requirements met.

12 pts

Satisfactory

2 requirements met.

7.5 pts

Needs Improvement

1 requirement met.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

No requirements met.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReflection: Electronic Health Record (EHR) 4 Required Criteria

Assess your performance in documenting your findings on the electronic health record (EHR).  1. What did you find easy or difficult about navigating through the documentation of history and physical within the system?  2. Did you document all required components in the case?  3. Describe one strategy to improve your performance in the next Virtual Patient Encounter.  4. Responses were substantive (adds importance, depth, and meaningfulness to the reflection post).

15 pts

Excellent

All requirements met.

14 pts

Very Good

3 requirements met.

12 pts

Satisfactory

2 requirements met.

7.5 pts

Needs Improvement

1 requirement met.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

No requirements met.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReflection: Key Findings 3 Required Criteria

Assess your performance in determining key findings. 1. What did you find easy or difficult about navigating through the key findings and organization section of the case?  2. How did your key findings compare with the expert’s response provided?  3. Describe one strategy to improve your performance in the next Virtual Patient Encounter.

10 pts

Excellent

All requirements met.

8 pts

Satisfactory

2 requirements met.

5 pts

Needs Improvement

1 requirement met.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

No requirements met.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReflection: Problem Statement 4 Required Criteria

Assess your performance in creating and documenting a problem statement within the iHuman case.  1. What did you find easy or difficult about creating the problem statement?  2. How did your problem statement compare with the expert’s response provided?  3. Describe one strategy to improve your performance in the next Virtual Patient Encounter.  4. Responses were substantive (adds importance, depth, and meaningfulness to the reflection post).

10 pts

Excellent

All requirements met.

9 pts

Very Good

3 requirements met.

8 pts

Satisfactory

2 requirements met.

5 pts

Needs Improvement

1 requirement met.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

No requirements met.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReflection: Management Plan 4 Required Criteria

Assess your performance in creating and documenting a management plan within the iHuman case.  1. What did you find easy or difficult about creating the management plan?  2. How did your management plan compare with the expert’s response provided?  3. Describe one strategy to improve your performance in the next Virtual Patient Encounter.  4. Responses were substantive (adds importance, depth, and meaningfulness to the reflection post).

15 pts

Excellent

All requirements met.

14 pts

Very Good

3 requirements met.

12 pts

Satisfactory

2 requirements met.

7.5 pts

Needs Improvement

1 requirement met.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

No requirements met.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLate Penalty Deduction

0 pts

a. Full credit

On time

0 pts

b. -10 points

1 day late

0 pts

c. -20 points

2 days late

0 pts

d. -30 points

3 days late

0 pts

e. More than three (3) days late

No credit.

0 pts