MGT3045 WK2 Project

MGT3045 Week 2 Project Rubric Course: MGT3045-Human Resource Management SU01

Criteria No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F through D Range) (6-7) 7 points

Satisfactory (C Range) (7-8) 8 points

Proficient (B Range) (8-9) 9 points

Exemplary (A Range) (9-10) 10 points

Criterion Score

Referencing Title VII of

the Civil Rights Act,

analyzed the two types

of sexual harassment

and which type Martha

is experiencing.

/ 10Did not identify two types

of sexual harassment.

Unsupported with

research.

Identified two types of

sexual harassment.

Lacked credible research

support.

Described two types of

sexual harassment.

Weakly supported with

research.

Analyzed the two types of

sexual harassment and

which type Martha is

experiencing.

Sufficiently supported

with research.

Analysis of two types of

sexual harassment and

which type Martha is

experiencing was

compelling and well-

considered.

Well-supported by

research.

Criteria No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F through D Range) (12-14) 14 points

Satisfactory (C Range) (14-16) 16 points

Proficient (B Range) (16-18) 18 points

Exemplary (A Range) (18-20) 20 points

Criterion Score

Analyzed HRM’s

obligation to investigate

and presented steps to

comply with the EEOC.

/ 20Did not identify

HRM’s obligation to

investigate or present

steps to comply with the

EEOC.

Unsupported with

research.

Identified HRM’s

obligation to investigate or

steps to comply with the

EEOC.

Lacked credible research

support.

Described HRM’s

obligation to investigate

and steps to comply with

the EEOC.

Weakly supported with

research.

Analyzed HRM’s

obligation to investigate

and steps to comply with

the EEOC.

Sufficiently supported

with research.

Analysis of HRM’s

obligation to investigate

and steps to comply with

the EEOC was in-depth

and compelling.

Well supported by

research.

Criteria No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F through D Range) (6-7) 7 points

Satisfactory (C Range) (7-8) 8 points

Proficient (B Range) (8-9) 9 points

Exemplary (A Range) (9-10) 10 points

Criterion Score

Analyzed the likelihood

of John being found

guilty and the options to

remedy the situation

within the workplace.

/ 10Did not identify likelihood

of John being found guilty

and the options to remedy

the situation within the

workplace.

Unsupported with

research.

Identified the likelihood of

John being found guilty

and the options to remedy

the situation within the

workplace.

Lacked credible research

support.

Described likelihood of

John being found guilty

and the options to remedy

the situation within the

workplace.

Weakly supported with

research.

Analyzed likelihood of

John being found guilty

and the options to remedy

the situation within the

workplace.

Sufficiently supported

with research.

Analysis of the likelihood

of John being found guilty

and the options to remedy

the situation within the

workplace was in-depth

and compelling.

Well supported by

research.

Total / 50

Overall Score

Criteria No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F through D Range) (6-7) 7 points

Satisfactory (C Range) (7-8) 8 points

Proficient (B Range) (8-9) 9 points

Exemplary (A Range) (9-10) 10 points

Criterion ScoreCriteria No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F through D Range) (6-7) 7 points

Satisfactory (C Range) (7-8) 8 points

Proficient (B Range) (8-9) 9 points

Exemplary (A Range) (9-10) 10 points

Criterion Score

Wrote in a clear, concise,

and organized manner;

demonstrated ethical

scholarship in accurate

representation and

attribution of sources

(i.e., APA); and displayed

accurate spelling,

grammar, and

punctuation.

/ 10Submission contains no

discernible overall intent

in author’s selection of

ideas.

Errors in basic writing

conventions are

sufficiently numerous to

prevent reader

comprehension.

No attempt at

Academic/APA formatting

in presentation

Submission contains

random presentation of

ideas, which prevents

understanding the

majority of author’s overall

intent.

Errors in basic writing

conventions are

sufficiently numerous to

prevent reader

comprehension of majority

of the work.

Academic/APA format is

attempted, but errors are

significant.

Ideas are presented in a

way that forces the reader

to make repeated

inferences in order to

identify and follow the

author’s overall intent.

Errors in basic writing

conventions interfere

with, but do not prevent,

reader comprehension.

Academic/APA format is

attempted but errors are

distracting.

The reader can follow the

author’s overall intent as

stated.

The reader noticed a few

errors in basic writing

conventions but these few

errors do not interfere

with reader

comprehension.

Using Academic/APA

format, accurately. Errors

are noticeable but minor.

The writer’s overall

argument and language

are clear and tightly

focused, leaving the

reader with no room for

confusion about author’s

intent.

Text is basically error free,

so that a reader would

have to purposely search

to find any errors that may

be present.

Using Academic/APA

format proficiently. Text is

basically error free.

No Submission 0 points minimum

Emerging (F through D Range) 35 points minimum

Satisfactory (C Range) 40 points minimum

Proficient (B Range) 45 points minimum

Exemplary (A Range) 50 points minimum