BUS4101 Week 2 Disc
Sandy4tx
Week2ProjectRubric.pdf
BUS4101 Week 2 Project Rubric Course: BUS4101-Quality Management SU01
Criteria No Submission 0 points
Emerging (F through D Range) (6-7) 7 points
Satisfactory (C Range) (7-8) 8 points
Proficient (B Range) (8-9) 9 points
Exemplary (A Range) (9-10) 10 points
Criterion Score
Selected a
company with
which
everyone in
the class
would be
familiar.
/ 10Did not identify a
company.
Unsupported
with research.
Identified a
company with
which no other
person in the
class would likely
be familiar.
Lacked credible
research support.
Selected a
company with
which few, if any,
people in the
class would be
familiar.
Weakly
supported with
research.
Selected a
company with
which most
people in the
class would be
familiar.
Sufficiently
supported with
research.
Selected a
company with
which everyone
in the class
would be
familiar.
Well supported
by research.
Criteria No Submission 0 points
Emerging (F through D Range) (6-7) 7 points
Satisfactory (C Range) (7-8) 8 points
Proficient (B Range) (8-9) 9 points
Exemplary (A Range) (9-10) 10 points
Criterion Score
Criteria No Submission 0 points
Emerging (F through D Range) (6-7) 7 points
Satisfactory (C Range) (7-8) 8 points
Proficient (B Range) (8-9) 9 points
Exemplary (A Range) (9-10) 10 points
Criterion Score
Analyzed the
company in
terms of the
seven
dimensions of
an
organization's
culture that
were given.
/ 10Did not identify
seven
dimensions.
Unsupported
with research.
Identified seven
dimensions.
Lacked credible
research support.
Described seven
dimensions.
Weakly
supported with
research.
Analyzed the
company in
terms of the
seven
dimensions of
the
organization’s
culture.
Sufficiently
supported with
research.
Thoroughly
analyzed the
company in term
of the seven
dimensions of
the
organization’s
culture.
Well supported
by research.
Criteria No Submission 0 points
Emerging (F through D Range) (6-7) 7 points
Satisfactory (C Range) (7-8) 8 points
Proficient (B Range) (8-9) 9 points
Exemplary (A Range) (9-10) 10 points
Criterion Score
Criteria No Submission 0 points
Emerging (F through D Range) (6-7) 7 points
Satisfactory (C Range) (7-8) 8 points
Proficient (B Range) (8-9) 9 points
Exemplary (A Range) (9-10) 10 points
Criterion Score
Explained why
the
organization is
viewed as
having either a
traditional
culture or a
quality culture.
/ 10Did not identify
culture.
Unsupported
with research.
Identified
culture.
Lacked credible
research support.
Described
culture.
Weakly
supported with
research.
Explained why
the organization
is viewed as
having one of the
two forms of
culture.
Sufficiently
supported with
research.
Offered a
compelling
explanation as to
why the
organization is
viewed as having
one of the two
forms of culture.
Well supported
by research.
Criteria No Submission 0 points
Emerging (F through D Range) (6-7) 7 points
Satisfactory (C Range) (7-8) 8 points
Proficient (B Range) (8-9) 9 points
Exemplary (A Range) (9-10) 10 points
Criterion Score
Criteria No Submission 0 points
Emerging (F through D Range) (6-7) 7 points
Satisfactory (C Range) (7-8) 8 points
Proficient (B Range) (8-9) 9 points
Exemplary (A Range) (9-10) 10 points
Criterion Score
Explained why
the
organization's
culture would
increase or
decrease its
chances of
success.
/ 10Did not identify
culture impact.
Unsupported
with research.
Identified culture
impact.
Lacked credible
research support.
Described
culture.
Weakly
supported with
research.
Explained why
the
organization’s
culture would
increase or
decrease its
chances of
success.
Sufficiently
supported with
research.
Clearly explained
the
organizations’
future success
based on the
form of culture
that it currently
has.
Well supported
by research.
Criteria No Submission 0 points
Emerging (F through D Range) (6-7) 7 points
Satisfactory (C Range) (7-8) 8 points
Proficient (B Range) (8-9) 9 points
Exemplary (A Range) (9-10) 10 points
Criterion Score
Criteria No Submission 0 points
Emerging (F through D Range) (6-7) 7 points
Satisfactory (C Range) (7-8) 8 points
Proficient (B Range) (8-9) 9 points
Exemplary (A Range) (9-10) 10 points
Criterion Score
Wrote in a
clear, concise,
and organized
manner;
demonstrated
ethical
scholarship in
accurate
representation
and attribution
of sources (i.e.,
APA); and
displayed
accurate
spelling,
grammar, and
punctuation.
/ 10Submission
contains no
discernible
overall intent in
author’s
selection of
ideas.
Errors in basic
writing
conventions are
sufficiently
numerous to
prevent reader
comprehension.
No attempt at
Academic/APA
formatting in
presentation
Submission
contains random
presentation of
ideas, which
prevents
understanding
the majority of
author’s overall
intent.
Errors in basic
writing
conventions are
sufficiently
numerous to
prevent reader
comprehension
of majority of the
work.
Academic/APA
format is
attempted, but
errors are
significant.
Ideas are
presented in a
way that forces
the reader to
make repeated
inferences in
order to identify
and follow the
author’s overall
intent.
Errors in basic
writing
conventions
interfere with,
but do not
prevent, reader
comprehension.
Academic/APA
format is
attempted but
errors are
distracting.
The reader can
follow the
author’s overall
intent as stated.
The reader
noticed a few
errors in basic
writing
conventions but
these few errors
do not interfere
with reader
comprehension.
Using
Academic/APA
format,
accurately. Errors
are noticeable
but minor.
The writer’s
overall argument
and language are
clear and tightly
focused, leaving
the reader with
no room for
confusion about
author’s intent.
Text is basically
error free, so
that a reader
would have to
purposely search
to find any errors
that may be
present.
Using
Academic/APA
format
proficiently. Text
is basically error
free.
Total / 50
Overall Score
No Submission 0 points minimum
Emerging (F through D Range) 35 points minimum
Satisfactory (C Range) 40 points minimum
Proficient (B Range) 45 points minimum
Exemplary (A Range) 50 points minimum
