COM2006 WK 2 Project
COM2006 Week 2 Project Rubric Course: COM2006-Interpersonal Communication SU01
Criteria No Submission 0 points
Emerging (F through D Range) (6-7) 7 points
Satisfactory (C Range) (7-8) 8 points
Proficient (B Range) (8-9) 9 points
Exemplary (A Range) (9-10) 10 points
Criterion Score
Explained how
one character
from your
chosen film or
television
show
demonstrated
interpersonal
communicatio
n skills
/ 10Student did not
submit
assignment
Work does not
meet assignment
expectations;
shows little or no
understanding of
assignment
concepts
Assignment
partially meets
expectations
with minimal
depth;
demonstrates a
limited
understanding of
the assignment
concepts
Assignment
meets
expectations
with all
components
being addressed;
demonstrates
the ability to
evaluate and
apply key
assignments
concepts
Assignment
exceeds
expectations
with exceptional
depth; presents
all requirements
of the
assignment;
demonstrates
the ability to
evaluate, apply
and synthesize
key assignment
concepts
Criteria No Submission 0 points
Emerging (F through D Range) (6-7) 7 points
Satisfactory (C Range) (7-8) 8 points
Proficient (B Range) (8-9) 9 points
Exemplary (A Range) (9-10) 10 points
Criterion Score
Criteria No Submission 0 points
Emerging (F through D Range) (6-7) 7 points
Satisfactory (C Range) (7-8) 8 points
Proficient (B Range) (8-9) 9 points
Exemplary (A Range) (9-10) 10 points
Criterion Score
Described the
character’s
listening style
and how he or
she adapted to
others from
different
cultures
/ 10Student did not
submit
assignment
Work does not
meet assignment
expectations;
shows little or no
understanding of
assignment
concepts
Assignment
partially meets
expectations
with minimal
depth;
demonstrates a
limited
understanding of
the assignment
concepts.
Assignment
meets
expectations
with all
components
being addressed;
demonstrates
the ability to
evaluate and
apply key
assignments
concepts
Assignment
exceeds
expectations
with exceptional
depth; presents
all requirements
of the
assignment;
demonstrates
the ability to
evaluate, apply
and synthesize
key assignment
concepts
Criteria No Submission 0 points
Emerging (F through D Range) (12-14) 14 points
Satisfactory (C Range) (14-16) 16 points
Proficient (B Range) (16-18) 18 points
Exemplary (A Range) (18-20) 20 points
Criterion Score
Criteria No Submission 0 points
Emerging (F through D Range) (12-14) 14 points
Satisfactory (C Range) (14-16) 16 points
Proficient (B Range) (16-18) 18 points
Exemplary (A Range) (18-20) 20 points
Criterion Score
Applied the
principles of
communicatio
n
accommodatio
n theory to an
analysis of the
character’s
behavior in the
selected movie
or television
show
/ 20Student did not
submit
assignment
Work does not
meet assignment
expectations;
shows little or no
understanding of
assignment
concepts
Assignment
partially meets
expectations
with minimal
depth;
demonstrates a
limited
understanding of
the assignment
concepts
Assignment
meets
expectations
with all
components
being addressed;
demonstrates
the ability to
evaluate and
apply key
assignments
concepts
Assignment
exceeds
expectations
with exceptional
depth; presents
all requirements
of the
assignment;
demonstrates
the ability to
evaluate, apply
and synthesize
key assignment
concepts
Criteria No Submission 0 points
Emerging (F through D Range) (6-7) 7 points
Satisfactory (C Range) (7-8) 8 points
Proficient (B Range) (8-9) 9 points
Exemplary (A Range) (9-10) 10 points
Criterion Score
Wrote in a
clear, concise,
and organized
manner;
/ 10Student did not
submit
assignment
Numerous issues
in any of the
following:
grammar,
Some spelling,
grammatical,
and/or structural
errors. Some
Minor errors in
grammar,
mechanics, or
spelling in the
Minor to no
errors in
grammar,
mechanics, or
Criteria No Submission 0 points
Emerging (F through D Range) (6-7) 7 points
Satisfactory (C Range) (7-8) 8 points
Proficient (B Range) (8-9) 9 points
Exemplary (A Range) (9-10) 10 points
Criterion Score
demonstrated
ethical
scholarship in
the accurate
representation
and attribution
of sources (i.e.,
APA format);
displayed
accurate
spelling,
grammar, and
professional
vocabulary
mechanics,
spelling, use of
slang, and
incomplete or
missing APA
citations and
references. If
required for the
assignment, did
not use course,
text, and/or
outside readings
(where relevant)
to support work.
errors in APA
formatting
(citations and
references). If
required for the
assignment,
utilizes sources
to support work
for initial post
but not
comments to
other students.
Sources include
course/text
readings but
outside sources
(when relevant)
include non-
academic/authori
tative, such as
Wikis and .com
resources.
initial posting.
Minor errors in
APA formatting
(citations and
references). If
required for the
assignment,
utilizes sources
to support work
for both the
initial post and
some of the
comments to
other students.
Sources include
course and text
readings as well
as outside
sources (when
relevant) that are
academic and
authoritative
(e.g., journal
articles, other
text books, .gov
web sites,
professional
spelling in both
the initial post
and comments to
others. APA
formatting is
correct. If
required for the
assignment,
utilizes sources
to support work
for both the
initial post and
the comments to
other students.
Sources include
course and text
readings as well
as outside
sources (when
relevant) that are
academic and
authoritative
(e.g., journal
articles, other
text books, .gov
web sites,
professional
Total / 50
Overall Score
Criteria No Submission 0 points
Emerging (F through D Range) (6-7) 7 points
Satisfactory (C Range) (7-8) 8 points
Proficient (B Range) (8-9) 9 points
Exemplary (A Range) (9-10) 10 points
Criterion Score
organization web
sites).
organization web
sites).
No Submission 0 points minimum
Emerging (F through D Range) 21 points minimum
Satisfactory (C Range) 40 points minimum
Proficient (B Range) 45 points minimum
Exemplary (A Range) 50 points minimum