Week 2 Project

profileSandy4tx
WEEK2PROJECTRUBRIC.pdf

Criteria No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F through D Range) (12-14) 13 points

Satisfactory (C Range) (14-16) 16 points

Proficient (B Range) (16-18) 18 points

Exemplary (A Range) (18-20) 20 points

C S

Evaluated

the

maximum

car

payment

and

mortgage

payment

you can

afford.

Did not identify the

maximum car

payment and

mortgage payment

you can afford.

Unsupported with

research.

Identified the

maximum car

payment and

mortgage payment

you can afford.

Lacked credible

research support.

Described the

maximum car

payment and

mortgage payment

you can afford.

Weakly supported

with research.

Evaluated the

maximum car

payment and

mortgage payment

you can afford.

Sufficiently

supported with

research.

Evaluation of the

maximum car

payment and

mortgage payment

you can afford was

compelling and

showed well-

developed logical

progression.

Well supported by

research.

Criteria No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F through D Range) (6-7) 7 points

Satisfactory (C Range) (7-8) 8 points

Proficient (B Range) (8-9) 9 points

Exemplary (A Range) (9-10) 10 points

Integrated a

complete

amortization

schedule for

the car.

Did not identify a

complete

amortization

schedule for the car.

Unsupported with

research.

Identified a

complete

amortization

schedule for the car.

Lacked credible

research support.

Described a

complete

amortization

schedule for the car.

Weakly supported

with research.

Integrated a

complete

amortization

schedule for the car.

Sufficiently

supported with

research.

Integration of a

complete

amortization

schedule for the car

was compelling and

showed well-

developed logical

progression.

Well supported by

research.

Criteria No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F through D Range) (6-7) 7 points

Satisfactory (C Range) (7-8) 8 points

Proficient (B Range) (8-9) 9 points

Exemplary (A Range) (9-10) 10 points

Analyzed

the

distributions

of principal,

interest and

the balance

over the life

of the loan.

Did not identify the

distributions of

principal, interest

and the balance

over the life of the

loan.

Unsupported with

research.

Identified the

distributions of

principal, interest

and the balance

over the life of the

loan.

Lacked credible

research support.

Described the

distributions of

principal, interest

and the balance

over the life of the

loan.

Weakly supported

with research.

Analyzed the

distributions of

principal, interest

and the balance

over the life of the

loan.

Sufficiently

supported with

research.

Analysis of the

distributions of

principal, interest

and the balance

over the life of the

loan was compelling

and actionable.

Well supported by

research.

Criteria No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F through D Range) (6-7) 7 points

Satisfactory (C Range) (7-8) 8 points

Proficient (B Range) (8-9) 9 points

Exemplary (A Range) (9-10) 10 points

Submission contains Submission contains Ideas are presented The reader can The writer’s overall

Total / 50

Overall Score

Close

Wrote in a

clear, concise,

and organized

manner;

demonstrated

ethical

scholarship in

accurate

representation

and

attribution of

sources (i.e.,

APA); and

displayed

accurate

spelling,

grammar, and

punctuation.

no discernible

overall intent in

author’s selection of

ideas.

Errors in basic

writing conventions

are sufficiently

numerous to

prevent reader

comprehension.

No attempt at

Academic/APA

formatting in

presentation

random

presentation of

ideas, which

prevents

understanding the

majority of author’s

overall intent.

Errors in basic

writing conventions

are sufficiently

numerous to

prevent reader

comprehension of

majority of the

work.

Academic/APA

format is attempted,

but errors are

significant.

in a way that forces

the reader to make

repeated inferences

in order to identify

and follow the

author’s overall

intent.

Errors in basic

writing conventions

interfere with, but

do not prevent,

reader

comprehension.

Academic/APA

format is attempted

but errors are

distracting.

follow the author’s

overall intent as

stated.

The reader noticed

a few errors in basic

writing conventions

but these few errors

do not interfere

with reader

comprehension.

Using

Academic/APA

format, accurately.

Errors are

noticeable but

minor.

argument and

language are clear

and tightly focused,

leaving the reader

with no room for

confusion about

author’s intent.

Text is basically

error free, so that a

reader would have

to purposely search

to find any errors

that may be

present.

Using

Academic/APA

format proficiently.

Text is basically

error free.

No Submission 0 points minimum

Emerging (F through D

Range) 35 points minimum

Satisfactory (C

Range) 40 points minimum

Proficient (B

Range) 45 points minimum

Exemplary (A

Range) 50 points minimum