Week 2 Project and Rubric Assessment PHE4095 Special Topics in Public Health

profilefewa46
Week2ProjectandRubricAssessmentPHE4095SpecialTopicsinPublicHealth.docx

Week 2 Project and Rubric Assessment PHE4095 Special Topics in Public Health

Due July 27 at 11:59 PM

Instructions

EPA and OSHA are regulatory agencies charged with protecting Americans from significant risks to human health, both environmental and occupational. Each agency develops and enforces regulations and maintains partnerships with other agencies to accomplish its mission.

EPA Website

OSHA Website

For this assignment, review the functions of the EPA and OSHA. Then, select one of the case studies from the websites provided below on a current health issue that is either environmental or occupational.

EPA Case Studies

EPA:WaterSense

EPA:Systematic Planning Case Studies

OSHA Case Study 1

OSHA Case Study 2

OSHA Case Study 3

OSHA Case Study 4

OSHA Case Study 5

OSHA Case Study 6

OSHA Case Study 7

Write a 3–4-page paper in Microsoft Word format addressing the following:

· Describe the selected current public health issue (either environmental or occupational).

· Analyze the factors that contributed to the public health issue.

· Consider the appropriate regulatory agency (EPA or OSHA) and examine how it responded to this situation.

· Examine the outcome of the response.

Support your statements with appropriate examples and scholarly references.

Submit your assignment to the Submissions Area by the due date assigned.

Name your document SUO_PHE4095_W2_A2_LastName_FirstInitial.doc.

Cite all sources using the APA fomat.

Rubric Assessment

Top of Form

This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method. Criteria

No Evidence

0 points

0 %

Unsatisfactory (F through D Range)

13 points

13 %

Emerging (C Range)

15 points

15 %

Proficient (B Range)

17 points

17 %

Exemplary (A Range)

20 points

20 %

Criterion Score

Describes the selected current public health issue (either environmental or occupational).

Add Feedback

Student did not submit assignment

Details of the selected current public health issue are vague or incomplete 

Details of the selected current public health issue are somewhat vague or incomplete. 

Details of health issue as well as the response methods in chronological order are somewhat vague or incomplete. 

Details of the selected current public health issue are complete and comprehensive. 

/ 20

/ 20

*

Criterion score has been overridden

Analyzes the factors that contributed to the public health issue.

Add Feedback

Student did not submit assignment

Details of the factors that contributed to the public health issue are vague or incomplete. 

Details of the factors that contributed to the public health issue are somewhat vague or incomplete. 

Details of appropriateness of response by both local and state officials involved in this issue are somewhat vague or incomplete. 

Details of the factors that contributed to the public health issue are complete and comprehensive. 

/ 20

/ 20

*

Criterion score has been overridden

Discusses the appropriate regulatory agency (EPA or OSHA) and the response to this situation.

Add Feedback

Student did not submit assignment

Details of outcome of the response to the public health issue are vague or incomplete.

Analysis is not accurate or complete. 

Details of the appropriate responding regulatory agency (EPA or OSHA) and their response are present but more could have been used to provide better application to the issue. 

Specific details of the readiness and proficiency of the city health officials in Milwaukee, Wisconsin are present but more could have been used to provide better application to the issue. 

Details of the appropriate responding regulatory agency (EPA or OSHA) and their response are present to support the issue. 

/ 20

/ 20

*

Criterion score has been overridden

Discusses the outcome of the response to the public health issue.

Add Feedback

Student did not submit assignment

Details of outcome of the response to the public health issue are vague or incomplete.

Analysis is not accurate or complete. 

Details of outcome of the response to the public health issue are present but more could have been used to provide better discussion to the issue. 

Details of more effective response methods for the public health response in this case study are present but more could have been used to provide better discussion to the issue. 

Details of outcome of the response to the public health issue are present to support the issue. 

/ 20

/ 20

*

Criterion score has been overridden

Written Components

Add Feedback

Student did not submit assignment

Introduction is limited or missing entirely.

Poorly organized document.

Transitions are infrequent, illogical, or missing entirely.

Conclusion is limited or missing entirely.

Writing contains numerous errors in spelling, grammar, or sentence structure that severely interferes with readability and comprehension.

No attempt at APA formatting. 

Introduction is present but incomplete or underdeveloped.

Poorly organized document that interferes with readability and comprehension.

Transitions are sporadic.

Conclusion is present but incomplete or underdeveloped.

Writing contains numerous errors in spelling, grammar, or sentence structure that interferes with readability and comprehension.

APA format demonstrates attempt to paraphrase, quote, and cite; but errors are significant. 

Introduction has a clear opening, provides background information, and states the topic.

Loosely organized document that may have to be inferred.

Transitions are appropriate and help the flow of ideas.

Conclusion summarizes main argument and has a clear ending.

Writing follows conventions of spelling and grammar throughout. Errors are infrequent and do not interfere with readability or comprehension.

APA format demonstrates attempt to paraphrase, quote, and cite; but a few errors present. 

Introduction catches the reader’s attention, provides compelling and appropriate background information, and clearly states the topic.

Well organized document with an appropriate introduction.

Transitions are thoughtful and clearly show how ideas relate.

Conclusion leaves the reader with a sense of closure and provides concluding insights.

Writing follows conventions of spelling and grammar throughout that helps establish a clear idea and aid the reader in following the writer’s logic.

APA format is used throughout when appropriate or called for. 

/ 20

/ 20

*

Criterion score has been overridden

Rubric Total Score Total Total Score

Clear Override

/ 100

/ 100

*

Criterion score has been overridden

Overall Score

Overall Score

No Evidence0 points minimum

Clear Override

Unsatisfactory (F through D Range)65 points minimum

Clear Override

Emerging (C Range)75 points minimum

Clear Override

Proficient (B Range)85 points minimum

Clear Override

Exemplary (A Range)100 points minimum

Clear Override

Overall Feedback

Close

Bottom of Form

-1710077886961

[{"c_rubricpreview

[{"3":["grid","pag

BVYYv39b7D9QsP