week 2 mapping

profiletaylorc1993
week2mapping.docx

RUNNING HEAD: Data analysis 1

By Day 1 of Week 1, your instructor will post student assignments for this discussion.  In previous coursework, you learned about the replacement of ICD9CM with ICD-10CM. When doing longitudinal studies or retroactive doing audits, the data may cover a time period where the two coding classifications may be used. In order to use the data, the data needs to be mapped.  In this discussion, students will select a partner to develop the mapping of a range of ICD 9CM codes to ICD10CM or ICD10CM to ICD9CM.

 

ICD9CM codes (Full range within the code)

ICD-10CM/PCS codes (Full range within the code)

960

O65

88

C22

664

G31

296

I23

 

ICD-10-CM Code Lookup (Links to an external site.)  (http://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Coding/ICD10/2014-ICD-10-CM-and-GEMs.html) ICD-10-PCS Code Lookup (Links to an external site.)  (http://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Coding/ICD10/2014-ICD-10-PCS.html)

Working together with your partner (collaborate), provide the following information for the range of codes:

· Individually, map the ICD 9CM to ICD10CM or ICD10CM to ICD 9CM

· Compare your individual mappings and reach consensus on the correct mapping.

· Students may collaborate by telephone, email, doc sharing, etc.

· Summarize your process and state whether your individual mapping matched or was there a collaborative effort for the final mapping.

· Comment on the ease or difficulty of the mapping process.

· Provide at least two examples of issues with mapping from one coding classification version to another version.

· Articulate the role of Health Information Management professionals in this type of data analytics process.