MGT3045 WK2 Discussion

SUO Discussion Rubric (80 Points) - Version 1.2 Course: BUS3041-Managerial Communications SU02

Response No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F-D: 1-27) 27 points

Satisfactory (C: 28-31) 31 points

Proficient (B: 32-35) 35 points

Exemplary (A: 36-40) 40 points

Criterion Score

Quality of Initial

Posting

/ 40No initial posting exists to

evaluate.

The information provided is

inaccurate, not focused on

the assignment’s topic,

and/or does not answer the

question(s) fully. Response

demonstrates incomplete

understanding of the topic

and/or inadequate

preparation.

The information provided is

accurate, giving a basic

understanding of the

topic(s) covered. A basic

understanding is when you

are able to describe the

terms and concepts

covered. Despite this basic

understanding, initial

posting may not include

complete development of

all aspects of the

assignment.

The information provided is

accurate, displaying a good

understanding of the

topic(s) covered. A good

understanding is when you

are able to explain the

terms and topics covered.

Initial posting

demonstrates sincere

reflection and addresses

most aspects of the

assignment, although all

concepts may not be fully

developed.

The information provided is

accurate, providing an in-

depth, well thought-out

understanding of the

topic(s) covered. An in-

depth understanding

provides an analysis of the

information, synthesizing

what is learned from the

course/assigned readings.

Participation No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F-D: 1-13) 13 points

Satisfactory (C: 14-16) 16 points

Proficient (B: 17-18) 18 points

Exemplary (A: 19-20) 20 points

Criterion Score

Participation in

Discussion

/ 20No responses to other

classmates were posted in

this discussion forum.

May include one or more of

the following:

*Comments to only one

other student's post.

*Comments are not

substantive, such as just

one line or saying, “Good

job” or “I agree.

*Comments are off topic.

Comments to two or more

classmates’ initial posts but

only on one day of the

week. Comments are

substantive, meaning they

reflect and expand on what

the other student wrote.

Comments to two or more

classmates’ initial posts on

more than one day.

Comments are substantive,

meaning they reflect and

expand on what the other

student wrote.

Comments to two or more

classmates’ initial posts and

to the instructor's

comment (if applicable) on

two or more days.

Responses demonstrate an

analysis of peers’

comments, building on

previous posts. Comments

extend and deepen

meaningful conversation

and may include a follow-

up question.

Total / 80

Overall Score

Writing No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F-D: 1-13) 13 points

Satisfaction (C: 14-16) 16 points

Proficient (B: 17-18) 18 points

Exemplary (A: 19-20) 20 points

Criterion ScoreWriting No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F-D: 1-13) 13 points

Satisfaction (C: 14-16) 16 points

Proficient (B: 17-18) 18 points

Exemplary (A: 19-20) 20 points

Criterion Score

Writing Mechanics

(Spelling, Grammar,

Citation Style) and

Information Literacy

/ 20No postings for which to

evaluate language and

grammar exist.

Numerous issues in any of

the following: grammar,

mechanics, spelling, use of

slang, and incomplete or

missing citations and

references. If required for

the assignment, did not use

course, text, and/or outside

readings (where relevant)

to support work.

Some spelling, grammatical,

and/or structural errors are

present. Some errors in

formatting citations and

references are present. If

required for the

assignment, utilizes sources

to support work for initial

post but not comments to

other students. Sources

include course/text

readings but outside

sources (when relevant)

include non-

academic/authoritative,

such as Wikis and .com

resources.

Minor errors in grammar,

mechanics, or spelling in

the initial posting are

present. Minor errors in

formatting citations and

references may exist. If

required for the

assignment, utilizes sources

to support work for both

the initial post and some of

the comments to other

students. Sources include

course and text readings as

well as outside sources

(when relevant) that are

academic and authoritative

(e.g., journal articles, other

text books, .gov Web sites,

professional organization

Web sites, cases, statutes,

or administrative rules).

Minor to no errors exist in

grammar, mechanics, or

spelling in both the initial

post and comments to

others. Formatting of

citations and references is

correct. If required for the

assignment, utilizes sources

to support work for both

the initial post and the

comments to other

students. Sources include

course and text readings as

well as outside sources

(when relevant) that are

academic and authoritative

(e.g., journal articles, other

text books, .gov Web sites,

professional organization

Web sites, cases, statutes,

or administrative rules).

No Submission 0 points minimum

There was no

submission for this

assignment.

Emerging (F to D Range) 1 point minimum

Satisfactory progress has not been met on

the competencies for this assignment.

Satisfactory (C Range) 56 points minimum

Satisfactory progress has been achieved on

the competencies for this assignment.

Proficient (B Range) 64 points minimum

Proficiency has been achieved on the

competencies for this assignment.

Exemplary (A Range) 72 points minimum

The competencies for this

assignment have been

mastered.