Week 2 Assignment
Week 2 Application Assignment Rubric
|
Criteria
|
1 Exemplary
|
2 Proficient
|
3 Progressing
|
4 Emerging
|
Score |
|
Meets Assignment Objectives Application: Applying Theory to Specific Settings and Populations · Briefly describe your work setting and client population.* · Briefly summarize the two theories you have selected. · Compare/Contrast them: Describe the similarities they share and their major differences. · Explain the strengths of these two theories as they relate to your setting and client population. · Describe the weaknesses you would have to address and, briefly, how you would address them. · Finally, briefly explain how you would apply these theories in your practice. |
Responsive to and exceeds the requirements
4 points
|
Responsive to and meets the requirements
3–3.5 points |
Somewhat responsive to the requirements
2–2.5 points |
Unresponsive to the requirements
0–1.5 points |
/4 |
|
Application of Knowledge
Demonstrates an ability to think about, use, and integrate course material.
|
In-depth understanding and application of concepts and issues presented in the course (e.g., insightful interpretations or analyses; accurate and perceptive parallels, ideas, opinions, examples, and conclusions)
4 points |
Basic understanding and application of the concepts and issues presented in the course demonstrating that the student has absorbed the general principles and ideas presented
3–3.5 points |
Minimal understanding and little application of concepts and issues presented in the course or, while generally accurate, displays some omissions and/or errors
2–2.5 points |
Lack of understanding and little or no application of the concepts and issues presented in the course; and/or the application is inaccurate and contains many omissions and/or errors
0–1.5 points |
/4 |
|
Writing demonstrates graduate-level writing.
|
Application meets graduate-level writing expectations, uses language that is clear and concise, has a few or no errors in grammar or syntax, is well organized and clear, and adheres to APA style with few or no mistakes
4 points |
Application meets most graduate-level writing expectations, uses language that is clear, has a few errors in grammar or syntax, is well organized and clear, and adheres to APA style with few mistakes
3–3.5 points |
Application partially meets graduate-level writing expectations, uses unclear and inappropriate language, has significant grammar or syntax errors, lacks organization, OR demonstrates significant issues with APA style.
2–2.5 points |
Application does not meet graduate-level writing expectations, uses unclear and inappropriate language, has significant grammar or syntax errors, lacks organization, AND demonstrates significant issues with APA style.
0–1.5 points |
/4 |
|
|
12 points 100% |
9–10.5 points 75–87.5% |
6–7.5 points 50–62.5% |
0–4.5 points 0–37.5% |
Total Score
/12 |
© 2015 Laureate Education, Inc. Page 2 of 2