Assignment Wk 2

profileJlm1128
Week2AssgnRubricNUR6050.pdf

8/29/22, 7:57 AMRubric Detail – Blackboard Learn

Page 1 of 3https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16998532_1&rubric_id=_3280050_1

Rubric Detail Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.

Excellent Good Fair Poor

Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid

Explain how each of the presidential administrations approached the issue.

Identify the allocations of resources that the two presidents dedicated to this issue.

18 (18%) - 20 (20%) The response clearly and accurately explains how the presidential administrations approached the issue and identi!es the resource allocations dedicated to the issue.

16 (16%) - 17 (17%) The response accurately explains how the presidential administrations approached the issue and identi!es the resource allocations dedicated to the issue.

14 (14%) - 15 (15%) The response is vague or partially inaccurate in its explanation of how the presidential administrations approached the issue, and/or in the identi!cation of the resources allocated to the issue.

0 (0%) - 13 (13%) The response is missing or inaccurate in its explanation of how the presidential administrations approached the issue, and/or in the identi!cation of the resources allocated to the issue.

Part 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis- Address the following:

Which administrative agency would most likely be responsible for helping you address the healthcare issue you selected? Why is this agency most helpful?

How do you think your selected healthcare issue might get on the agenda? How does it stay there?

Who would you choose to be the entrepreneur/ champion/sponsor of the healthcare issue you selected and justify your

23 (23%) - 25 (25%) The response clearly and accurately identi!es an administrative agency most likely to be responsible for addressing the selected healthcare issue and why that agency is most helpful.

Response clearly and accurately explains how the healthcare issue gets on the agenda and remains there.

The response clearly and accurately identi!es and justi!es the entrepreneur/champion/sponsor of the healthcare issue selected.

20 (20%) - 22 (22%) The response identi!es an administrative agency most likely to be responsible for addressing the selected healthcare issue and why that agency is most helpful.

Response clearly and accurately explains how the healthcare issue gets on the agenda and remains there.

Identi!cation and justi!cation of the entrepreneur/champion/sponsor of the healthcare issue is included.

18 (18%) - 19 (19%) The identi!cation of an administrative agency responsible for addressing the selected healthcare issue is vague or inaccurate and justi!cation is inaccurate or misaligned for why that agency is most helpful.

Explanation of how the healthcare issue gets on the agenda and remains there is vague or inaccurate.

Identi!cation and/or justi!cation of the entrepreneur/champion/sponsor of the healthcare issue selected is inaccurate or does not align with the healthcare issue.

0 (0%) - 17 (17%) Identi!cation of an administrative agency responsible for addressing the selected healthcare issue is missing.

Explanation of how the healthcare issue gets on the agenda and remains there is inaccurate or missing.

Identi!cation and/or justi!cation of the entrepreneur/champion/sponsor of the healthcare issue selected is inaccurate or missing.

Name: NURS_6050_Module01_Week02_Assignment_Rubric EXIT

Grid View List View

8/29/22, 7:57 AMRubric Detail – Blackboard Learn

Page 2 of 3https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16998532_1&rubric_id=_3280050_1

selection.

Part 3: Fact Sheet

Based on your Agenda Comparison Grid for the healthcare issue you selected, develop a 1-2-page narrative that you could use to communicate with a policy- maker/legislator or a member of their sta! for this healthcare issue.

Summarize why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation.

Justify the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues

27 (27%) - 30 (30%) Creates an accurate and thorough fact sheet.

Using su"cient evidence, the response provides an accurate synthesis of evidence on why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation.

Response accurately justi!es the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues.

24 (24%) - 26 (26%) Creates an accurate fact sheet.

Using su"cient evidence, the response provides an accurate summary evidence on why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation.

Response accurately justi!es the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues.

21 (21%) - 23 (23%) Creates a fact sheet that is partially accurate or incomplete.

Response provides an incomplete or inaccurate summary of evidence on why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation.

Response partially or inaccurately justi!es the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues.

0 (0%) - 20 (20%) Creates a fact sheet that is inaccurate or incomplete.

Response provides an inaccurate summary of evidence or evidence is missing on why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation.

Response justifying the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues is inaccurate and incomplete or missing.

Resources 10 (10%) - 10 (10%) Response includes 3 or more course resources and 2 or more outside sources.

8 (8%) - 8 (8%) Response includes 2-3 course resources and 2 outside sources.

7 (7%) - 7 (7%) Response includes fewer than 2 course resources and/or fewer than 2 outside resources.

0 (0%) - 6 (6%) Response includes 2 or fewer resources.

Written Expression and Formatting: Paragraph

Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, low logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused--neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.

5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for #ow, continuity, and clarity.

4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for #ow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.

3 (3%) - 3 (3%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for #ow, continuity, and clarity 60%-79% of the time.

0 (0%) - 2 (2%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for #ow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.

Written Expression and Formatting: English Writing Standards

Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper

5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 (3%) - 3 (3%) Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

0 (0%) - 2 (2%) Contains many (≥5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

8/29/22, 7:57 AMRubric Detail – Blackboard Learn

Page 3 of 3https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16998532_1&rubric_id=_3280050_1

punctuation.

Written Expression and Formatting:

The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, indentations, parenthetical/in- text citations, and reference list.

5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Uses correct APA format with no errors.

4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors.

3 (3%) - 3 (3%) Contains several (3-4) APA format errors.

0 (0%) - 2 (2%) Contains many (≥5) APA format errors.

Total Points: 100

Name: NURS_6050_Module01_Week02_Assignment_Rubric

EXIT