week 2

1 No submission  0.00%

2 Insufficient 65.00%

3 Approaching 75.00%

4 Acceptable 85.00%

5 Target 100.00%

100.0 %Criteria

30.0 %Part 1: Lesson Plan Analysis

Not addressed.

Lesson plan analysis is inaccurate or convoluted, and does not demonstrate clear understanding of the lesson plan template.

Lesson plan analysis is elementary, and demonstrates only a basic understanding of the lesson plan template.

Lesson plan analysis is detailed, and demonstrates clear understanding of the lesson plan template.

Lesson plan analysis is comprehensive, and demonstrates substantial understanding of the lesson plan template.

5.0 %Academic Standard

Not addressed.

The grade level and academic standard are incorrectly identified, or do not relate to one another.

The grade level and related academic standard are sufficiently identified

The grade level and academic standard is correctly identified and clearly related.

The grade level and academic standard are specifically identified and expertly related.

10.0 %KNOW Learning Objective

Not addressed.

The KNOW learning objective is vague and demonstrates unclear expectations of student outcomes. Rationale is unclear or irrelevant to support alignment of the academic standard and the objective.

The KNOW learning objective is adequate and demonstrates sufficient expectations of student outcomes. Rationale is simple and broadly supports alignment of the academic standard and the objective.

The KNOW learning objective is reasonable and demonstrates appropriate expectations of student outcomes. Rationale is logical and directly supports alignment of the academic standard and the objective.

The KNOW learning objective is expertly crafted and demonstrates higher-order thinking in identifying expectations of student outcomes. Rationale is compelling and proficiently supports alignment of the academic standard and the objective.

10.0 %UNDERSTAND Learning Objective

Not addressed.

The UNDERSTAND learning objective is vague and demonstrates unclear expectations of student outcomes. Rationale is unclear or irrelevant to support alignment of the academic standard and the objective.

The UNDERSTAND learning objective is adequate and demonstrates sufficient expectations of student outcomes. Rationale is simple and broadly supports alignment of the academic standard and the objective.

The UNDERSTAND learning objective is reasonable and demonstrates appropriate expectations of student outcomes. Rationale is logical and directly supports alignment of the academic standard and the objective.

The UNDERSTAND learning objective is expertly crafted and demonstrates higher-order thinking in identifying expectations of student outcomes. Rationale is compelling and proficiently supports alignment of the academic standard and the objective.

10.0 %DO Learning Objective

Not addressed.

The DO learning objective is vague and demonstrates unclear expectations of student outcomes. Rationale is unclear or irrelevant to support alignment of the academic standard and the objective.

The DO learning objective is adequate and demonstrates sufficient expectations of student outcomes. Rationale is simple and broadly supports alignment of the academic standard and the objective.

The DO learning objective is reasonable and demonstrates appropriate expectations of student outcomes. Rationale is logical and directly supports alignment of the academic standard and the objective.

The DO learning objective is expertly crafted and demonstrates higher-order thinking in identifying expectations of student outcomes. Rationale is compelling and proficiently supports alignment of the academic standard and the objective.

15.0 %Lesson Summary and Central Focus

Not addressed.

Summary of the lesson and focus is not presented well or not aligned to the standard and objectives.

Summary of the lesson and focus is underdeveloped and minimally aligned to the standard and objectives.

Summary of the lesson and focus is detailed and clearly aligned to the standard and objectives.

Summary of the lesson and focus is substantial and creative, and expertly aligned to the standard and objectives.

10.0 %Organization

Not addressed.

An attempt is made to organize the content, but the sequence is indiscernible. The ideas presented are compartmentalized; may not relate to each other.

The content is adequately organized, generally providing the audience with a sense of the main idea.

The content is logically organized. The ideas presented relate to each other. The content provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea.

The content is well organized and logical. There is a sequential progression of ideas related to each other. The content is presented as a cohesive unit. Provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea.

10.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

Not addressed.

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction are used.

Submission includes mechanical errors, but they do not hinder comprehension. Includes some appropriate practice and content-related language.

Submission is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few are present. Includes appropriate practice and content-related language.

Submission is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and content-related language.

100 %Total Weightage