PHARMACOTHERAPY FOR CARDIOVASCULAR DISORDERS

Criteria Ratings Pts

25 pts

30 pts

30 pts

Explain how the factor you selected might influence the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes in the patient from the case study you were assigned.

25 to >22.5 pts Excellent

The response accurately and completely explains in detail how the factor selected might influence the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes in the patient.

22.5 to >19.75 pts Good

The response provides a basic explanation of how the factor selected might influence the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes in the patient.

19.75 to >17.25 pts Fair

The response inaccurately or vaguely explains how the factor selected might influence the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes in the patient.

17.25 to >0 pts Poor

The response inaccurately and vaguely explains how the factor selected might influence the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes in the patient, or is missing.

Describe how changes in the processes might impact the patient's recommended drug therapy. Be specific and provide examples.

30 to >26.7 pts Excellent The response accurately and completely describes in detail how changes in the processes might impact the patient's recommended drug therapy. ... Accurate, complete, and aligned examples are provided to support the response.

26.7 to >23.7 pts Good The response accurately describes how changes in the processes might impact the patient's recommended drug therapy. ... Accurate examples may be provided to support the response.

23.7 to >20.7 pts Fair The response inaccurately or vaguely describes how changes in the processes might impact the patient's recommended drug therapy. ... Inaccurate or vague examples are provided to support the response.

20.7 to >0 pts Poor The response inaccurately and vaguely describes how changes in the processes might impact the patient's recommended drug therapy, or is missing. ... Inaccurate and vague examples may be provided to support the response, or is missing.

Explain how you might improve the patient's drug therapy plan, and explain why you would make these recommended improvements.

30 to >26.7 pts Excellent

The response accurately and clearly explains in detail how to improve the patient's drug therapy plan. ...

26.7 to >23.7 pts Good

The response accurately explains how to improve the patient's drug therapy plan. ... The response may include an accurate

23.7 to >20.7 pts Fair

The response inaccurately or vaguely explains how to improve the patient's drug therapy plan. ... The response may

20.7 to >0 pts Poor

The response inaccurately and vaguely explains how to improve the patient's drug therapy plan, or is missing. ... The

Criteria Ratings Pts

5 pts

5 pts

5 pts

The response includes an accurate and detailed explanation to support the recommended improvements.

explanation to support the recommended improvements.

include an inaccurate, vague, or misaligned explanation to support the recommended improvements.

response may include an inaccurate and vague explanation to support the recommended improvements, or is missing.

Written Expression and Formatting - Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused--neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.

5 to >4.45 pts Excellent Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.

4.45 to >3.95 pts Good Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.

3.95 to >3.45 pts Fair Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time.

3.45 to >0 pts Poor Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity less than 60% of the time.

Written Expression and Formatting - English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

5 to >4.45 pts Excellent Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors

4.45 to >3.95 pts Good Contains a few (1– 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors

3.95 to >3.45 pts Fair Contains several (3–4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors

3.45 to >0 pts Poor Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding

Written Expression and Formatting - The paper follows

5 to >4.45 pts Excellent

Uses correct APA format with no

4.45 to >3.95 pts Good

Contains a few (1– 2) APA format

3.95 to >3.45 pts Fair

Contains several (3–4) APA format

3.45 to >0 pts Poor

Contains many (≥ 5) APA format

Total Points: 100

Criteria Ratings Pts

correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in- text citations, and reference list.

errors errors errors errors