EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE AND THE QUADRUPLE AIM

NURS_6052_Module01_Week01_Assignment_Rubric

Criteria Ratings Pts

85 pts

Write a brief analysis of the connection between evidence-based practice and the Quadruple Aim. Your analysis should address how evidence- based practice might (or might not) help reach the Quadruple Aim, including each of the four measures of:· Patient experience· Population health· Costs· Work life of healthcare providers

85 to >76.0 pts Excellent The analysis clearly and accurately addresses in detail how evidence-based practice either supports or does not support the Quadruple Aim. ... The analysis accurately and thoroughly explains in detail how the four measures of patient experience, population health, costs, and work- life of healthcare providers either supports or does not support the Quadruple Aim. ... The analysis provides a complete, detailed, and specific synthesis of two outside resources reviewed on the four measures supporting or not supporting the Quadruple Aim. The response fully integrates at least two outside resources and two or three course-specific resources that fully support the analysis provided with credible and detailed examples.

76 to >67.0 pts Good The analysis accurately addresses how evidence-based practice either supports or does not support the Quadruple Aim. ... The analysis accurately explains how the four measures of patient experience, population health, and work life of healthcare providers either supports or does not support the Quadruple Aim. ... The analysis provides an accurate synthesis of at least one outside resource reviewed on the four measures supporting or not supporting the Quadruple Aim. The response integrates at least 1 outside resource and two or three course- specific resources that may support the analysis provided and may include some detailed examples.

67 to >59.0 pts Fair The analysis inaccurately or vaguely addresses how evidence-based practice either supports or does not support the Quadruple Aim. ... The analysis inaccurately or vaguely explains how the four measures of patient experience, population health, and work life of healthcare providers either supports or does not support the Quadruple Aim. ... The analysis provides an inaccurate or vague analysis of the four measures supporting or not supporting the Quadruple Aim with a vague or inaccurate analysis of outside resources. The response minimally integrates resources that may support the analysis provided and may include vague or inaccurate examples.

59 to >0 pts Poor The analysis inaccurately and vaguely addresses how evidence- based practice either supports or does not support the Quadruple Aim or is missing. ... The analysis inaccurately and vaguely explains how the four measures of patient experience, population health, and work life of healthcare providers either supports or does not support the Quadruple Aim or is missing. ... The analysis provides a vague and inaccurate analysis of the four measures supporting or not supporting the Quadruple Aim with a vague and inaccurate analysis of outside resources. The response fails to integrate any resources to support the analysis provided or is missing.

Total Points: 100

Criteria Ratings Pts

5 pts

5 pts

5 pts

Written Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Development and Organization:Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.

5 to >4.0 pts Excellent Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. ... A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.

4 to >3.5 pts Good Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. ... Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated yet is brief and not descriptive.

3.5 to >3.0 pts Fair Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60–79% of the time. ... Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.

3 to >0 pts Poor Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity less than 60% of the time. ... No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.

Written Expression and Formatting—English Writing Standards:Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation.

5 to >4.0 pts Excellent Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 to >3.5 pts Good Contains a few (one or two) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3.5 to >3.0 pts Fair Contains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 to >0 pts Poor Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

Written Expression and Formatting—The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.

5 to >4.0 pts Excellent Uses correct APA format with no errors.

4 to >3.5 pts Good Contains a few (one or two) APA format errors.

3.5 to >3.0 pts Fair Contains several (three or four) APA format errors.

3 to >0 pts Poor Contains many (five or more) APA format errors.