BUS3041 WK1 Project

BUS3041 Week 1 Project Rubric Course: BUS3041-Managerial Communications SU02

Criteria No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F through D range) (1–6) 6 points

Satisfactory (C range) (7) 7 points

Proficient (B range) (8) 8 points

Exemplary (A range) (9– 10) 10 points

Criterion Score

Clarified your

purpose(s) for

communicating

with the employees

at the Nebraska

Plant

/ 10Did not identify

purpose(s) for

communicating with

the employees at the

Nebraska Plant.

Unsupported with

research.

Identified purpose(s)

for communicating

with the employees

at the Nebraska

Plant.

Lacked credible

research support.

Described purpose(s)

for communicating

with the employees

at the Nebraska

Plant.

Weakly supported

with research.

Clarified purpose(s)

for communicating

with the employees

at the Nebraska

Plant.

Sufficiently

supported with

research.

Clarification of

purpose(s) for

communicating with

the employees at the

Nebraska Plant was

compelling and

showed well-

developed logical

progression.

Well supported by

research.

Criteria No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F through D range) (1–6) 6 points

Satisfactory (C range) (7) 7 points

Proficient (B range) (8) 8 points

Exemplary (A range) (9– 10) 10 points

Criterion Score

Criteria No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F through D range) (1–6) 6 points

Satisfactory (C range) (7) 7 points

Proficient (B range) (8) 8 points

Exemplary (A range) (9– 10) 10 points

Criterion Score

Determined your

primary message by

using one of the

idea-generation

approaches form

the text reading.

/ 10Did not identify

message.

Unsupported with

research.

dentified message.

Lacked credible

research support.

Described primary

message.

Weakly supported

with research.

Determined your

primary message by

using one of the

idea-generation

approaches form the

text reading.

Sufficiently

supported with

research.

Determination of

your primary

message by using

one of the idea-

generation

approaches form the

text reading was

compelling and

showed well-

developed logical

progression.

Well supported by

research.

Criteria No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F through D range) (1–13) 13 points

Satisfactory (C range) (14–15) 15 points

Proficient (B range) (16–17) 17 points

Exemplary (A range) (18–20) 20 points

Criterion Score

Created a message

to the employees,

paying careful

attention to the

organization and

presentation

method

/ 20Did not identify

message.

Unsupported with

research

Identified message.

Lacked credible

research support.

Described message

to the employees.

Weakly supported

with research.

Created message to

the employees,

paying careful

attention to the

organization and

presentation method.

Sufficiently

supported with

research.

Creation of message

to the employees,

paying careful

attention to the

organization and

presentation method

was compelling and

actionable with well-

developed logical

progression.

Well supported by

research.

Total / 50

Overall Score

Criteria No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F through D range) (1–6) 6 points

Satisfactory (C range) (7) 7 points

Proficient (B range) (8) 8 points

Exemplary (A range) (9– 10) 10 points

Criterion ScoreCriteria No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F through D range) (1–6) 6 points

Satisfactory (C range) (7) 7 points

Proficient (B range) (8) 8 points

Exemplary (A range) (9– 10) 10 points

Criterion Score

Wrote in a clear,

concise, and

organized manner;

demonstrated

ethical scholarship

in accurate

representation and

attribution of

sources (i.e., APA);

and displayed

accurate spelling,

grammar, and

punctuation.

Communication:

Use of tone, word

choice, audien

/ 10Submission contains

no discernible overall

intent in author’s

selection of ideas.

Errors in basic

writing conventions

are sufficiently

numerous to prevent

reader

comprehension.

No attempt at

Academic/APA

formatting in

presentation

Submission contains

random presentation

of ideas, which

prevents

understanding the

majority of author’s

overall intent.

Errors in basic

writing conventions

are sufficiently

numerous to prevent

reader

comprehension of

majority of the work.

Academic/APA

format is attempted,

but errors are

significant.

Ideas are presented

in a way that forces

the reader to make

repeated inferences

in order to identify

and follow the

author’s overall

intent.

Errors in basic

writing conventions

interfere with, but do

not prevent, reader

comprehension.

Academic/APA

format is attempted

but errors are

distracting.

The reader can

follow the author’s

overall intent as

stated.

The reader noticed a

few errors in basic

writing conventions

but these few errors

do not interfere with

reader

comprehension.

Using Academic/APA

format, accurately.

Errors are noticeable

but minor.

The writer’s overall

argument and

language are clear

and tightly focused,

leaving the reader

with no room for

confusion about

author’s intent.

Text is basically error

free, so that a reader

would have to

purposely search to

find any errors that

may be present.

Using Academic/APA

format proficiently.

Text is basically error

free.

No Submission 0 points minimum

Emerging (F through D range) 1 point minimum

Satisfactory (C range) 35 points minimum

Proficient (B range) 40 points minimum

Exemplary (A range) 45 points minimum