BUS4101 Week 1 Project
BUS4101 Week 1 Project Rubric Course: BUS4101-Quality Management SU01
Criteria No Submission 0 points
Emerging (F through D Range) (6-7) 7 points
Satisfactory (C Range) (7-8) 8 points
Proficient (B Range) (8-9) 9 points
Exemplary (A Range) (9-10) 10 points
Criterion Score
Explained the
company's
reasoning for
entering the
windshield
wiper market
(as opposed to
some other
product
offering).
/ 10Did not identify
reasoning.
Unsupported
with research.
Identified
reasoning.
Lacked credible
research support.
Described
reasoning.
Weakly
supported with
research.
Explained why
the company
would choose
the windshield
wiper market for
expansion.
Sufficiently
supported with
research.
Clearly explained
why the
company would
choose to select
the windshield
wiper market to
enter.
Well supported
by research.
Criteria No Submission 0 points
Emerging (F through D Range) (6-7) 7 points
Satisfactory (C Range) (7-8) 8 points
Proficient (B Range) (8-9) 9 points
Exemplary (A Range) (9-10) 10 points
Criterion Score
Criteria No Submission 0 points
Emerging (F through D Range) (6-7) 7 points
Satisfactory (C Range) (7-8) 8 points
Proficient (B Range) (8-9) 9 points
Exemplary (A Range) (9-10) 10 points
Criterion Score
Performed a
SWOT analysis
of the
company's
situation.
/ 10Did not identify
SWOT
components.
Unsupported
with research.
Identified SWOT
components.
Lacked credible
research support.
Described SWOT
components.
Weakly
supported with
research.
Analyzed the
strengths,
weaknesses,
opportunities,
and threats faced
by the
organization.
Sufficiently
supported with
research.
Thoroughly
analyzed all
strengths,
weaknesses,
opportunities,
and threats faced
by the
organization.
Well supported
by research.
Criteria No Submission 0 points
Emerging (F through D Range) (6-7) 7 points
Satisfactory (C Range) (7-8) 8 points
Proficient (B Range) (8-9) 9 points
Exemplary (A Range) (9-10) 10 points
Criterion Score
Criteria No Submission 0 points
Emerging (F through D Range) (6-7) 7 points
Satisfactory (C Range) (7-8) 8 points
Proficient (B Range) (8-9) 9 points
Exemplary (A Range) (9-10) 10 points
Criterion Score
Analyzed the
impact on
quality due to
company's
attempt to
expand its
product line.
/ 10Did not identify
impact.
Unsupported
with research.
Identified impact.
Lacked credible
research support.
Described
impact.
Weakly
supported with
research.
Analyzed the
impact on quality
due to the
company’s
attempt to
expand its
product line.
Sufficiently
supported with
research.
Clearly analyzed
how the
attention paid to
the new product
could impact the
production of the
old product.
Well supported
by research.
Criteria No Submission 0 points
Emerging (F through D Range) (6-7) 7 points
Satisfactory (C Range) (7-8) 8 points
Proficient (B Range) (8-9) 9 points
Exemplary (A Range) (9-10) 10 points
Criterion Score
Criteria No Submission 0 points
Emerging (F through D Range) (6-7) 7 points
Satisfactory (C Range) (7-8) 8 points
Proficient (B Range) (8-9) 9 points
Exemplary (A Range) (9-10) 10 points
Criterion Score
Explained how
quality can be
measured in an
industry such
as the
passenger tire
market.
/ 10Did not identify
measure of
quality.
Unsupported
with research.
Identified
measure of
quality.
Lacked credible
research support.
Described
measure of
quality.
Weakly
supported with
research.
Explained
measures that
could be used in
discussing
quality in the
passenger tire
market.
Sufficiently
supported with
research.
Offered a clear
explanation of
the measures
that could be
used to measure
quality in the
passenger tire
market.
Well supported
by research.
Criteria No Submission 0 points
Emerging (F through D Range) (6-7) 7 points
Satisfactory (C Range) (7-8) 8 points
Proficient (B Range) (8-9) 9 points
Exemplary (A Range) (9-10) 10 points
Criterion Score
Criteria No Submission 0 points
Emerging (F through D Range) (6-7) 7 points
Satisfactory (C Range) (7-8) 8 points
Proficient (B Range) (8-9) 9 points
Exemplary (A Range) (9-10) 10 points
Criterion Score
Wrote in a
clear, concise,
and organized
manner;
demonstrated
ethical
scholarship in
accurate
representation
and attribution
of sources (i.e.,
APA); and
displayed
accurate
spelling,
grammar, and
punctuation.
/ 10Submission
contains no
discernible
overall intent in
author’s
selection of
ideas.
Errors in basic
writing
conventions are
sufficiently
numerous to
prevent reader
comprehension.
No attempt at
Academic/APA
formatting in
presentation
Submission
contains random
presentation of
ideas, which
prevents
understanding
the majority of
author’s overall
intent.
Errors in basic
writing
conventions are
sufficiently
numerous to
prevent reader
comprehension
of majority of the
work.
Academic/APA
format is
attempted, but
errors are
significant.
Ideas are
presented in a
way that forces
the reader to
make repeated
inferences in
order to identify
and follow the
author’s overall
intent.
Errors in basic
writing
conventions
interfere with,
but do not
prevent, reader
comprehension.
Academic/APA
format is
attempted but
errors are
distracting.
The reader can
follow the
author’s overall
intent as stated.
The reader
noticed a few
errors in basic
writing
conventions but
these few errors
do not interfere
with reader
comprehension.
Using
Academic/APA
format,
accurately. Errors
are noticeable
but minor.
The writer’s
overall argument
and language are
clear and tightly
focused, leaving
the reader with
no room for
confusion about
author’s intent.
Text is basically
error free, so
that a reader
would have to
purposely search
to find any errors
that may be
present.
Using
Academic/APA
format
proficiently. Text
is basically error
free.
Total / 50
Overall Score
No Submission 0 points minimum
Emerging (F through D Range) 35 points minimum
Satisfactory (C Range) 40 points minimum
Proficient (B Range) 45 points minimum
Exemplary (A Range) 50 points minimum