FIN4060 Week 1 Project
Sandy4tx
Week1ProjectRubric.pdf
FIN4060 Week 1 Project Rubric Course: FIN4060-Financial Statement Analysis SU01
Criteria No Submission 0 points
Emerging (F through D Range) (12-14) 14 points
Satisfactory (C Range) (14-16) 16 points
Proficient (B Range) (16-18) 18 points
Exemplary (A Range) (18-20) 20 points
Criterion Score
Analyzed the
key
characteristics
of the
companies
selected, such
as the industry
in which they
operate, the
products they
provide, their
rankings in the
industry, etc.
/ 20Did not identify the key characteristics
of the companies
selected, such as
the industry in
which they operate,
the products they
provide, their
rankings in the
industry, etc.
Unsupported with
research.
Identified the key
characteristics of
the companies
selected, such as
the industry in
which they operate,
the products they
provide, their
rankings in the
industry, etc.
Lacked credible
research support.
Described the key
characteristics of
the companies
selected, such as
the industry in
which they operate,
the products they
provide, their
rankings in the
industry, etc.
Weakly supported
with research.
Analyzed the key
characteristics of
the companies
selected, such as
the industry in
which they operate,
the products they
provide, their
rankings in the
industry, etc.
Sufficiently
supported with
research.
Analysis of the key
characteristics of
the companies
selected, such as
the industry in
which they operate,
the products they
provide, their
rankings in the
industry, etc was
compelling and
showed well-
developed logical
progression.
Well supported by
research.
Criteria No Submission 0 points
Emerging (F through D Range) (6-7) 7 points
Satisfactory (C Range) (7-8) 8 points
Proficient (B Range) (8-9) 9 points
Exemplary (A Range) (9-10) 10 points
Criterion Score
Criteria No Submission 0 points
Emerging (F through D Range) (6-7) 7 points
Satisfactory (C Range) (7-8) 8 points
Proficient (B Range) (8-9) 9 points
Exemplary (A Range) (9-10) 10 points
Criterion Score
Evaluated the
company's
commitment to
corporate
governance and
identify the key
features of its
commitment.
/ 10Did not identify
the company's
commitment to
corporate
governance and
identify the key
features of its
commitment.
Unsupported
with research.
Identified the
company's
commitment to
corporate
governance and
identify the key
features of its
commitment.
Lacked credible
research
support.
Described the
company's
commitment to
corporate
governance and
identify the key
features of its
commitment.
Weakly supported
with research.
Evaluated the
company's
commitment to
corporate
governance and
identify the key
features of its
commitment.
Sufficiently
supported with
research.
Evaluation of the
company's
commitment to
corporate
governance and
identify the key
features of its
commitment was
compelling and
showed well-
developed logical
progression.
Well supported by
research.
Criteria No Submission 0 points
Emerging (F through D Range) (6-7) 7 points
Satisfactory (C Range) (7-8) 8 points
Proficient (B Range) (8-9) 9 points
Exemplary (A Range) (9-10) 10 points
Criterion Score
Criteria No Submission 0 points
Emerging (F through D Range) (6-7) 7 points
Satisfactory (C Range) (7-8) 8 points
Proficient (B Range) (8-9) 9 points
Exemplary (A Range) (9-10) 10 points
Criterion Score
Analyzed the
main
competitors for
each selected
company.
/ 10Did not identify the main competitors
for each selected
company.
Unsupported with
research.
Identified the main
competitors for
each selected
company.
Lacked credible
research support.
Described the main
competitors for
each selected
company.
Weakly supported
with research.
Analyzed the main
competitors for
each selected
company.
Sufficiently
supported with
research.
Analysis of the
main competitors
for each selected
company was
compelling and
actionable.
Well supported by
research.
Criteria No Submission 0 points
Emerging (F through D Range) (6-7) 7 points
Satisfactory (C Range) (7-8) 8 points
Proficient (B Range) (8-9) 9 points
Exemplary (A Range) (9-10) 10 points
Criterion Score
Total / 50
Criteria No Submission 0 points
Emerging (F through D Range) (6-7) 7 points
Satisfactory (C Range) (7-8) 8 points
Proficient (B Range) (8-9) 9 points
Exemplary (A Range) (9-10) 10 points
Criterion Score
Wrote in a clear,
concise, and
organized
manner;
demonstrated
ethical
scholarship in
accurate
representation
and attribution
of sources (i.e.,
APA); and
displayed
accurate
spelling,
grammar, and
punctuation.
/ 10Submission contains no
discernible overall
intent in author’s
selection of ideas.
Errors in basic
writing conventions
are sufficiently
numerous to
prevent reader
comprehension.
No attempt at
Academic/APA
formatting in
presentation
Submission
contains random
presentation of
ideas, which
prevents
understanding
the majority of
author’s overall
intent.
Errors in basic
writing conventions
are sufficiently
numerous to
prevent reader
comprehension of
majority of the
work.
Academic/APA
format is
attempted, but
errors are
significant.
Ideas are presented
in a way that forces
the reader to make
repeated inferences
in order to identify
and follow the
author’s overall
intent.
Errors in basic
writing conventions
interfere with, but
do not prevent,
reader
comprehension.
Academic/APA
format is attempted
but errors are
distracting.
The reader can
follow the author’s
overall intent as
stated.
The reader
noticed a few
errors in basic
writing conventions
but these few
errors do not
interfere with
reader
comprehension.
Using
Academic/APA
format, accurately.
Errors are
noticeable but
minor.
The writer’s overall
argument and
language are clear
and tightly focused,
leaving the reader
with no room
for confusion about
author’s intent.
Text is basically
error free, so that a
reader would have
to purposely search
to find any errors
that may be
present.
Using
Academic/APA
format proficiently.
Text is basically
error free.
Overall Score
No Submission 0 points minimum
Emerging (F through D Range) 35 points minimum
Satisfactory (C Range) 40 points minimum
Proficient (B Range) 45 points minimum
Exemplary (A Range) 50 points minimum
