MGT3059 Week 1 Project

MGT3059 Week 1 Project Rubric Course: MGT3059-Operations Management SU01

Criteria No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F through D Range) (18-21) 21 points

Satisfactory (C Range) (21- 24) 24 points

Proficient (B Range) (24- 27) 27 points

Exemplary (A Range) (27- 30) 30 points

Criterion Score

Identified a possible

solution to speed up

the delivery of

products to customers.

/ 30Did not propose any solutions to speed up the

delivery of products.

Identified a solution that

would not change the

speed of the delivery of

products or would slow it

down.

Made a suggestion that

might or might not be

successful in speeding up

delivery of products.

Identified a possible

solution to speed up the

delivery of products.

Suggested creative,

compelling and insightful

solutions to speed up the

delivery of products.

Criteria No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F through D Range) (6-7) 7 points

Satisfactory (C Range) (7- 8) 8 points

Proficient (B Range) (8-9) 9 points

Exemplary (A Range) (9- 10) 10 points

Criterion Score

Discussed negative

consequences or

disadvantages of the

proposed solution.

/ 10Did not identify consequences or

disadvantages of the

proposed solution.

Identified consequences

for the organization.

Described consequences

but was unclear as to

whether or not they would

be disadvantages.

Discussed negative

consequences or

disadvantages of the

proposed solution.

Provided compelling

discussion of negative

consequences or

disadvantages of the

proposed solution.

Criteria No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F through D Range) (6-7) 7 points

Satisfactory (C Range) (7- 8) 8 points

Proficient (B Range) (8-9) 9 points

Exemplary (A Range) (9- 10) 10 points

Criterion Score

Wrote in a clear,

concise, and organized

manner; demonstrated

ethical scholarship in

accurate

representation and

attribution of sources

(i.e., APA); and

displayed accurate

spelling, grammar, and

punctuation.

Communication: Use

of tone, word choice,

audien

/ 10Submission contains no discernible overall intent in

author’s selection of ideas.

Errors in basic writing

conventions are

sufficiently numerous to

prevent reader

comprehension.

No attempt at

Academic/APA formatting

in presentation

Submission contains

random presentation of

ideas, which prevents

understanding the majority

of author’s overall intent.

Errors in basic writing

conventions are

sufficiently numerous to

prevent reader

comprehension of majority

of the work.

Academic/APA format is

attempted, but errors are

significant.

Ideas are presented in a

way that forces the reader

to make repeated

inferences in order to

identify and follow the

author’s overall intent.

Errors in basic writing

conventions interfere with,

but do not prevent, reader

comprehension.

Academic/APA format is

attempted but errors are

distracting.

The reader can follow the

author’s overall intent as

stated.

The reader noticed a few

errors in basic writing

conventions but these few

errors do not interfere with

reader comprehension.

Using Academic/APA

format, accurately. Errors

are noticeable but minor.

The writer’s overall

argument and language are

clear and tightly focused,

leaving the reader with no

room for confusion about

author’s intent.

Text is basically error free,

so that a reader would

have to purposely search

to find any errors that may

be present.

Using Academic/APA

format proficiently. Text is

basically error free.

Total / 50

Overall Score

No Submission 0 points minimum

Emerging (F through D Range) 35 points minimum

Satisfactory (C Range) 40 points minimum

Proficient (B Range) 45 points minimum

Exemplary (A Range) 50 points minimum