BASIC OPERATIONAL CONCEPTS PPT PRESENTATION

Operational Budget Presentation - Rubric

Collapse All

Key Components of Budget Costs

24 points

Criteria Description

Key Components of Budget Costs

5. Excellent

24 points

The presentation includes a thorough description of the cost of staff, activities, services, and supplies.

4. Good

22.08 points

The presentation includes a comprehensive and thorough description of the cost of staff, activities, services, and supplies.

3. Satisfactory

21.12 points

The presentation includes a clear description of the cost of staff, activities, services, and supplies.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

19.2 points

The presentation does not include a complete description of the cost of staff, activities, services, and supplies.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The presentation does not sufficiently describe the cost of staff, activities, services, and supplies.

Relevant Capital Purchase

24 points

Criteria Description

Relevant Capital Purchase

5. Excellent

24 points

The presentation clearly and accurately identifies a well-researched, relevant capital purchase that the unit may require, including the need, the return on investment, and benefits.

4. Good

22.08 points

The presentation skillfully identifies a well-researched, relevant capital purchase that the unit may require, including the need, the return on investment, and benefits.

3. Satisfactory

21.12 points

The presentation identifies a relevant capital purchase that the unit may require, including the need, the return on investment, and benefits.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

19.2 points

The presentation does not clearly identify a relevant capital purchase that the unit may require, including the need, the return on investment, and benefits.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The presentation does not sufficiently identify a relevant capital purchase that the unit may require, including the need, the return on investment, and benefits.

Presentation of Content

8 points

Criteria Description

Presentation of Content

5. Excellent

8 points

The content is written with a logical progression of ideas and supporting information exhibiting a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Includes persuasive information from reliable sources.

4. Good

7.36 points

The content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally progress and relate to each other. The project includes motivating questions and advanced organizers. The project gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea.

3. Satisfactory

7.04 points

The presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization or in their relationships to each other.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

6.4 points

The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong sense of purpose. Includes some persuasive information.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The content lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence of information. Includes little persuasive information. Sequencing of ideas is unclear.

Layout

8 points

Criteria Description

Layout

5. Excellent

8 points

The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text.

4. Good

7.36 points

The layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text.

3. Satisfactory

7.04 points

The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

6.4 points

The layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident.

Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.)

8 points

Criteria Description

Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.)

5. Excellent

8 points

The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope.

4. Good

7.36 points

The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly.

3. Satisfactory

7.04 points

Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

6.4 points

Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use of primer prose indicates writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately.

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

4 points

Criteria Description

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

5. Excellent

4 points

Writer is clearly in control of standard, written, academic English.

4. Good

3.68 points

Slides are largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present.

3. Satisfactory

3.52 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

3.2 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Slide errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning.

Documentation of Sources

4 points

Criteria Description

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

5. Excellent

4 points

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

4. Good

3.68 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

3. Satisfactory

3.52 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

3.2 points

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Sources are not documented.

Total 80 points