ldrs 302
Ada Yu
Week1PowerPointPresentation.pdf
HISTORICAL CONCEPTS & THEORIES OF LEADERSHIP
LDRS 302 I5 (SP21)
HISTORICAL CONCEPTS & THEORIES OF LEADERSHIP LDRS 302 I5 (SP21)
INSTRUCTOR: Monte Tugwete
E-MAIL: [email protected]
PHONE: 604-616-1374
• Welcome
• Introductions • Syllabus
• Description • Objectives
• Readings • Outline
• Forums • Grading
• Questions
HISTORICAL CONCEPTS & THEORIES OF LEADERSHIP LDRS 302 I5 (SP21)
• Through this course, learners will: • Understand leadership and management terminologies; • Be conversant with ancient, classical and neo-classical theories
of leadership & management; • Interpret leadership and management trends; • Interpret behaviors and perspectives of colleagues and
organizations; • Develop meaningful applications of theories in leadership and
management that are appropriate to a variety of organizational settings.
HISTORICAL CONCEPTS & THEORIES OF LEADERSHIP TEXTS
REQUIRED TEXTS & MATERIALS FOR THIS COURSE •Northouse, P. G., (2019). Leadership: Theory and Practice (7th Edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. ISBN 9781506362311 •Taylor, F. W., (2010). The Principles of Scientific Management. New York: Cosimo, Inc. ISBN 9781596058897 •Online articles accessible within Moodle.
Historical Concepts & Theories of Leadership
“Grading is important in technical and functional areas, but the distinctiveness and vitality of business
education require that a grading culture be downplayed. Students are there to contribute to and
benefit from a rich learning environment; they are there to be empowered rather than ranked.”
Ø Harvard Business Review July – August 2010
Developing Administrative Competence
HISTORICAL CONCEPTS & THEORIES OF LEADERSHIP LDRS 302 I5
(SP21)
Evaluations: The final grade will be determined by the successful
completion of each of these components:
In class dialogue/participation and professionalism 8%
Attendance 12%
Online dialogue (Forums) 15%
Influencer Individual Presentation #1 5%
Scientific Management Paper #2 10%
Neoclassical (Historical) Leader Paper** #3 15%
Team Presentation** #4 15%
Leadership Case Studies #5 20%
TOTAL 100%
IN CLASS & ONLINE DIALOGUE Guidelines For Effective Cross-Cultural Dialogue & Existence
Source William “Bill” Kondrath’s “Guidelines for Recognising and Valuing Differences”
1. “Try On” – Try and understand others’ background and cultural context and would try on their tastes before discarding them OR introducing yours. If you find that you do not like them then you can always take them off like what you do in the shop when trying on shoes or clothes.
2. “It’s ok to disagree” – Makes it easier not to have malice as it is ok to agree and to disagree and also to say “ouch!” if your callous toe has been stepped on.
3. “Practice self-focus” – Pay attention to personal feelings and personal comfort, also use the word “I” to describe your personal experiences and be aware that these may not be everyone else’s experiences. Also be aware that your “social location” is not every one’s “social location.”
4. “It’s not okay to blame, shame, or attack self or others” – depends on whether you come from a “shame or guilt culture” and this should be straightforward in how this can be effectively used to shut out an idea or get an idea muscled through.
5. “Practice both/and thinking” – Accept that someone’s idea, can run concurrently with another and both can be true. 6. “Notice both process and content” – Process tends to be the “what” and content the “how and why.” 7. “Beware of Intent and Impact” – I have seen that even the best of us at times partake in well intentioned acts, yet the
desired impact read outcome is way off the mark, if not completely the opposite. The story of the monkey taking a salmon out of the water, because the monkey thought that the salmon was wrong in swimming against the tide comes to mind. The monkey had also narrowly survived drowning in those waters, and thought it was doing the salmon a great big favor.
8. “Confidentiality” – Sensitive information that is shared here is shared in confidence and please do not go and share it outside without the contributor’s express approval.
HISTORICAL CONCEPTS & THEORIES OF LEADERSHIP
BREAKOUT ROOMS DISCUSSIONS
• Active participation in experiential activities, group reflection, and critical discourse is an essential component of this course.
• Show respect for all members of the class, both in your speech and manner that expands the group’s perspectives.
• Play a part in the shared coordination of the group’s dialogue process.
• Act as a facilitator, maintaining the flow and quality of the discussion, whenever it’s needed.
• Help redirect, or refocus, discussion when it becomes sidetracked or unproductive.
• Make the effort to engage reluctant participants. • And provide helpful feedback and support to others.
ONLINE FORUM AND RESPONSES 15% • Online forum responses are a conversational form of writing that encourages you to think about your own thinking in relation to other people’s thinking. Each post should be minimum 400 and maximum 750 words. • And your 2 responses to any of your classmates should be minimum 200 and maximum 350 words.
What is the best way to do this? • Easy! Post your response in word. You can see the word count as well as any errors in your work. Here is an egsampe of errers. Words highlight with a red underline. Right click the word and correct it. This goes for your written work as well. • Then you can copy your text and paste it into your forum. Please do not post it as an attachment, I have set Moodle so that it will not allow you to do that. • Also, double check that you have the right references for all your citations. Include references at the bottom of your post as you will get marks for this.
• Use one – two sources and credit them using APA
ONLINE FORUM AND RESPONSES 15% Three steps.
1. You are required to post a reflection to a given prompt before the next class. End your post with an open-ended question, there are marks for this.
2. Then, you will have a few days to reflect on your classmates’ answers and respond to TWO of them before the next class.
3. Finally, you will once again respond to YOUR initial post answering any questions posed of you as well as re-posting your response and changing anything that you may have learned in the consequent weeks.
HISTORICAL CONCEPTS & THEORIES OF LEADERSHIP
ONLINE FORUM AND RESPONSES 15% Online Forum Responses • Online forum responses are a conversational form of writing that encourages you to think about your own thinking in relation to other people’s thinking. • You are required to post a reflection to a given prompt, and then, make a minimum of two written reply posts to others’ reflections and/or replies. • Remember the prompt can be as controversial as controversial can be, and do not waste your word count fighting that, use your word count to show your academic argumentation, the controversy is given to spark the discussion and to give you room to show your own side of critical academic thinking. • All discussions are linked to historical concepts and theories of leadership, if you find yourself without even having to mention the word leadership in your response then something is very wrong, or you have missed the point of the discussion prompter. • Remember our guidelines for cross-cultural dialogue in your engagement with others in these discussions. In addition, you should also insure that:
FORUM EXAMPLE
• The original posting is of high quality, showing depth of knowledge on the topic. Replies occur under two or more different threads, other than that belonging to the student. Replies are posted on more than one day during the posting period.
HISTORICAL CONCEPTS & THEORIES OF LEADERSHIP ONLINE FORUM AND RESPONSES 15%
• Response posts to peers' original postings are respectful, show clear synthesis and evaluation of the content read, and provides depth, breath, or new insight to the topic. A relevant “critical thinking” question is asked to advance the discussion.
• References are included from scholarly peer-reviewed non-course text or readings to support what is said in both the assignment post and to responsive posts to peers. All posts are clearly written and contain no APA/spelling/grammatical errors.
1. Providing and developing a new thought, idea, or perspective.
HISTORICAL CONCEPTS & THEORIES OF LEADERSHIP ONLINE FORUM AND RESPONSES 15%
Substantive participation may include (among other things):
2. Citing an experience or example of what we are learning and showing how it applies.
5. Questioning or challenging a principle/perspective and giving reasons for your questioning and/or providing your viewpoint as well.
3. Adding a new twist on a perspective.
4. Critically reflecting on an idea/concept.
HISTORICAL CONCEPTS & THEORIES OF LEADERSHIP ONLINE FORUM AND RESPONSES 15%
Examples of how to stimulate your own and others’ thinking:
• What would happen if... • Other times it may be helpful to... • It is my understanding... • What is your experience with this? • You might approach this from... • Is it possible that... • Would you consider... • Maybe... • Possibly... • Sometimes... • I'm wondering if... • Do you think... • Perhaps...
1. Very basic comments such as “I agree” or “I disagree.”
HISTORICAL CONCEPTS & THEORIES OF LEADERSHIP ONLINE FORUM AND RESPONSES 15% What Substantive Participation is NOT:
2. Restating what has been said (unless there is a direct purpose in doing so).
3. Disrespectfully disagreeing.
4. Part answers that are not thought-provoking.
HISTORICAL CONCEPTS & THEORIES OF LEADERSHIP WRITTEN ASSIGNMENTS 65%
• Written assignments (APA 7 format. i.e., Times New Roman 12 pt. font, double-spaced) need to be submitted by the due-date as a Word document in the online course ‘drop-box’ for grading and feedback.
• ***When facing technical difficulties, the student may submit the written assignment by the due-date by sending it as an email attachment to:
and this should never be a substitute for circumventing not being on time with one’s submission. Any assignment received via my e-mail after the deadline will be subject to TWU late assignment submission policy.
HISTORICAL CONCEPTS & THEORIES OF LEADERSHIP Individual Assignment #1 Due 29 January, 2021 5%
From the ancient and early influencers lecture, choose a leader and prepare a 5-minute talk outlining what they were known for.
This is an individual assignment.
Please turn in a copy of your notes in Moodle prior to presenting. Notes can be in point form or formal.
The notes do not have to be APA format.
HISTORICAL CONCEPTS & THEORIES OF LEADERSHIP Individual Assignment #2 Due 12 February, 2021 10%
Write a 2-page response (APA 7, double-space) to scientific management.
Be sure to answer the following questions:
1. In your own words, what is scientific management? ½ page 2. How has scientific management influenced leadership and management today? 1 page 3. How will you apply scientific management to your own leadership? Conclusion ½ page
Please cite page numbers if you are using quotes (remember that I want to see your understanding of the quote, not just the quote – use quotes minimally. Suggestion: one quotation per page. Submit via Moodle assignment Dropbox. Label paper like this: [YOUR LAST NAME, FIRST NAME] – A1_Scientific Management.
•This assignment to be submitted in Moodle Dropbox before 11:59 p.m. 12 February 2021
HISTORICAL CONCEPTS & THEORIES OF LEADERSHIP Individual Assignment #3 Due 12 March, 2021 15%
Neoclassical Leader Paper Write a 4-page response (APA 7, double-space) summarizing what you have researched from ONE of the identified leaders about their leadership and why these points are important to you personally. Use any one of the following neoclassical leaders:
• Robert Greenleaf, • Margaret Wheatley, • William Deming, • Peter Drucker, • Henry Mintzberg, • Frederick Herzberg, • Chester Bernard, • Mary Follet, • Abraham Maslow.
N.B. All these leaders will be discussed in class so that you have an idea of who they are and what they did. You will, however, have go in depth on them in your paper. This assignment is to be submitted in Moodle Dropbox before 11:59 p.m. March 12, 2021
HISTORICAL CONCEPTS & THEORIES OF LEADERSHIP Team Assignment, Assignment #4 Due 16 April, 2021 15%
•Prepare and deliver a presentation on a leadership person assigned for your group (that is not covered in “assignment 2”) to help you work well together as a team. Outline what leadership theory that person uses and how that theory relates to organizations or individuals of today. •Please note PowerPoint or speaking notes are a MUST for your presentation and a copy must be put into the Group Presentations dropbox. •Here are some suggestions: Only ONE leader per group, I don't want 7 presentations on the same person on the last day of class. •Please email a copy of your notes or ensure they are attached to the ppt.
HISTORICAL CONCEPTS & THEORIES OF LEADERSHIP Team Assignment, Assignment #4 Due 16 April, 2021 15%
This assignment has the same requirement as your individual Neoclassical (Historical) leader paper. •20% - Introduction to the leader including their background. Explain their theory in your words. •60% - What was the leader known for? What was their inspiration? What did they do that was different? How did their research/theory effect leadership today? Can you give examples of their theory in use today? •10% - Conclusion – Does this theory make sense in today’s world? How will you use this leadership style to your benefit? •10% References - Read over your presentation. Does it make sense? Where did you get your work from?
HISTORICAL CONCEPTS & THEORIES OF LEADERSHIP Team Assignment, Assignment #4 Due 16 April, 2021 15%
Group 1: Ding Jiaqi, Du Peizhou, Gao Xiaodi, Guo Yanjun, Jiang Zilong
Group 2: Li Chi, Li Ziyao, Liao Xuan, Liao Yilin, Liu Zhichao
Group 3: Ma Yuan, Sun Cancan, Sun Weijun, Sun Xufan, Tai Fanmingli
Group 4: Wang Jingjing, Wang Ruiqing, Wu Yi, Wu Yuanyuan, Xiao Zixing
Group 5: Xing Yu, Yan Xu, Zeng Bolin, Zhang Chi, Zhang Jingyi
Group 6: Zhang Wencheng, Zhang ZheHao, Zhang Zihao, Zhao Pengyu, Zhou Ziting
HISTORICAL CONCEPTS & THEORIES OF LEADERSHIP Team Assignment, Assignment #4 Due 16 April, 2021 15%
1 Group 1 Martin Luther King
2 Winston Churchill
3 Group 2 Deng Xiaoping
4 Group 5 Wu Zetian
5 Group 4 Abraham Lincoln
6 Group 3 Mao Zedong
7 Group 5 Sun Yat-sen
HISTORICAL CONCEPTS & THEORIES OF LEADERSHIP Individual Assignment #5 Due 16 April, 2021 20%
Leadership Case Studies At the end of each chapter (except for the introduction) in the Northouse (2019) book, you will read all three case studies. The instructor will choose ONE of the case studies from EACH assigned chapter for you to answer the questions from it. Number your responses to each question as you answer the question. Your response to each Case Study should be no more than one page double-spaced (that means, six case studies = 6 pages total). I am looking for an in depth analysis of the questions using concepts learnt. Label each Case Study (i.e. 2.2) and submit all six Case Studies in ONE paper at the end of the last week of the course. Label the computer file with your last name first, i.e. “Smith - Case Studies.” Be sure to include a cover page following the APA guidelines and submit it in the dropbox.
HISTORICAL CONCEPTS & THEORIES OF LEADERSHIP Written Assignments What Not To Do 65%
EXAMPLE: Assignment 2: Scientific Management Paper - 15% [YOUR LAST NAME, FIRST NAME and English name] – A2_Scientific Management.
Tugwete, Montegomery_A2_Scientific Management This assignment is to be submitted in Moodle Dropbox
Please note the above!!!!
Every semester we get papers like this:
Assign 1 Doc.1 302 paper Scientificmanagement.doc
Or some other variation of this…
HISTORICAL CONCEPTS & THEORIES OF LEADERSHIP Written Assignment 65%
Plagiarism Plagiarism has become a huge issue in this class. If you do not know what this means my suggestion is that every time you submit work with words that are not originally yours or you previously submitted for another class without acknowledging the source, then you have plagiarized. I will only allow up to 7% on the familiarity response, anything above that I will be giving a zero for that submission.
Historical Concepts and Theories of Leadership
Assignment 2
(Your full name and English name) Trinity Western University
Scientific Management Paper LDRS 302 I5
February 16, 2021
Dates to remember:
29 January – Influencer presentation 5%
12 February – Scientific Management Paper 10%
12 March – Neoclassical Leader Paper 15%
16 April – Group Presentations 15%
16 April - Leadership Case Studies 20%
Hmmmm??? Why does my mark differ from what Moodle says?
Moodle is a platform where we get information, submit assignments, get them grade with comments. It does not factor in:
• Attendance • Participation
You can control your final mark by making sure you are on time to Zoom class, keep your camera on ALL the time, participate in class discussions when prompted or you need clarification on a concept or have an aha moment, and you post on the forums. 35% of your mark comes from these areas. (See slide 8)
HISTORICAL CONCEPTS & THEORIES OF LEADERSHIP
THE ACTUAL
SYLLABUS
15 minutes
HISTORICAL CONCEPTS & THEORIES OF LEADERSHIP This Week & Preps for Next Week
Discussion Forum “Leadership is all about influence nothing much, nothing less. Do you agree? Discuss.” Remember: Initial post is due by midnight Sunday and your two responses to your fellow classmates’ post is due by Wednesday midnight.
Reading for Next Class The Rise & Fall of the Roman Empire Video Link: https://youtu.be/M04pFl01iF8
Assignment Due Today Self Introduction is due by 11:59pm today if you haven’t done that already.
