BUS4101 WEEK 1

SUO Discussion Rubric (80 Points) - Version 1.2 Course: BUS4101-Quality Management SU01

Response No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F-D: 1- 27) 27 points

Satisfactory (C: 28- 31) 31 points

Proficient (B: 32- 35) 35 points

Exemplary (A: 36- 40) 40 points

Criterion Score

Quality of

Initial Posting

/ 40No initial posting

exists to evaluate.

The information

provided is

inaccurate, not

focused on the

assignment’s topic,

and/or does not

answer the

question(s) fully.

Response

demonstrates

incomplete

understanding of the

topic and/or

inadequate

preparation.

The information

provided is accurate,

giving a basic

understanding of the

topic(s) covered. A

basic understanding

is when you are able

to describe the

terms and concepts

covered. Despite

this basic

understanding,

initial posting may

not include

complete

development of all

aspects of the

assignment.

The information

provided is accurate,

displaying a good

understanding of the

topic(s) covered. A

good understanding

is when you are able

to explain the terms

and topics covered.

Initial posting

demonstrates

sincere reflection

and addresses most

aspects of the

assignment,

although all

concepts may not be

fully developed.

The information

provided is accurate,

providing an in-

depth, well thought-

out understanding

of the topic(s)

covered. An in-

depth understanding

provides an analysis

of the information,

synthesizing what is

learned from the

course/assigned

readings.

Participation No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F-D: 1- 13) 13 points

Satisfactory (C: 14- 16) 16 points

Proficient (B: 17- 18) 18 points

Exemplary (A: 19- 20) 20 points

Criterion ScoreParticipation No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F-D: 1- 13) 13 points

Satisfactory (C: 14- 16) 16 points

Proficient (B: 17- 18) 18 points

Exemplary (A: 19- 20) 20 points

Criterion Score

Participation in

Discussion

/ 20No responses to

other classmates

were posted in this

discussion forum.

May include one or

more of the

following:

*Comments to only

one other student's

post.

*Comments are not

substantive, such as

just one line or

saying, “Good job”

or “I agree.

*Comments are off

topic.

Comments to two or

more classmates’

initial posts but only

on one day of the

week. Comments

are substantive,

meaning they reflect

and expand on what

the other student

wrote.

Comments to two or

more classmates’

initial posts on more

than one day.

Comments are

substantive,

meaning they reflect

and expand on what

the other student

wrote.

Comments to two or

more classmates’

initial posts and to

the instructor's

comment (if

applicable) on two

or more days.

Responses

demonstrate an

analysis of peers’

comments, building

on previous posts.

Comments extend

and deepen

meaningful

conversation and

may include a

follow-up question.

Writing No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F-D: 1- 13) 13 points

Satisfaction (C: 14- 16) 16 points

Proficient (B: 17- 18) 18 points

Exemplary (A: 19- 20) 20 points

Criterion Score

Writing

Mechanics

(Spelling,

Grammar,

/ 20No postings for

which to evaluate

language and

grammar exist.

Numerous issues in

any of the following:

grammar, mechanics,

spelling, use of

Some spelling,

grammatical, and/or

structural errors are

present. Some errors

Minor errors in

grammar, mechanics,

or spelling in the

initial posting are

Minor to no errors

exist in grammar,

mechanics, or

spelling in both the

Writing No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F-D: 1- 13) 13 points

Satisfaction (C: 14- 16) 16 points

Proficient (B: 17- 18) 18 points

Exemplary (A: 19- 20) 20 points

Criterion Score

Citation Style)

and

Information

Literacy

slang, and

incomplete or

missing citations and

references. If

required for the

assignment, did not

use course, text,

and/or outside

readings (where

relevant) to support

work.

in formatting

citations and

references are

present. If required

for the assignment,

utilizes sources to

support work for

initial post but not

comments to other

students. Sources

include course/text

readings but outside

sources (when

relevant) include

non-

academic/authoritati

ve, such as Wikis

and .com resources.

present. Minor

errors in formatting

citations and

references may

exist. If required for

the assignment,

utilizes sources to

support work for

both the initial post

and some of the

comments to other

students. Sources

include course and

text readings as well

as outside sources

(when relevant) that

are academic and

authoritative (e.g.,

journal articles,

other text books,

.gov Web sites,

professional

organization Web

sites, cases, statutes,

or administrative

rules).

initial post and

comments to others.

Formatting of

citations and

references is correct.

If required for the

assignment, utilizes

sources to support

work for both the

initial post and the

comments to other

students. Sources

include course and

text readings as well

as outside sources

(when relevant) that

are academic and

authoritative (e.g.,

journal articles,

other text books,

.gov Web sites,

professional

organization Web

sites, cases, statutes,

or administrative

rules).

Total / 80

Overall Score

No Submission 0 points

minimum

There was no

submission for

this assignment.

Emerging (F to D Range) 1 point minimum

Satisfactory progress has not

been met on the competencies

for this assignment.

Satisfactory (C Range) 56 points minimum

Satisfactory progress has been

achieved on the competencies

for this assignment.

Proficient (B Range) 64 points minimum

Proficiency has been

achieved on the

competencies for this

assignment.

Exemplary (A

Range) 72 points minimum

The competencies for

this assignment have

been mastered.