Critical Appraisal for Article power point
pachuco35
Week14rubricMSN5300.dotx
School of Nursing FNP
MSN5300 Advanced Nursing Inquiry
and Evidence-Based Practice
Purpose
· The purpose of this assignment is to create a presentation on critical appraisal of quantitative research article to evaluate its trustworthiness and its value to nursing.
Course Outcomes
· Apply the research process to improve evidence based clinical practice and contribute to knowledge development.
· Explain to a variety of audiences the evidence based for practice decisions, including the credibility of sources of information and the relevance to the practice problem confronted.
Program Learning Outcomes
· Integrate nursing and related sciences into the delivery of care to clients across diverse healthcare settings.
· Relate information and communication technologies to document and improve health outcomes.
· Employ collaborative interprofessional strategies for improving client and population health outcomes.
· Relate knowledge of illness and disease management to providing evidence-based care to clients, communities, and vulnerable populations in an evolving healthcare delivery system.
Due Date: Submit to the Moodle by Saturday of the end Week 14 at 11:59 p.m. ET.
Points: This assignment is worth a total of 100 points.
Requirements
· To complete this assignment, you will need to access the Miami Regional University virtual library database: CINAHL Complete Database, MEDLINE Complete Database, LIRN, and so forth. Our Librarian is available to help on campus from Monday to Friday 7:30 am to 9:00 pm & Saturday 8:00 am to 3:00 pm. Remember we now also have a Ask a Librarian option 7 days a week available in Moodle.
· This assignment is worth 100 points and will be graded on the required components as summarized in the directions and grading criteria/rubric. This assignment will be graded on quality of information, use of citations, use of Standard English grammar, sentence structure, and overall organization based on the required components as summarized in the directions and grading criteria and rubric.
· APA format and effective writing is required for this assignment.
· Create your presentation using the version of Microsoft PowerPoint. You can tell that the document is saved as a MS PowerPoint document because it will end in” pptx”.
· Follow the directions and grading criteria closely. Any questions about this presentation may be posted under the Q & A Forum.
· The length of the project report is to be no greater than 20 slides, excluding the title and reference slide.
· This presentation will be submitted through Turnitin, a Turnitin similarity score of 20% or less is expected.
· A minimum of 6 current scholarly references that are 5 years old or less.
· The textbook required for this course may be used as a reference for this assignment but does not count towards the required minimum number of scholarly references.
Directions and Grading Criteria
School of Nursing FNP
MSN5300 Advanced Nursing Inquiry
and Evidence-Based Practice
|
MSN5300-week #14. Dr. Maureen James, Dr. Dionne, & Dr. Perez |
1 |
|
CATEGORY |
Exceed in Meeting the Criteria |
Meet Criteria |
Partially Meet Criteria |
Does Not Meet Criteria |
Points |
|
Content (40 points) |
Demonstrates full knowledge of the critique process. Provides clear explanations of all critique elements; supports conclusions/ideas with evidence from the study. Provides both positive and negative critique. 40 points |
Demonstrates good understanding of the critique process. Provides explanations of majority of critique elements; partially supports conclusions/ideas with evidence from the study. Provides some negative critique mixed with positive narrative. 30 points |
Demonstrates limited understanding of the critique process. Provides explanations of some of critique elements; limited support of conclusions/ideas with evidence from the study. Provides mostly positive narrative. 20 points |
Demonstrates little to no understanding of the critique process. Does not provide explanations of critique elements; does not support conclusions/ideas with evidence from the study. Provides only positive narrative. 10 points |
|
|
Organization (10 points) |
Information is well-organized. Presentation flows nicely. 10 points |
Information is organized. Presentation flows fairly well. 8 points |
Information is fairly organized. Presentation does not flow well. 6 points |
Information appears to be disorganized. Presentation is difficult to understand. 4 points |
|
|
Critical Analysis (20 points) |
Analyses and conclusions are accurate, detailed, insightful, valid, and consistent with data. 20 points |
Analyses and conclusions are consistent with data.
15 points |
Analyses and conclusions are mostly correct.
10 points |
Analyses and conclusions are unclear or inaccurate.
5 points |
|
|
Preparedness (15 points) |
Completely prepared and has obviously rehearsed. 15 points |
Well- prepared and rehearsed. 10 points |
Somewhat prepared but it is clear that rehearsal was lacking. 8 points |
Does not seem at all prepared to present. 5 points |
|
|
Timing (5 points) |
Presentation is 18-20 minutes long. 5 points |
Presentation is 15- 17 minutes long. 4 points |
Presentation is 12- 14 minutes long. 3 points |
Presentation is less than 12 minutes or greater than 20 minutes. 1 point |
|
|
Multimedia (5 points) |
Multimedia element is clear. Sound is easy to hear/understand and/or video can be seen and/ or heard. 5 points |
Multimedia element is somewhat clear. Sound is easy to hear/understand and/or video can be seen and/ or heard. 4 points |
Multimedia element is mostly unclear. Sound is not easy to hear /understand and/or video cannot be seen and/or heard. 3 points |
Multimedia element is unclear. Sound is not easy to hear /understand and/or video cannot be seen and/or heard. 1 point |
|
|
Group Member Participation (5 points) |
Consistently participated in development of the project. 5 points |
Frequently participated in development of the project. 4 points |
Sometimes participated in development of the project. 3 points |
Never participated in development of the project. 0 point |
|
|
APA format Use of a minimum of six current scholarly references. Clarity of writing (0 point)
|
APA format is correct with no more than 1–2 minor errors
Use of a minimum of six current scholarly references.
|
Three to five errors in APA format and/or 1–2 citations missing.
Use of a minimum of three to five current scholarly references.
|
Five to six errors in APA format and/or 3–4 citations missing.
Use of a minimum of three to five current scholarly references.
|
APA formatting contains multiple errors and/or several citations missing Use none to two scholarly references; or use of outdated scholarly references.
|
|
MSN5300-week #14. Dr. Maureen James, Dr. Dionne, & Dr. Perez
