Information Assurance Compliance with Government Regulations
|
Points: 200 |
Project Deliverable 6: Information Assurance Compliance with Government Regulations |
|||
|
Criteria |
Unacceptable Below 70% F |
Fair 70-79% C |
Proficient 80-89% B |
Exemplary 90-100% A |
|
1. Discuss which employees and organizations have a deeper-level of information assurance (IA) policy compliance. Weight: 10% |
Did not submit or incompletely discussed which employees and organizations have a deeper-level of information assurance (IA) policy compliance. |
Partially discussedwhich employees and organizations have a deeper-level of information assurance (IA) policy compliance. |
Satisfactorily discussed which employees and organizations have a deeper-level of information assurance (IA) policy compliance. |
Thoroughly discussed which employees and organizations have a deeper-level of information assurance (IA) policy compliance. |
|
2. Examine the factors that increased the individual’s level of propensity for compliance. Weight: 15% |
Did not submit or incompletely examined the factors that increased the individual’s level of propensity for compliance. |
Partially examinedthe factors that increased the individual’s level of propensity for compliance. |
Satisfactorily examined the factors that increased the individual’s level of propensity for compliance. |
Thoroughly examined the factors that increased the individual’s level of propensity for compliance. |
|
3. Determine the internal and external factors affecting IA policy compliance. Weight: 15% |
Did not submit or incompletely determined the internal and external factors affecting IA policy compliance. |
Partially determinedthe internal and external factors affecting IA policy compliance. |
Satisfactorily determined the internal and external factors affecting IA policy compliance. |
Thoroughly determined the internal and external factors affecting IA policy compliance. |
|
4. Ascertain which of the organizational requirements poses difficulty in adopting technical features to enhance security policy. Weight: 15% |
Did not submit or incompletely ascertained which of the organizational requirements poses difficulty in adopting technical features to enhance security policy. |
Partially ascertained which of the organizational requirements poses difficulty in adopting technical features to enhance security policy. |
Satisfactorily ascertained which of the organizational requirements poses difficulty in adopting technical features to enhance security policy. |
Thoroughly ascertained which of the organizational requirements poses difficulty in adopting technical features to enhance security policy. |
|
5. Discuss factors related to IA and policy compliance that are affected by government regulations. Weight: 15% |
Did not submit or incompletely discussed factors related to IA and policy compliance that are affected by government regulations. |
Partially discussedfactors related to IA and policy compliance that are affected by government regulations. |
Satisfactorily discussed factors related to IA and policy compliance that are affected by government regulations. |
Thoroughly discussed factors related to IA and policy compliance that are affected by government regulations. |
|
6. Suggest a framework that could be used to address the issues described in the “Five Most Common Cybersecurity Mistakes” article, based on the “Audit Program for Application Systems for Auditing”. Weight: 15% |
Did not submit or incompletely suggested a framework that could be used to address the issues described in the “Five Most Common Cybersecurity Mistakes” article, based on the “Audit Program for Application Systems for Auditing”. |
Partially suggesteda framework that could be used to address the issues described in the “Five Most Common Cybersecurity Mistakes” article, based on the “Audit Program for Application Systems for Auditing”. |
Satisfactorily suggested a framework that could be used to address the issues described in the “Five Most Common Cybersecurity Mistakes” article, based on the “Audit Program for Application Systems for Auditing”. |
Thoroughly suggested a framework that could be used to address the issues described in the “Five Most Common Cybersecurity Mistakes” article, based on the “Audit Program for Application Systems for Auditing”. |
|
7. 3 references Weight: 5% |
No references provided. |
Does not meet the required number of references; some or all references poor quality choices. |
Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices. |
Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices. |
|
8. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements Weight: 10% |
More than 6 errors present |
5-6 errors present |
3-4 errors present |
0-2 errors present |