Sociology question
STATUS
& Expectation States
ORGANIZING
01. EXPECTATION STATES THEORY
Aims to explain how our preconceived notions about
others, based on their identities, are the basis for status hierarchies in
small groups
Why Expectation States Theory Matters
On the group level, we evaluate others’ competence & credibility based on status characteristics (socially significant characteristics, rewards, & behavioral interchange patterns), which form the basis for status hierarchies
● These trends perpetuate themselves over time, resulting in certain types of individuals having more influence & power over others
● Status hierarchies based on perceptions of class, race, gender, age, etc. may be fostered & perpetuated by what happens in small group interactions
STATUS DIFFERENCES Higher status members are more likely to be listened to, received more positively, & exert more influence
There may be backlash against those of lower status in positions of authority because their power is perceived as illegitimate
INCONSISTENT CHARACTERISTICS While expectation states
theory does not address the origins of status beliefs, the focus is instead on how these
status beliefs influence people’s attitudes,
perceptions, & behavior
EVERYDAY LIFE
—RALPH WALDO EMERSON
“When the eyes say one thing, and the tongue another, a
practiced man relies on the language of the first.”
”
02.APPLICATION & RESEARCH
Expectation states theory has been subjected to rigorous empirical evaluation, which has generated considerable evidence in support of the theory
STATUS UNEQUAL GROUPS
When peers interact, they look more while listening than while speaking. When
male ROTC officers & cadets interact, officers looked as
much while listening & speaking. Cadets looked
substantially more while listening than while
speaking
Eye Gaze
STATUS UNEQUAL GROUPS
Replicated the previous study on female dyads
differentiated by age & educational attainment
High status females looked while speaking nearly as much as while listening; low status females looked much more while listening
A
When the same high & low status females were placed in subsequent interaction with a new partner who was their equal in status, they reverted to the more usual proportions among peers
B
STATUS UNEQUAL GROUPS
One of the vocal cues most commonly studied in relation to status is the speed with which a person responds to a group task
● One study told female participants whether they were higher or lower than their partners in a task.
○ Subjects assigned high status were more likely to respond before their partners on problem-solving trials
STATUS UNEQUAL GROUPS
Another study examined loudness & speech rates of men & women in same- & mixed-sex groups
● Although there were no effects on speech rates, women spoke louder in a task-oriented discussion with women than with men
○ These results demonstrate that much nonverbal behavior between males & females in task situations reflects the status value of being male or female rather than distinct, sex-role-based behavior
STATUS EQUAL GROUPS
Subjects’ positions in the initial eye-glance hierarchy correlated positively & significantly with the participation rank they later achieved during group discussion
One study measured the eye-glance hierarchies of three-man & three-woman groups
Some researchers suggest that eye contact behaviors reflect perceived status differences
STATUS EQUAL GROUPS
One study argues that group members with a minority
opinion can influence the majority if they actively
present their point of view with consistency &
confidence
In a follow-up, researchers found that a confederate holding a minority opinion was influential when he was seen actively choosing a head seat before interaction, but not when he was assigned that seat
A
This shows that nonverbal behavior & the nature of responses, relative to other group members, leads to attributions of confidence, independence, or competence & increases the influence & status they attain in a group of peers
B
CREDITS: This presentation template was created by Slidesgo, including icons by Flaticon, and infographics & images by Freepik
ALL! THAT’S