Statistics Test
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 2
Lecture Slides
Elementary Statistics Eleventh Edition
and the Triola Statistics Series
by Mario F. Triola
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 3
Chapter 8
Hypothesis Testing
8-1 Review and Preview
8-2 Basics of Hypothesis Testing
8-3 Testing a Claim about a Proportion
8-4 Testing a Claim About a Mean: σ Known
8-5 Testing a Claim About a Mean: σ Not Known
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 4
Section 8-1
Review and Preview
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 5
Review In Chapters 2 and 3 we used “descriptive statistics” when we summarized data using tools such as graphs, and statistics such as the mean and standard deviation.
Methods of inferential statistics use sample data to make an inference or conclusion about a population. The two main activities of inferential statistics are using sample data to (1) estimate a population parameter (such as estimating a population parameter with a confidence interval), and (2) test a hypothesis or claim about a population parameter.
In Chapter 7 we presented methods for estimating a population parameter with a confidence interval, and in this chapter we present the method of hypothesis testing.
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 6
Definitions
In statistics, a hypothesis is a claim or statement about a property of a population.
A hypothesis test (or test of significance) is a standard procedure for testing a claim about a property of a population.
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 7
Main Objective
The main objective of this chapter is to
develop the ability to conduct hypothesis
tests for claims made about a:
- population proportion p,
- a population mean ,
- or a population standard deviation .
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 8
Examples of Hypotheses that can be Tested
• Genetics: The Genetics & IVF Institute claims that its XSORT method allows couples to increase the probability of having a baby girl.
• Business: A newspaper headline makes the claim that most workers get their jobs through networking.
• Medicine: Medical researchers claim that when people with colds are treated with echinacea, the treatment has no effect.
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 9
Examples of Hypotheses that can be Tested
• Aircraft Safety: The Federal Aviation Administration claims that the mean weight of an airline passenger (including carry-on baggage) is greater than 185 lb, which it was 20 years ago.
• Quality Control: When new equipment is used to manufacture aircraft altimeters, the new altimeters are better because the variation in the errors is reduced so that the readings are more consistent. (In many industries, the quality of goods and services can often be improved by reducing variation.)
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 10
Caution
When conducting hypothesis tests as
described in this chapter and the
following chapters, instead of jumping
directly to procedures and calculations,
be sure to consider the context of the
data, the source of the data, and the
sampling method used to obtain the
sample data.
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 11
Section 8-2
Basics of Hypothesis
Testing
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 12
Key Concept
This section presents individual
components of a hypothesis test. We should
know and understand the following:
• How to identify the null hypothesis and alternative hypothesis from a given claim, and how to express both in symbolic form
• How to calculate the value of the test statistic, given a claim and sample data
• How to identify the critical value(s), given a significance level
• How to identify the P-value, given a value of the test statistic
• How to state the conclusion about a claim in simple and nontechnical terms
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 13
Part 1:
The Basics of Hypothesis Testing
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 14
Rare Event Rule for
Inferential Statistics
If, under a given assumption, the
probability of a particular observed event
is exceptionally small, we conclude that
the assumption is probably not correct.
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 15
Components of a
Formal Hypothesis
Test
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 16
Null Hypothesis:
H0
• The null hypothesis (denoted by H0) is a statement that the value of a population parameter (such as proportion, mean, or standard deviation) is equal to some claimed value.
• We test the null hypothesis directly.
• Either reject H0 or fail to reject H0.
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 17
Alternative Hypothesis:
H1
• The alternative hypothesis (denoted by H1 or Ha or HA) is the statement that the parameter has a value that somehow differs from the null hypothesis.
• The symbolic form of the alternative hypothesis must use one of these symbols: , <, >.
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 18
Note about Forming Your
Own Claims (Hypotheses)
If you are conducting a study and want to use a hypothesis test to support your claim, the claim must be worded so that it becomes the alternative hypothesis.
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 19
Note about Identifying
H0 and H1
Figure 8-2
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 20
Example:
Consider the claim that the mean weight of
airline passengers (including carry-on
baggage) is at most 195 lb (the current value
used by the Federal Aviation Administration).
Follow the three-step procedure outlined in
Figure 8-2 to identify the null hypothesis and
the alternative hypothesis.
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 21
Example:
Step 1: Express the given claim in symbolic
form. The claim that the mean is at
most 195 lb is expressed in symbolic
form as ≤ 195 lb.
Step 2: If ≤ 195 lb is false, then > 195 lb
must be true.
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 22
Example:
Step 3: Of the two symbolic expressions
≤ 195 lb and > 195 lb,
we see that > 195 lb does not contain
equality, so we let the alternative
hypothesis H1 be > 195 lb.
Also, the null hypothesis must be a
statement that the mean equals 195 lb, so
we let H0 be = 195 lb.
Note that the original claim that the mean is at most
195 lb is neither the alternative hypothesis nor the null
hypothesis.
(However, we would be able to address the original claim
upon completion of a hypothesis test.)
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 23
The test statistic is a value used in making
a decision about the null hypothesis, and is
found by converting the sample statistic to
a score with the assumption that the null
hypothesis is true.
Test Statistic
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 24
Test Statistic - Formulas
Test statistic for
proportion
z = p̂ − p
pq
n
Test statistic
for mean z = x −
n
or t = x −
s
n
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 25
Example:
Let’s again consider the claim that the XSORT
method of gender selection increases the
likelihood of having a baby girl.
Preliminary results from a test of the XSORT
method of gender selection involved 14 couples
who gave birth to 13 girls and 1 boy. Use the given
claim and the preliminary results to calculate the
value of the test statistic.
Use the format of the test statistic given above, so
that a normal distribution is used to approximate a
binomial distribution.
(There are other exact methods that do not use the
normal approximation.)
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 26
Example:
The claim that the XSORT method of gender
selection increases the likelihood of having a
baby girl results in the following null and
alternative hypotheses H0: p = 0.5 and
H1: p > 0.5.
We work under the assumption that the null
hypothesis is true with p = 0.5.
The sample proportion of 13 girls in 14 births
results in . Using p = 0.5,
and n = 14,
we find the value of the test statistic as follows:
p̂ = 13 14 = 0.929 p̂ = 0.929
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 27
Example:
We know from previous chapters that a z score of
3.21 is “unusual” (because it is greater than 2).
It appears that in addition to being greater than
0.5, the sample proportion of 13/14 or 0.929 is
significantly greater than 0.5.
The figure on the next slide shows that the sample
proportion of 0.929 does fall within the range of
values considered to be significant because they
are so far above 0.5 that they are not likely to
occur by chance (assuming that the population
proportion is p = 0.5).
z = p̂ − p
pq
n
= 0.929 − 0.5
0.5( ) 0.5( ) 14
= 3.21
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 28
Example:
Sample proportion of: or Test Statistic z = 3.21
p̂ = 0.929
Fail to reject H0 Reject H0
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 29
Critical Region
The critical region (or rejection region) is the
set of all values of the test statistic that
cause us to reject the null hypothesis. For
example, see the red-shaded region in the
previous figure.
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 30
Significance Level
The significance level (denoted by ) is the
probability that the test statistic will fall in the
critical region when the null hypothesis is
actually true. This is the same introduced
in Section 7-2. Common choices for are
0.05, 0.01, and 0.10.
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 31
Critical Value
A critical value is any value that separates the
critical region (where we reject the null
hypothesis) from the values of the test
statistic that do not lead to rejection of the null
hypothesis. The critical values depend on the
nature of the null hypothesis, the sampling
distribution that applies, and the significance
level . See the previous figure where the
critical value of z = 1.645 corresponds to a
significance level of = 0.05.
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 32
P-Value
The P-value (or p-value or probability value)
is the probability of getting a value of the test
statistic that is at least as extreme as the one
representing the sample data, assuming that
the null hypothesis is true.
Critical region
in the left tail:
Critical region
in the right tail:
Critical region
in two tails:
P-value = area to the left of
the test statistic
P-value = area to the right of
the test statistic
P-value = twice the area in the
tail beyond the test statistic
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 33
P-Value
The null hypothesis is rejected if the P-value
is very small, such as 0.05 or less.
Here is a memory tool useful for interpreting
the P-value:
If the P is low, the null must go.
If the P is high, the null will fly.
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 34
Procedure for Finding P-Values
Figure 8-5
H1:>H1:<
H1:≠
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 35
Caution
Don’t confuse a P-value with a proportion p.
Know this distinction:
P-value = probability of getting a test
statistic at least as extreme as
the one representing sample
data
p = population proportion
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 36
Example Consider the claim that with the XSORT method
of gender selection, the likelihood of having a
baby girl is different from p = 0.5, and use the
test statistic z = 3.21 found from 13 girls in 14
births.
First determine whether the given conditions
result in a critical region in the right tail, left tail,
or two tails, then use Figure 8-5 to find the P-
value. Interpret the P-value.
H0: p=0.5
H1: p≠0.5
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 37
Example
The claim that the likelihood of having a baby
girl is different from p = 0.5 can be expressed as
p ≠ 0.5 so the critical region is in two tails.
Using Figure 8-5 to find the P-value for a two-
tailed test, we see that the P-value is twice the
area to the right of the test statistic z = 3.21.
We refer to Table A-2 (or use technology) to find
that the area to the right of z = 3.21 is 0.0007.
In this case, the P-value is twice the area to the
right of the test statistic, so we have:
P-value = 2 0.0007 = 0.0014
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 38
Example
The P-value is 0.0014 (or 0.0013 if greater
precision is used for the calculations). The small
P-value of 0.0014 shows that there is a very
small chance of getting the sample results that
led to a test statistic of z = 3.21. This suggests
that with the XSORT method of gender
selection, the likelihood of having a baby girl is
different from 0.5.
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 39
Types of Hypothesis Tests:
Two-tailed, Left-tailed, Right-tailed
The tails in a distribution are the extreme
regions bounded by critical values.
Determinations of P-values and critical values
are affected by whether a critical region is in
two tails, the left tail, or the right tail. It
therefore becomes important to correctly
characterize a hypothesis test as two-tailed,
left-tailed, or right-tailed.
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 40
Two-tailed Test
H0: =
H1:
is divided equally between the two tails of the critical
region
Means less than or greater than
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 41
Left-tailed Test
H0: =
H1: <
Points Left
the left tail
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 42
Right-tailed Test
H0: =
H1: >
Points Right
the Right tail
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 43
Conclusions
in Hypothesis Testing
We always test the null hypothesis.
The initial conclusion will always be
one of the following:
1. Reject the null hypothesis.
2. Fail to reject the null hypothesis.
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 44
P-value method:
Using the significance level :
If P-value , reject H0.
If P-value > , fail to reject H0.
Decision Criterion
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 45
Traditional method:
If the test statistic falls within the
critical region, reject H0.
If the test statistic does not fall
within the critical region, fail to
reject H0.
Decision Criterion
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 46
Another option:
Instead of using a significance
level such as 0.05, simply identify
the P-value and leave the decision
to the reader.
Decision Criterion
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 47
Decision Criterion
Confidence Intervals:
A confidence interval estimate of a
population parameter contains the
likely values of that parameter.
If a confidence interval does not
include a claimed value of a
population parameter, reject that
claim.
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 48
Wording of Final Conclusion
Figure 8-7
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 49
Caution
Never conclude a hypothesis test with a
statement of “reject the null hypothesis”
or “fail to reject the null hypothesis.”
Always make sense of the conclusion
with a statement that uses simple
nontechnical wording that addresses the
original claim.
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 50
Accept Versus Fail to Reject
• Some texts use “accept the null hypothesis.”
• We are not proving the null hypothesis.
• Fail to reject says more correctly
• The available evidence is not strong enough to warrant rejection of the null hypothesis (such as not enough evidence to convict a suspect).
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 51
Type I Error
• A Type I error is the mistake of
rejecting the null hypothesis when it
is actually true.
• The symbol (alpha) is used to
represent the probability of a type I
error.
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 52
Type II Error
• A Type II error is the mistake of failing
to reject the null hypothesis when it is
actually false.
• The symbol (beta) is used to
represent the probability of a type II
error.
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 53
Type I and Type II Errors
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 54
Example:
a) Identify a type I error.
b) Identify a type II error.
Assume that we are conducting a hypothesis
test of the claim that a method of gender
selection increases the likelihood of a baby
girl, so that the probability of a baby girls is p >
0.5. Here are the null and alternative
hypotheses: H0: p = 0.5, and H1: p > 0.5.
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 55
Example:
a) A type I error is the mistake of rejecting a
true null hypothesis, so this is a type I error:
Conclude that there is sufficient evidence to
support p > 0.5, when in reality p = 0.5.
b) A type II error is the mistake of failing to
reject the null hypothesis when it is false, so
this is a type II error: Fail to reject p = 0.5
(and therefore fail to support p > 0.5) when in
reality p > 0.5.
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 56
Controlling Type I and
Type II Errors
• For any fixed , an increase in the sample size n will cause a decrease in
• For any fixed sample size n, a decrease in will cause an increase in . Conversely, an increase in will cause a decrease in .
• To decrease both and , increase the sample size.
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 57
Comprehensive
Hypothesis Test –
P-Value Method
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 58
Comprehensive
Hypothesis Test –
Traditional Method
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 59
Comprehensive
Hypothesis Test - cont
A confidence interval estimate of a population
parameter contains the likely values of that
parameter. We should therefore reject a claim
that the population parameter has a value that
is not included in the confidence interval.
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 60
In some cases, a conclusion based on a
confidence interval may be different
from a conclusion based on a
hypothesis test. See the comments in
the individual sections.
Caution
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 61
Part 2:
Beyond the Basics of Hypothesis Testing:
The Power of a Test
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 62
Definition
The power of a hypothesis test is the
probability (1 – ) of rejecting a false null
hypothesis. The value of the power is
computed by using a particular significance
level and a particular value of the
population parameter that is an alternative to
the value assumed true in the null hypothesis.
That is, the power of the hypothesis test is the
probability of supporting an alternative
hypothesis that is true.
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 63
Power and the
Design of Experiments
Just as 0.05 is a common choice for a significance
level, a power of at least 0.80 is a common
requirement for determining that a hypothesis test is
effective. (Some statisticians argue that the power
should be higher, such as 0.85 or 0.90.) When
designing an experiment, we might consider how
much of a difference between the claimed value of a
parameter and its true value is an important amount
of difference. When designing an experiment, a goal
of having a power value of at least 0.80 can often be
used to determine the minimum required sample
size.
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 64
Recap
In this section we have discussed:
❖ Null and alternative hypotheses.
❖ Test statistics.
❖ Significance levels.
❖ P-values.
❖ Decision criteria.
❖ Type I and II errors.
❖ Power of a hypothesis test.
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 65
Section 8-3
Testing a Claim About a
Proportion
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 66
Key Concept
This section presents complete procedures
for testing a hypothesis (or claim) made about
a population proportion.
This section uses the components introduced
in the previous section for the P-value
method, the traditional method or the use of
confidence intervals.
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 67
Key Concept
Two common methods for testing a claim
about a population proportion are (1) to use a
normal distribution as an approximation to
the binomial distribution, and (2) to use an
exact method based on the binomial
probability distribution.
Part 1 of this section uses the approximate
method with the normal distribution, and Part
2 of this section briefly describes the exact
method.
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 68
Part 1:
Basic Methods of Testing Claims about a Population Proportion p
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 69
Notation
p = population proportion (used in the
null hypothesis)
q = 1 – p
n = number of trials
p = (sample proportion) x n
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 70
1) The sample observations are a simple random sample.
2) The conditions for a binomial distribution are satisfied.
3) The conditions np 5 and nq 5 are both satisfied, so the binomial distribution of sample proportions can be approximated by a normal distribution with µ = np and = npq . Note: p is the assumed proportion not the sample proportion.
Requirements for Testing Claims
About a Population Proportion p
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 71
p – p
pq n
z =
Test Statistic for Testing
a Claim About a Proportion
P-values:
Critical Values:
Use the standard normal
distribution (Table A-2) and refer to
Figure 8-5
Use the standard normal
distribution (Table A-2).
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 72
Caution
Don’t confuse a P-value with a proportion p.
P-value = probability of getting a test
statistic at least as extreme as
the one representing sample
data
p = population proportion
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 73
P-Value Method:
Use the same method as described
in Section 8-2 and in Figure 8-8.
Use the standard normal
distribution (Table A-2).
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 74
Traditional Method
Use the same method as described
in Section 8-2 and in Figure 8-9.
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 75
Confidence Interval Method
Use the same method as described
in Section 8-2 and in Table 8-2.
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 76
CAUTION When testing claims about a population proportion,
the traditional method and the P-value method are
equivalent and will yield the same result since they
use the same standard deviation based on the claimed
proportion p.
However, the confidence interval uses an estimated
standard deviation based upon the sample proportion p.
Consequently, it is possible that the traditional and P-
value methods may yield a different conclusion than the
confidence interval method.
A good strategy is to use a confidence interval to
estimate a population proportion, but use the P-value
or traditional method for testing a claim about the
proportion.
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 77
Example:
The text refers to a study in which 57 out of
104 pregnant women correctly guessed the
sex of their babies.
Use these sample data to test the claim that
the success rate of such guesses is the 50%
success rate expected with random chance
guesses.
Use a 0.05 significance level.
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 78
Example:
Requirements are satisfied: simple random
sample; fixed number of trials (104) with two
categories (guess correctly or do not); np =
(104)(0.5) = 52 ≥ 5 and nq = (104)(0.5) = 52 ≥ 5
Step 1: original claim is that the success rate
is no different from 50%: p = 0.50
Step 2: opposite of original claim is p ≠ 0.50
Step 3: p ≠ 0.50 does not contain equality so
it is H1.
H0: p = 0.50 null hypothesis and original claim
H1: p ≠ 0.50 alternative hypothesis
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 79
Example:
Step 4: significance level is = 0.05
Step 5: sample involves proportion so the
relevant statistic is the sample
proportion,
Step 6: calculate z:
p̂
z = p̂ − p
pq
n
=
57
104 − 0.50
0.50( ) 0.50( ) 104
= 0.98
two-tailed test, P-value is twice the
area to the right of test statistic
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 80
Example:
Table A-2: z = 0.98 has an area of 0.8365 to its
left, so area to the right is 1 – 0.8365 = 0.1635,
doubles yields 0.3270 (technology provides a
more accurate P-value of 0.3268
Step 7: the P-value of 0.3270 is greater than
the significance level of 0.05, so fail to
reject the null hypothesis
Here is the correct conclusion: There is not
sufficient evidence to warrant rejection of the
claim that women who guess the sex of their
babies have a success rate equal to 50%.
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 81
(determining the sample proportion of households with cable TV)
p = = = 0.64 x n
96
(96+54)
and 54 do not” is calculated using
p sometimes must be calculated “96 surveyed households have cable TV
p sometimes is given directly
“10% of the observed sports cars are red” is expressed as
p = 0.10
Obtaining P
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 82
Part 2:
Exact Method for Testing Claims about a Proportion p
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 83
Testing Claims We can get exact results by using the binomial probability distribution.
Binomial probabilities are a nuisance to calculate manually, but technology makes this approach quite simple.
Also, this exact approach does not require that np ≥ 5 and nq ≥ 5 so we have a method that applies when that requirement is not satisfied.
To test hypotheses using the exact binomial distribution, use the binomial probability distribution with the P-value method, use the value of p assumed in the null hypothesis, and find P- values as follows:
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 84
Testing Claims
Left-tailed test:
The P-value is the probability of getting x or fewer successes among n trials.
Right-tailed test:
The P-value is the probability of getting x or more successes among n trials.
p p̂
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 85
Testing Claims
Two-tailed test:
the P-value is twice the probability of getting x or more successes
the P-value is twice the probability of getting x or fewer successes
If p̂ p,
If p̂ p,
p p ^
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 86
Recap
In this section we have discussed:
❖ Test statistics for claims about a proportion.
❖ P-value method.
❖ Confidence interval method.
❖ Obtaining p.
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 87
Section 8-4
Testing a Claim About a
Mean: Known
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 88
Key Concept
This section presents methods for testing a
claim about a population mean, given that the
population standard deviation is a known
value.
This section uses the normal distribution with
the same components of hypothesis tests
that were introduced in Section 8-2.
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 89
Notation
n = sample size
= sample mean
= population mean of all sample means from samples of size n
= known value of the population standard deviation
x
x
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 90
Requirements for Testing Claims About
a Population Mean (with Known)
1) The sample is a simple random sample.
2) The value of the population standard deviation is known.
3) Either or both of these conditions is satisfied: The population is normally distributed or n > 30.
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 91
Test Statistic for Testing a Claim About a Mean (with Known)
n
x – µxz =
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 92
Example: People have died in boat accidents because an
obsolete estimate of the mean weight of men was
used.
Using the weights of the simple random sample of
men, we obtain these sample statistics:
n = 40 and = 172.55 lb.
Research from several other sources suggests
that the population of weights of men has a
standard deviation given by = 26 lb.
Use these results to test the claim that men have a
mean weight greater than 166.3 lb, which was the
weight in the National Transportation and Safety
Board’s recommendation.
Use a 0.05 significance level, and use the P-value
method outlined in Figure 8-8.
x
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 93
Example:
Requirements are satisfied: simple random
sample, is known (26 lb), sample size is 40
(n > 30)
Step 1: Express claim as > 166.3 lb
Step 2: alternative to claim is ≤ 166.3 lb
Step 3: > 166.3 lb does not contain equality,
it is the alternative hypothesis:
H0: = 166.3 lb null hypothesis
H1: > 166.3 lb alternative hypothesis and
original claim
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 94
Example:
Step 4: significance level is = 0.05
Step 5: claim is about the population mean,
so the relevant statistic is the sample
mean (172.55 lb), is known (26 lb),
sample size greater than 30
Step 6: calculate z
z = x −
x
n
= 172.55 − 166.3
26
40
= 1.52
right-tailed test, so P-value is the area
to the right of z = 1.52;
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 95
Example:
Table A-2: area to the left of z = 1.52
is 0.9357, so the area to the right is
1 – 0.9357 = 0.0643.
The P-value is 0.0643
Step 7: The P-value of 0.0643 is greater than
the significance level of = 0.05, we
fail to reject the null hypothesis.
x = 172.55
= 166.3 or
z = 0 or z = 1.52
P-value = 0.0643
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 96
Example:
The P-value of 0.0643 tells us that if men have a
mean weight given by = 166.3 lb, there is a
good chance (0.0643) of getting a sample mean
of 172.55 lb.
A sample mean such as 172.55 lb could easily
occur by chance.
There is not sufficient evidence to support a
conclusion that the population mean is greater
than 166.3 lb, as in the National Transportation
and Safety Board’s recommendation.
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 97
Example:
The traditional method: Use z = 1.645 instead of
finding the P-value. Since z = 1.52 does not fall
in the critical region, again fail to reject the null
hypothesis.
Confidence Interval method: Use a one-tailed
test with = 0.05, so construct a 90%
confidence interval:
165.8 < < 179.3
The confidence interval contains 166.3 lb, we
cannot support a claim that is greater than
166.3. Again, fail to reject the null hypothesis.
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 98
Underlying Rationale of
Hypothesis Testing
If, under a given assumption, there is an
extremely small probability of getting sample
results at least as extreme as the results that
were obtained, we conclude that the
assumption is probably not correct.
When testing a claim, we make an
assumption (null hypothesis) of equality. We
then compare the assumption and the
sample results and we form one of the
following conclusions:
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 99
• If the sample results (or more extreme results)
can easily occur when the assumption (null
hypothesis) is true, we attribute the relatively
small discrepancy between the assumption and
the sample results to chance.
• If the sample results cannot easily occur when
that assumption (null hypothesis) is true, we
explain the relatively large discrepancy between
the assumption and the sample results by
concluding that the assumption is not true, so
we reject the assumption.
Underlying Rationale of
Hypotheses Testing - cont
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 100
Recap
In this section we have discussed:
❖ Requirements for testing claims about
population means, σ known.
❖ P-value method.
❖ Traditional method.
❖ Confidence interval method.
❖ Rationale for hypothesis testing.
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 101
Section 8-5
Testing a Claim About a
Mean: Not Known
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 102
Key Concept
This section presents methods for testing a
claim about a population mean when we do
not know the value of σ.
The methods of this section use the Student t
distribution introduced earlier.
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 103
Notation
n = sample size
= sample mean
= population mean of all sample means from samples of size n
x
x
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 104
Requirements for Testing Claims
About a Population
Mean (with Not Known)
1) The sample is a simple random sample.
2) The value of the population standard deviation is not known.
3) Either or both of these conditions is satisfied: The population is normally distributed or n > 30.
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 105
Test Statistic for Testing a Claim About a Mean (with Not Known)
P-values and Critical Values ❖Found in Table A-3
❖Degrees of freedom (df) = n – 1
x – µxt = s n
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 106
Important Properties of the
Student t Distribution 1. The Student t distribution is different for different
sample sizes (see Figure 7-5 in Section 7-4).
2. The Student t distribution has the same general bell shape as the normal distribution; its wider shape reflects the greater variability that is expected when s is used to estimate .
3. The Student t distribution has a mean of t = 0 (just as the standard normal distribution has a mean of z = 0).
4. The standard deviation of the Student t distribution varies with the sample size and is greater than 1 (unlike the standard normal distribution, which has = 1).
5. As the sample size n gets larger, the Student t distribution gets closer to the standard normal distribution.
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 107
Choosing between the Normal and Student t Distributions when Testing a
Claim about a Population Mean µ
Use the Student t distribution when is
not known and either or both of these
conditions is satisfied:
The population is normally distributed or
n > 30.
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 108
Example: People have died in boat accidents because an
obsolete estimate of the mean weight of men was
used.
Using the weights of the simple random sample
of men from Data Set 1 in Appendix B, we obtain
these sample statistics: n = 40 and = 172.55 lb,
and s= 26.33 lb. Do not assume that the value of
is known.
Use these results to test the claim that men have a
mean weight greater than 166.3 lb, which was the
weight in the National Transportation and Safety
Board’s recommendation M-04-04.
Use a 0.05 significance level, and the traditional
method outlined in Figure 8-9.
x
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 109
Example:
Requirements are satisfied: simple random
sample, population standard deviation is not
known, sample size is 40 (n > 30)
Step 1: Express claim as > 166.3 lb
Step 2: alternative to claim is ≤ 166.3 lb
Step 3: > 166.3 lb does not contain equality,
it is the alternative hypothesis:
H0: = 166.3 lb null hypothesis
H1: > 166.3 lb alternative hypothesis and
original claim
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 110
Example:
Step 4: significance level is = 0.05
Step 5: claim is about the population mean,
so the relevant statistic is the sample
mean, 172.55 lb
Step 6: calculate t
t = x −
x
s
n
= 172.55 − 166.3
26.33
40
= 1.501
df = n – 1 = 39, area of 0.05, one-tail
yields t = 1.685;
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 111
Example:
Step 7: t = 1.501 does not fall in the critical
region bounded by t = 1.685, we fail
to reject the null hypothesis.
= 166.3 or
z = 0 x = 172.55
or t = 1.52
Critical value t = 1.685
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 112
Example:
Because we fail to reject the null hypothesis, we
conclude that there is not sufficient evidence to
support a conclusion that the population mean
is greater than 166.3 lb, as in the National
Transportation and Safety Board’s
recommendation.
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 113
The critical value in the preceding example
was t = 1.782, but if the normal distribution
were being used, the critical value would have
been z = 1.645.
The Student t critical value is larger (farther to
the right), showing that with the Student t
distribution, the sample evidence must be
more extreme before we can consider it to be
significant.
Normal Distribution Versus
Student t Distribution
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 114
P-Value Method
❖ Use software or a TI-83/84 Plus calculator.
❖ If technology is not available, use Table A-3 to identify a range of P-values.
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 115
a) In a left-tailed hypothesis test, the sample size
is n = 12, and the test statistic is t = –2.007.
b) In a right-tailed hypothesis test, the sample size
is n = 12, and the test statistic is t = 1.222.
c) In a two-tailed hypothesis test, the sample size
is n = 12, and the test statistic is t = –3.456.
Example: Assuming that neither software nor a TI-83 Plus calculator is available, use Table A-3 to find a range of values for the P-value corresponding to the given results.
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 116
Example: Assuming that neither software nor a TI-83 Plus calculator is available, use Table A-3 to find a range of values for the P-value corresponding to the given results.
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 117
Example: Assuming that neither software nor a TI-83 Plus calculator is available, use Table A-3 to find a range of values for the P-value corresponding to the given results.
a) The test is a left-tailed test with test
statistic t = –2.007, so the P-value is the
area to the left of –2.007. Because of the
symmetry of the t distribution, that is the
same as the area to the right of +2.007. Any
test statistic between 2.201 and 1.796 has a
right-tailed P-value that is between 0.025
and 0.05. We conclude that
0.025 < P-value < 0.05.
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 118
Example: Assuming that neither software nor a TI-83 Plus calculator is available, use Table A-3 to find a range of values for the P-value corresponding to the given results.
b) The test is a right-tailed test with test
statistic t = 1.222, so the P-value is the
area to the right of 1.222. Any test
statistic less than 1.363 has a right-tailed
P-value that is greater than 0.10. We
conclude that P-value > 0.10.
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 119
c) The test is a two-tailed test with test statistic
t = –3.456. The P-value is twice the area to
the left of –3.456 (= right of +3.456). Any test
statistic greater than 3.106 has a two-
tailed P-value that is less than 0.01. We
conclude that
P-value < 0.01.
Example: Assuming that neither software nor a TI-83 Plus calculator is available, use Table A-3 to find a range of values for the P-value corresponding to the given results.
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8.1 - 120
Recap
In this section we have discussed:
❖ Assumptions for testing claims about
population means, σ unknown.
❖ Student t distribution.
❖ P-value method.