#2 WBS / Project Sequencing Evaluation

profilearqbogs
WBS_ProjectSequencingEvaluationScoringGuide.pdf

1/31/2021 WBS / Project Sequencing Evaluation Scoring Guide

https://courserooma.capella.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/PM-FP/PM-FP4030/180400/Scoring_Guides/u02a1_scoring_guide.html 1/1

WBS / Project Sequencing Evaluation Scoring Guide

CRITERIA NON-PERFORMANCE BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED

Identify the major deliverables of the project.

Does not identify the major deliverables of the project.

Identifies some of the major deliverables of the project.

Identifies the major deliverables of the project.

Identifies the major deliverables of the project in a comprehensive manner.

Develop a work breakdown structure in a logical structure that supports project objectives.

Does not develop a work breakdown structure in a logical structure that supports project objectives.

Develops a work breakdown structure, but not in a logical structure, or one that does not support project objectives.

Develops a work breakdown structure in a logical structure that supports project objectives.

Develops a comprehensive work breakdown structure in a logical structure that supports project objectives.

Provide a detailed description for each type of logical relationship.

Does not provide a description for each type of logical relationship.

Provides an incomplete description for each type of logical relationship.

Provides a detailed description for each type of logical relationship.

Provides a detailed description for each type of logical relationship with supporting references and examples.

Describe the advantages of each type of logical relationship.

Does not list the advantages of each type of logical relationship.

Lists the advantages of each type of logical relationship.

Describes the advantages of each type of logical relationship.

Evaluates the advantages of each type of logical relationship and provides supporting documentation.

Describe the disadvantages of each type of relationship.

Does not list the disadvantages of each type of relationship.

Lists the disadvantages of each type of relationship.

Describes the disadvantages of each type of relationship.

Evaluates the disadvantages of each type of relationship and provides supporting documentation.

Communicate effectively in a professional manner consistent with the standards and conventions of project management.

Does not communicate effectively in a professional manner consistent with the standards and conventions of project management.

Communicates a manner inconsistent with the standards and conventions of project management.

Communicates effectively in a professional manner consistent with the standards and conventions of project management.

Communicates effectively in a professional, scholarly manner consistent with the standards and conventions of project management.