Write one page review

BOOKS

White Doctors, Black Subjects: Abuse Disguised as Research By DENISE GRADY Published: January 23, 2007

The most notorious medical experiment in American history was

surely the Tuskegee syphilis study, in which 400 black men with

syphilis were left untreated for 40 years, from 1932 until 1972, so

government doctors could study the course of the disease. The

experiment ended only because a journalist exposed it, igniting a

firestorm of public outrage over its racism and cruelty. By then, as

many as 100 of the men had already died of syphilis.

Urban Archives/Temple University, via Associated Press

Several government agencies and private companies tested pharmaceuticals on inmates at

Holmesburg prison in Philadelphia from 1951 to 1974.

MEDICAL APARTHEID

The Dark History of Medical Experimentation on Black Americans

From Colonial Times to the Present. By Harriet A. Washington. 501

pages. Doubleday. $27.95

Tuskegee was just part of a pattern of experimental abuse, one of

many shameful chapters in what Harriet A. Washington calls “the

long, unhappy history of medical research with black Americans.”

Ms. Washington, a journalist and research scholar in ethics, writes in

“Medical Apartheid” that this history has left blacks with an ugly

legacy of distrust for research and even treatment, and that it is a

lingering stain on the history of medicine.

She does not oppose medical research or blacks’ inclusion in it. On

the contrary, she calls research “utterly essential,” and blacks’

participation necessary. “African-Americans,” she writes, “desperately

need the medical advantages and revelations that only ethical,

essentially therapeutic research initiatives can give them.”

But first, she argues, the air must be cleared. She is certainly the one

to do it. She has unearthed an enormous amount of shocking

information and shaped it into a riveting, carefully documented book.

Blacks have been forced to undergo painful, risky experimental

surgery, dosed with radiation and singled out for experiments aimed

at finding brain abnormalities linked to violence. They have been

falsely assumed to feel pain less than whites and to require higher X-

ray doses for a readable film.

One of the worst offenders was James Marion Sims, a 19th-century

surgeon who has been venerated as a selfless benefactor of women for

devising ways to repair severe vaginal injuries that can occur in

childbirth.

Sims honed his skills by performing scores of painful operations on

the genitals of black slaves. His early attempts so often failed that he

operated on one young woman 30 times. The women had to be held

down during the excruciating operations. Though ether was available,

Sims refused to use it, insisting it was not needed. But when he had

refined the surgery enough to offer it to white women, he always gave

them ether.

To the question of whether it is fair to judge people like Sims by the

ethical standards of a later era, Ms. Washington replies that he

violated the ethical codes of his own day.

Reprehensible behavior continued into the 20th century. Often, the

so-called research performed on blacks had the trappings of science

but was meaningless, poorly designed and based on specious theories.

People must have known better, but apparently chose not to think

about it.

“In the South,” Ms. Washington writes, “rendering black women

infertile without their knowledge during other surgery was so

common that the procedure was called a ‘Mississippi appendectomy.’

” But the same was true in the North, as recently as the 1970s, when

unnecessary hysterectomies were often done on poor black and

Puerto Rican women to give doctors in training a chance to practice

their skills.

Some of Ms. Washington’s arguments are less convincing than others.

She questions the “significance” of two black men’s being selected as

the first subjects to test the AbioCor artificial heart in 2001 and 2002.

But was it significant?

Since two of the first six subjects were black, she notes that they made

up 33 percent of the test subjects, “almost three times their

representation in the population,” and suggests that blacks were used

disproportionately to test a device that, if ever approved, would

probably be too expensive for most minorities. Ultimately, 14 people

tested the AbioCor, but she never gives the complete racial

breakdown. From her account, it’s hard to figure out what was going

on.

In another venture onto thin ice, Ms. Washington calls for “more

exhaustive studies” of an experimental AIDS vaccine that initially

appeared to protect blacks and Asians, but not whites. But when the

data were closely analyzed, the first finding did not hold up: the

vaccine did not work for anybody. Even so, Ms. Washington implies

that the vaccine did have promise for minorities but was abandoned

purely because it did not help whites. If there is evidence to justify

sinking more money into this vaccine, she does not provide it.

But this is an important book. The disgraceful history it details is a

reminder that people in power have always been capable of exploiting

those they regard as “other,” and of finding ways to rationalize the

most atrocious abuse. The victims are declared defective, violent,

hypersexed or a drain on the community. The medical tinkering is for

their own good, and the greater good of society.

The worst abuses in this country may be a thing of the past, but

history has a way of repeating itself. Ms. Washington warns that

Africa and other poor regions are becoming the next venue for

exploitative studies by foreign governments, universities and drug

companies, which may use their citizens to develop medicines and

other treatments that those nations will never be able to afford.