wac final

1

2

LGBT Adoption Rights Research Paper

Student’s Name

Department/ Faculty

Professor’s Name

Course Code & Name

Date

LGBT Adoption Rights Research Paper

Introduction

LGBT adoption rights have become an increasingly important topic in modern society. With the increase in acceptance of members of the LGBT community, the right for them to adopt children has also increased. This has resulted in various debates surrounding the issue, with positive and negative opinions. In this paper, the topic of LGBT adoption rights will be discussed, focusing on the issue's legal, social, and political aspects. The theories that apply to LGBT adoption will also be explored, including Structural-Functionalism, Conflict Theory, and Symbolic Interactionism. Furthermore, a comparison of opposing views on the issue will be made to provide an in-depth analysis. Through this research, a deeper understanding of the topic is hoped to be drawn.

Thesis Statement

This paper aims to explore the debate around LGBT adoption rights, focusing on the legal, social, political, and theoretical contexts to explore the issue's complexity.

Discussion

Analysis of the Topic

The legalization of LGBT adoption rights is a relatively recent development in the United States, with the first states legalizing such adoptions in the early 2000s (Manning et al., 2014). However, adoption laws vary from state to state, with some states not having any legal restrictions on LGBT adoptions (Farr & Vázquez, 2020). Despite these advances, prejudice, and discrimination are still present in many countries regarding LGBT adoption (Schumm, 2016). Consequently, it is essential to understand the issue's legal, social, and political aspects to gain a greater understanding of the matter.

Legal Context

The legal landscape surrounding LGBT adoption is nuanced and dynamic. Marriage in the United States is illegal for same-sex partners due to the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) of 1996. (Frame, 2019). Since its repeal in 2015, same-sex marriage and adoption have been lawful in all fifty states. (Crossman, 2020). This legal victory for the LGBT rights movement was a significant milestone, providing same-sex couples with access to legal rights such as adoption. However, some states still have laws that specifically deny same-sex couples the right to adopt, and in some cases, these laws are still enforced (Frame, 2019).

Social Context

The social context of LGBT adoption rights is also complex. Even though more people are becoming more accepting of LGBT individuals, there is still much discrimination and prejudice toward same-sex couples and their children (Manning et al., 2014). This is evidenced by the fact that only two-thirds of Americans favor same-sex marriage, indicating that there is still a significant amount of opposition to LGBT rights (Frame, 2019). This can lead to anxiety and fear among LGBT couples and their children as they face potential discrimination or ostracization from certain parts of society.

Political Context

The political context of LGBT adoption rights can be traced back to the 2006 Supreme Court case of R. v. W. v. H. This case marked a significant victory for the LGBT rights movement, as the court ruled in favor of same-sex couples, giving them the same rights to adopt as heterosexual couples (Crossman, 2020). This ruling opened the door to full adoption rights for same-sex couples, allowing them to adopt children in all 50 states legally. Since then, various bills and laws have been passed to protect further LGBT rights, including adopting children (Kazansky, 2020).

Theory Application

Structural-functionalism is a sociological theory that can be applied to LGBT adoption. This theory suggests that all parts of a system must work together in order for the system to function appropriately (Kazansky, 2020). Regarding LGBT adoption, structural-functionalism suggests that all systems, from legal to social, must work together to ensure that same-sex couples have access to the same rights as heterosexual couples. Therefore, in order for LGBT adoption to be successful, laws must be passed to protect the rights of same-sex couples and to ensure that they have access to the same rights as heterosexual couples.

Conflict theory is another sociological theory that can be applied to the issue of LGBT adoption. This theory states that society comprises competing groups with conflicting interests (Kazansky, 2020). In the case of LGBT adoption, there are two competing groups: those who support LGBT rights and those who oppose them. Equal adoption rights for same-sex partners are a key demand of LGBT rights advocates, while those who oppose them argue that homosexuality is immoral and should not be allowed. Consequently, the conflict between these two groups results in a tug-of-war over the issue of LGBT adoption, with both sides fighting for their respective views.

Symbolic interactionism is yet another theory that can be applied to LGBT adoption. According to this theory, symbols, such as words and gestures, play an essential role in shaping our interactions with one another (Carter & Fuller, 2016). Regarding LGBT adoption, the words and gestures used by those involved can either be affirming or hostile. For example, if those involved use words or gestures that affirm the rights of LGBT individuals, then it can help create an environment of acceptance and understanding. On the other hand, if those involved use hurtful words or gestures, it can lead to feelings of fear and anxiety among LGBT couples and their children.

Comparison

The debate surrounding LGBT adoption rights is complex and often driven by emotion. Some vehemently oppose LGBT adoption, arguing that it is immoral and goes against the traditional family structure (Schumm, 2016). They strongly disagree with the concept of same-sex couples raising children and will likely oppose any movement to grant same-sex couples the same legal protections as heterosexual couples. Contrarily, there are those who advocate for LGBT adoption and believe that same-sex couples should have the same rights to adopt as straight couples. (Merskin, 2020). These people are likely to fight for equality for same-sex couples and the best interest of their children. Through this comparison, it becomes clear that the debate over LGBT adoptions is a highly contested issue, with strong opinions on both sides.

Conclusion

In conclusion, LGBT adoption rights are an essential and complex societal issue. From the legal, social, and political contexts explored in this paper, it is evident that there is still a long way to go before LGBT adoption is entirely accepted and embraced in society. It is also clear that various sociological theories, such as Structural-Functionalism, Conflict Theory, and Symbolic Interactionism, can be applied to the issue to gain a greater understanding of the matter. Moreover, a comparison of opposing views has also been made to provide a more comprehensive picture of the debate. Through this research, it is hoped that a better understanding of the topic can be gained and progress can be made in promoting acceptance and understanding of LGBT adoption rights.

References

Carter, M. J., & Fuller, C. (2016). Symbols, meaning, and action: The past, present, and future of Symbolic Interactionism. Current Sociology, 64(6), 931–961. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392116638396

Crossman, A. (2020, January 24). Everything you need to know about functionalist theory. ThoughtCo. Retrieved April 1, 2023, from https://www.thoughtco.com/functionalist-perspective-3026625

Farr, R. H., & Vázquez, C. P. (2020). Stigma experiences, mental health, perceived parenting competence, and parent–child relationships among lesbian, gay, and heterosexual adoptive parents in the United States. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00445

Frame, N. (2019). Intragroup differences of the non-religious: Attitudes toward same-sex marriage and adoption in the United States. Journal of Homosexuality, 68(9), 1509–1524. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2019.1701334

Kazansky, R. (2020). The conflict theory is a pillar of security science. Security Science Journal, 1(2), 32–48. https://doi.org/10.37458/ssj.1.2.3

Manning, W. D., Fettro, M. N., & Lamidi, E. (2014). Child well-being in same-sex parent families: Review of Research Prepared for American Sociological Association Amicus Brief. Population Research and Policy Review, 33(4), 485–502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-014-9329-6

Merskin, D. L. (2020). Functionalist Theory. In The Sage International Encyclopedia of Mass Media and Society (pp. 657–658). essay, Sage.

Schumm, W. R. (2016). A review and critique of research on same-sex parenting and adoption. Psychological Reports, 119(3), 641–760. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294116665594