Reflection Report: Best Practice of BPI case study

Category

Scoring Criteria

Points

Score

Organisation

(15 points)

The type of presentation is appropriate for the topic and audience.

5

3

Information is presented in a logical sequence.

5

4

Presentation appropriately cites requisite number of references.

5

5

Content

(50 points)

Introduction is attention-getting, lays out the problem well, and establishes a framework for the rest of the presentation.

5

4

Technical terms are well-defined in language appropriate for the target audience, eg mapping, processes etc

10

6

Material included is relevant to the case study and reflect to the BPI theories

15

8

Critical analysis included on the selected case study, lesson learnt recorded

15

10

There is an obvious conclusion summarizing the presentation.

5

4

Presentation

(35 points)

Speaker maintains good eye contact with the audience and is appropriately animated (e.g., gestures, moving around, etc.).

5

5

Speaker uses a clear, audible voice. Delivery is poised, controlled, and smooth.

10

7

Good language skills and pronunciation are used.

5

3

Visual aids are well-prepared, informative, effective, and not distracting.

10

6

Length of presentation is within the assigned time limits.

5

3

Total Points

100

67

Feedback and Commentary

Cambridge

Good table contents,

Intro – briefing on the case

Reading the slides a lot and what the case is about

Using Apple to discussion business design implementation Gap?

A certain level of discussion of case,

Some of critical analysis – Personal view added, though not linking to BPM we studied

Slides too wordy

Should use more formal language to present