Criminology, scenario
dblack10
W7DiscussionRubric.pdf
4/30/22, 8:16 AM Rubric Assessment - CCJS 100 7382 Introduction to Criminal Justice (2222) - UMGC Learning Management System
https://learn.umgc.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=631928&evalObjectId=3664125&evalObjectType=5&userId=2… 1/4
CJIF Program Discussion Rubric 11/2020 Course: CCJS 100 7382 Introduction to Criminal Justice (2222)
Criteria Excellent Above Average
Average Below Average
Poor Criterion Score
Content of
original
post/demon
stration of
material
command/in
tegration of
course
materials
and other
readings.
/ 2020 points
Demonstrate
d a clear
understandi
ng of the
weekly
material/sub
ject and
articulated
command of
content/subj
ect into well
stated post
responses;
and/or
displayed
critical
thinking by
bringing in
more than 2
relevant
resources
and by
promoting
significant
further
thought on
the topic.
Points
available: 18
-20
17.9 points
Displayed a
good
understandi
ng of
weekly
material
/subject that
was
presented in
most posts;
and/or
displayed
critical
thinking by
bringing in at
least 2
relevant
resources
promoting
further
thoughts on
the topic.
Points
available: 16
-17.9
15.9 points
Displayed an
understandi
ng of weekly
material/sub
ject but did
not fully
articulate
their
understandi
ng; and/or
displayed
minimal
critical
thinking by
bringing in
only 2
relevant
resources
that
minimally
promoted
further
thoughts on
the topic.
Points
available:
14-15.9
13.9 points
Displayed
very little
understandi
ng of the
weekly
material
/subject and
did not
articulate an
understandi
ng; and/or
did not
demonstrate
critical
thinking as
evidenced
by having 1
or less
relevant
resources
which
minimally
promoted
further
thoughts on
the topic;
and/or
displayed
poor
command of
subject
matter.
11.9 points
Failed to
display any
understandi
ng of the
week's
materials;
and/or
incorrectly
addressed
the weekly
material/sub
ject; and/ or
did not
display
critical
thinking; or
did not bring
in relevant
resources to
support
thoughts; or
did not
promote
further
thoughts on
the topic; or
did not
display
command of
subject
matter.
4/30/22, 8:16 AM Rubric Assessment - CCJS 100 7382 Introduction to Criminal Justice (2222) - UMGC Learning Management System
https://learn.umgc.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=631928&evalObjectId=3664125&evalObjectType=5&userId=2… 2/4
Criteria Excellent Above Average
Average Below Average
Poor Criterion Score
Timeliness
of original
post
/ 5
Points
available:
12-13.9
Points
available F: 0
- 11.9
No post = 0
5 points
Posts
original
discussions
by day two
(2) of the
academic
week.
Points
available:
4.5-5
4.4 points
Posts
original
discussions
by day three
(3) of the
academic
week.
Points
available: 4-
4.4
3.9 points
Posts
original
discussions
by day four
(4) of the
academic
week.
Points
available:
3.5-3.9
3.4 points
Posts
original
discussion
by day five
(5) of the
academic
week.
Points
available: 3-
3.4
2.9 points
Posts
original
discussion
by day six (6)
or seven (7)
of the
academic
week. Points
available
F: 0-2.9
No Post = 0
4/30/22, 8:16 AM Rubric Assessment - CCJS 100 7382 Introduction to Criminal Justice (2222) - UMGC Learning Management System
https://learn.umgc.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=631928&evalObjectId=3664125&evalObjectType=5&userId=2… 3/4
Criteria Excellent Above Average
Average Below Average
Poor Criterion Score
Peer
response
content/we
ekly
involvement
in discussion
board.
/ 10
Timeliness
of peer
posts.
/ 5
10 points
Engaged in
discussion
with at least
three (3)
peers
whereby an
idea was
built upon or
refuted and
displayed
exemplary
critical
thinking.
Points
available: 9-
10
8.9 points
Engaged in
discussion
with at least
two (2) peers
whereby an
idea was
built upon or
refuted and
displayed
good critical
thinking.
Points
available: 8-
8.9
7.9 points
Engaged in
discussion
with at least
one (1) peer
whereby an
idea was
built upon or
refuted.
Points
available: 7-
7.9
6.9 points
Replies to
others but
did not built
upon or
refute peer
thoughts.
Points
available D:
6-6.9
F: 0-5.9
0 points
Did not
engage in
discussion
with peers
5 points
Posts peer
discussions
by day three
(3) of the
academic
week.
Points
available:
4.5-5
4.4 points
Posts peer
discussions
by day four
(4) of the
academic
week.
Points
available: 4-
4.4
3.9 points
Posts peer
discussions
by day five
(5) of the
academic
week.
Points
available: 3.5
-3.9
3.4 points
Posts peer
discussion
by day six (6)
of the
academic
week.
Points
available D:
3-3.4
2.9 points
Posts peer
discussion
on day six
(7) of the
academic
week. Points
available
Points
available F:
0-2.9
No Post = 0
4/30/22, 8:16 AM Rubric Assessment - CCJS 100 7382 Introduction to Criminal Justice (2222) - UMGC Learning Management System
https://learn.umgc.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=631928&evalObjectId=3664125&evalObjectType=5&userId=2… 4/4
Total / 50
Overall Score
Criteria Excellent Above Average
Average Below Average
Poor Criterion Score
Adherence
to
Discussion
Forum
Standards
and
Guidelines.
/ 1010 points
All standards
followed as
required (i.e.
APA format;
grammar;
citations;
references,
other
standards as
required).
Points
available: 9-
10
8.9 points
1 discussion
standard not
followed (i.e.
APA format;
grammar;
citations;
references,
other
standards as
required).
Points
available: 8-
8.9
7.9 points
2-3
discussion
standards
not followed
(i.e. APA
format;
grammar;
citations;
references,
other
standards as
required).
Points
available: 7-
7.9
6.9 points
4 or more
discussion
standards
not followed
(i.e. APA
format;
grammar;
citations;
references,
other
standards as
required).
Points
available D:
6-6.9
Points
available F:
0-5.9
0 points
No posts for
the
discussion.
Excellent -
Equivalent to
an A 45 points minimum
Above Average -
Equivalent to an B 40 points minimum
Average -
Equivalent to
an C 35 points minimum
Below Average -
Equivalent to an D 30 points minimum
Poor -
Equivalent to
an F 0 points minimum
