cyber security

Respond…..100 min word count

Linux has the use of a root account that must be given a password when installing software or making changes to the OS. Generally, this is a secure option, as it needs positive input to work. Windows, however, can also achieve the same results by making a separate administration account. Despite the respective administration accounts, software installation can still pose a risk. Anyone can create an application or script on both sides of the OS fence that can trick users into executing, despite being from an alleged reputable source. Linux fortunately has curated apps within application stores or repositories, and the open-source nature of Linux means that anyone can review the code if they understand what they are looking for. Windows however a much more widely-used OS is; therefore, it will be popular for attackers given its larger user base (Poland, n.d.).

Most users just want their computer to work, without having to spend too much time configuring files and solving technical problems. Windows accommodates this; it automates as many functions as possible for the user, which gives malware a chance to sneak in. According to Chad Perrin of TechRepublic (as cited in Poland, n.d.), When the user opens this file, instead of running Word, Windows follows the execution cues in the file. Another example he provides is of malware that runs when a user inserts removable media; such malware takes advantage of Windows' autorun feature (Poland, n.d.).

Poland. A. (n.d.). Differences between Linux Security and Windows Security. Retrieved from https://smallbusiness.chron.com/differences-between-linux-security-windows-security-79959.html