mini case
Benchmark – Mini Case 4 1
Benchmark – Mini Case 4
a) Legal Rights and Privileges of Common Stockholders
Benchmark – Mini Case 4 2
Shaner, (2017) states that common stockholders are the real owners of the company,
and as such they have certain rights and privileges. Common stockholders have the right to
share company's earnings equally on a per-share basis. In the event of liquidation, they have
claim on assets that remain after meeting the obligation to accrued taxes, salary and wages,
creditors including bondholders and preferred stockholders. Common stockholders also control
the firm through their right to elect the company's board of directors, that appoints
management. They possess preemptive right which is a privilege for buying a specified number
of shares of the company's stocks before the stocks are offered to outsiders for sale. They also
can attend annual general meetings to cast vote or use a proxy which is a legal document given
to one person for the authority to cast vote and represent on behalf of others. Each share of
stock has one vote for each director at the general meeting.
b) Free Cash Flow (FCF)
Free cash Flow is the cash a company produces through its operations, less the cost of
expenditures on working capital or assets and dividends during the same period, its cash left
after a company pays for its operating expenses and capital expenditures. It’s an important
indicator of how efficient a company is at generating cash and paying its expenditures.
Investors use free cash flow to measure whether a company will have enough cash, after
funding operations and capital expenditures, to pay investors through dividends and share buy-
backs (Gul, 2001).
Weighted Average Cost of Capital
Weighted average cost of capital (WACC) is a calculation of a firm's cost of capital in
which each category of capital that is common shares, preferred shares, bonds, and any other
long-term debt, is proportionately weighted by its percentage of total capital and they are added
together. The purpose of WACC is to determine the cost of each part of the company’s capital
structure based on the proportion of equity, debt, and preferred stock it has (Miller, 2009).
Benchmark – Mini Case 4 3
Free Cash Flow Valuation Model
Free cash flow valuation method is based on the operating cash flows coming in after
deducting the capital expenditures, which are the costs of maintaining the asset base. This cash
flow is taken before the interest payments to debt holders in order to value the total firm.
Example, factoring in equity, would provide the growing value to equity holders. Discounting
any cash flows requires a discount rate, and in this case, it is the cost of financing projects at
the firm, hence the weighted average cost of capital (WACC) is used for this discount rate. The
operating free cash flow is then discounted at this cost of capital rate using three potential
growth scenarios which are, no growth, constant growth, and changing growth rate (Gul, 2001).
c) Company Value and Claim Value Pie Charts
d) Formula for The Present Value of Expected Free Cash Flows, Discounted at WACC
OFCF=EBIT×(1−T)+D−CAPEX−D×wc−D×a
Value of the firm=OFCF1÷(k−g)
where:
EBIT=earnings before interest and taxes wc=working capita
T=tax rate la=any other assets
D=depreciation g=expected growth rate in OFCF
OFCF1=operating free cash flow k=discount rate, in this case WACC
References
Company Value
Shareholders
Net Debts
Claims on a company value
Debt Holders Preffered Stockholders
Common Shareholders
Benchmark – Mini Case 4 4
Gul, F. A., & Tsui, J. S. (2001). Free cash flow, debt monitoring, and audit pricing: Further
evidence on the role of director equity ownership. Auditing: A Journal of Practice &
Theory, 20(2), 71-84.
Miller, R. A. (2009). The weighted average cost of capital is not quite right. The Quarterly
Review of Economics and Finance, 49(1), 128-138.
Shaner, M. W. (2017). Confronting New Market Realities: Implications for Stockholders
Rights to Vote, Sell, and Sue. Okla. L. Rev., 70, 1.
Course Code Class Code Assignment Title Total Points
FIN-650 FIN-650-O500 Benchmark - Mini Case 4 30.0
Criteria Percentage Unsatisfactory (0.00%) Less than Satisfactory (74.00%) Satisfactory (79.00%) Good (87.00%) Excellent (100.00%) Comments Points Earned
Content 100.0%
Question A 15.0% Answer to question A is not included. Answer to question A is incomplete or incorrect.
Answer to question A is included but lacks explanation and
relevant supporting details.
Answer to question A is complete and includes relevant
supporting details.
Answer to question A is extremely thorough and supported
with substantial relevant details. 4.50/4.50
Question B 15.0% Answer to question B is not included. Answer to question B is incomplete or incorrect.
Answer to question B is included but lacks explanation and
relevant supporting details.
Answer to question B is complete and includes relevant
supporting details.
Answer to question B is extremely thorough and supported
with substantial relevant details. 3.92/4.50
Question C 15.0% Answer to question C is not included. Answer to question C is incomplete or incorrect.
Answer to question C is included but lacks explanation and
relevant supporting details.
Answer to question C is complete and includes relevant
supporting details.
Answer to question C is extremely thorough and supported
with substantial relevant details. 4.50/4.50
Question D 15.0% Answer to question D is not included. Answer to question D is incomplete or incorrect.
Answer to question D is included but lacks explanation and
relevant supporting details.
Answer to question D is complete and includes relevant
supporting details.
Answer to question D is extremely thorough and supported
with substantial relevant details. 3.56/4.50
Ethical Issues and Standards (C4.2; C10.2) 30.0%
Report discussing potential ethical issues that may arise
from expansion and opportunities to promote ethical
standards within the organization is not included.
Report discussing potential ethical issues that may arise
from expansion and opportunities to promote ethical
standards within the organization is incomplete or
incorrect.
Report discussing potential ethical issues that may arise
from expansion and opportunities to promote ethical
standards within the organization is included but lacks
explanation and supporting details and examples.
Report discussing potential ethical issues that may arise
from expansion and opportunities to promote ethical
standards within the organization is complete and includes
supporting details and examples.
Report discussing potential ethical issues that may arise
from expansion and opportunities to promote ethical
standards within the organization is extremely thorough
and includes substantial supporting details and examples.
You need a commentary on review of
ethical standards; you need more specific
discussion on proactive strategies to
explain opportunities to promote ethical
standards within your organization. 0.00/9.00
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling,
punctuation, grammar, language use) 10.0%
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede
communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or
sentence construction is used.
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the
reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word
choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not
varied.
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are
not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied
sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are
employed.
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few
may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective
sentence structures and figures of speech.
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic
English. 2.22/3.00
Total Weightage 100% 18.69/30.0