social psychology reflection paper 4 pages

profileChae
W2_SocialSelf.pptx

The Social Self

Three Motivations in Social Psychology

Motivation for certainty  We need to feel like we understand our environment

Motivation for esteem  We need to feel competent and proud of ourselves

Motivation for belonging  We need pleasant and stable social connections

Three Motivations in Social Psychology

Motivation for certainty

Motivation for esteem

Motivation for belonging

The way we view our self-concept is driven largely by these

Self-concept: A system of knowledge and beliefs about our personal qualities

Self-Concept

Me

My likes

My values

My skills

My traits

My feelings

Sources of Knowledge

Write a list of 5 subjective traits that define you

I am outgoing (subjective)

I am a student (objective)

These can include your values, likes, talents, personality traits, aspirations, etc.

Next to each one: How do you know?

Knowledge Through Behavior

Self-perception theory  We learn about ourselves by watching our own behaviors

I am talking in front of a classroom, so I must be outgoing

Our behaviors are more telling when:

They are freely chosen

There is no reward

Knowledge Through Behavior

Children asked to draw with new markers for 20 minutes

Condition 1: Promised a “Good player” certificate

2 weeks later, played with markers 8% of free-time

Condition 2: Not promised a certificate, but surprised with one

2 weeks later, played with markers 16% of free-time

Condition 3: Not promised a certificate, not given one

2 weeks later, played with markers 16% of free-time

Knowledge Through Behavior

Why?

Condition 1: I played with these before, but it was for a certificate, so I don’t actually like them

Condition 2 + 3: I played with these before without the promise of a certificate, so I must like them!

Knowledge Through Thoughts/Feelings

Similarly, we use our thoughts and feelings to define who we are

I am calm in this classroom right now, so I must be outgoing

Knowledge Through Feelings/Thoughts

Researchers put a female surveyor in a national park to approach men

Condition 1: Men approached in an open field/ picnic area

Condition 2: Men approached as they crossed a swaying, unstable bridge

A second researcher approaches after and asks how attractive that female was

Men in condition 2 reported being more attracted to her

Knowledge Through Feelings/Thoughts

Conclusion:

Being on the bridge elevated heartrate, sweating, and attention

Men took this to mean attraction

Knowledge From Others’ Reactions

We understand who we are through the ways others treat us/react to us.

My brother asked me to talk at his wedding, so I must be outgoing

We respond to both obvious and subtle information from others:

Obvious: Others tell me I am creative, people are impressed by what I create

Subtle: My brother asks me to help design his wedding invitations

Works more with under-developed self-concepts or new domains

Knowledge from Social Comparisons

We judge who we are by how we compare ourselves with others

I get a bit nervous before being in front of a large crowd, but my peers get incredibly nervous, so I must be outgoing

We feel different about the same traits when given different social comparisons

Knowledge from Social Comparisons

Downward social comparisons  Comparing ourselves to someone less skilled/fortunate

Benefits: Boosts confidence, self-esteem

Drawbacks: Bad for improvement

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c3gGkiWSzvg

Upward social comparisons  Comparing ourselves to someone more skilled/fortunate

Benefits: Motivating (at times)

Drawbacks: Distressing, threatens the self

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HSPYgwP9R84

In Summary

We build our self-concept from several sources, including

Our own behaviors

Our own thoughts/feelings

Others’ reactions

Social comparisons

Multiple Selves

Multiple Selves

We are made up of multiple diverse “selves”

Sometimes these selves can be contradictory

Alejandro

Student

Teacher

Political activist

Father

Balancing the Self

An overly diverse, contradictory self-concept can be distressing

Cause feelings of hypocrisy, conflict, lack of identity

An overly narrow, singular self-concept can be instable

We need other identities to “fall back on” when one fails

An ideal self-concept is diverse, multi-faceted, but rooted in core values

Cognitive Dissonance

Protecting the self

Positive Self-Concepts

We are motivated to understand ourselves and have a strong sense of self

But

We want to feel good/proud about that sense of self

VS

Cognitive Dissonance

Cognitive Dissonance  A distressing state that arises when we feel in conflict with a desired/perceived sense of self

I am X

Z is true for me

Z is not true for X’s

Cognitive Dissonance

I cheat on a statistics test

I am honest

I cheated on the test

Honest people don’t cheat

Cognitive Dissonance

I get cut from the soccer team

I’m good at soccer

I didn’t make the team

Good players make teams

Festinger & Carlsmith’s cognitive dissonance study

Had participants complete a boring task for an hour

Asked them to be an “assistant”  If asked, tell the next participant this was fun

Payed either $1 or $20 for being an assistant

Asked to report on how fun they actually found it

Festinger & Carlsmith (1959)

Festinger & Carlsmith (1959)

I am a good person

A good person is honest

I just lied to that participant

Resolving Cognitive Dissonance

We are highly skilled and motivated to resolve cognitive dissonance

We find ways to satisfy both our need for certainty (feeling like we are making an accurate judgement) and our need for esteem (avoiding feelings of guilt/self-doubt)

Resolving Cognitive Dissonance

Three broad strategies to resolve:

Reappraise the situation

Create a new interpretation for the situation

Cheating is not bad in cases like this

Michael Jordan was cut from his team

Resolving Cognitive Dissonance

Three broad strategies to resolve:

Reappraise the situation

Blame external sources

The teacher made the test too hard

I had an injury

Resolving Cognitive Dissonance

Three broad strategies to resolve:

Reappraise the situation

Blame external sources

Restructure self-concept

I’m not a very honest person

I’ve always been more about academics

This approach is rare, only works for less important traits

Festinger & Carlsmith (1959)

Participants were offered $1 or $20 to lie to a confederate about how fun the study was

DV: How fun they later reported the study to be

$20: The study was rated very negatively

$1: The study was rated as enjoyable, fun

$20 could blame external sources (I knew it was a lie, but they paid well)

$1 could not (I knew it was a lie and I did it for a single dollar?!)

They reappraised the situation

Resolving Cognitive Dissonance

For each of the scenarios, please describe how this is an example of cognitive dissonance (what is the tension?) and one way it can be resolved

I repeatedly hear news stories about how smoking is bad, but I regularly smoke cigarettes anyway

I was faced with a difficult decision between two colleges I wanted to attend, and eventually choose College A. After some time, though, I start realizing that College B might have been a better choice.

I am cheating on my romantic partner despite having a happy relationship

Self-Esteem

Self-esteem

We need a way to monitor our self-concept and detect when we are failing to live up to it

This monitoring system is our self-esteem

Self-esteem: the overall positive/negative evaluation of our self-concept

Our self-esteem comes from a variety of different sources

Physical Appearance

We derive our self-esteem from our physical appearance, and how that matches societal norms

Social Roles/ Skills

We draw our self-esteem from the important roles and talents we have, and our ability to be good at those roles

Personality Traits

We draw our self-esteem from how our personality aligns with the traits we see as desirable

These traits, like a lot of other things, are socially ascribed