Assigment .Apa seven . All instructions attached.

profilebutterflyl
w11Assgn2_Garcia_M.docx

Synthesis Process and Recommendations Tool

Marta Lilian Garcia

Foun Essen Doctor Nurs Practic, Walden University

Evidence Based Practice

Dr. Maria Revel

February 7, 2025

2

© 2017 The Johns Hopkins Hospital/ Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing

Date:

EBP Question: In registered nurses working in high-stress healthcare settings (P), how does the implementation of evidence-based burnout reduction strategies such as mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) programs and improved nurse-to-patient ratios (I) compared to current reactive wellness initiatives (C) impact nurse retention rates and job satisfaction (O) over six months (T)?

Article Number

Author and Date

Evidence Type

Sample, Sample Size, Setting

Findings That Help Answer the EBP Question

Observable Measures

Limitations

Evidence Level, Quality

1.

Othman, S. Y., Hassan, N. I., & Mohamed, A. M. (2023) ​

Quasi-experimental study

The study was conducted in three hospitals in El-Beheira, Egypt, involving 60 nurses working in intensive care units (ICUs) during the COVID-19 pandemic. 30 nurses were randomly assigned to an intervention group (30) receiving 8 mindfulness-based intervention (MBI) sessions and a control group (30) getting no intervention. The study setting was high-stress ICU environments, where nurses experienced heavy workloads, emotional distress, and ethical dilemmas.

The study found that an 8-week MBI training reduced ICU nurses' emotional weariness, depersonalization, and burnout. In the MBI group, post-intervention emotional tiredness scores reduced from 32.43 ± 8.87 to 15.47 ± 4.44, while the control group showed no meaningful changes. In the MBI group, self-compassion scores increased from 79.00 ± 4.57 to 94.50 ± 3.83. The study shows that mindfulness-based therapies improve nurse well-being and resilience, which may improve job satisfaction and retention in high-stress environments.

· Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) to assess emotional exhaustion and depersonalization

· Five-Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ) to measure mindfulness levels

· Self-Compassion Scale to evaluate changes in self-compassion

This study solely covered Egypt, limiting its applicability to other healthcare systems with differing staffing and pressures. Additionally, small sample size (60 participants) and short follow-up (post-intervention only) do not analyze long-term effects. Furthermore, the study used self-reported measurements, which may have been biased by social desirability or participant expectations.

Level: II (Quasi-experimental study)

Quality: High

2.

Lin, L., He, G., Yan, J., Gu, C., & Xie, J. (2019) ​

Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT)

This study was conducted in two tertiary-level general hospitals in Dongguan, South China, with a total of 110 registered nurses. They were randomly assigned to the intervention group (55 nurses getting an 8-week modified mindfulness-based stress reduction [MBSR] program) or the control group (55 nurses receiving no intervention but given the program after the trial). In high-stress general hospitals, nurses experienced workload-related stress, emotional weariness, and shift-related fatigue.

The study showed that the modified 8-week MBSR treatment reduced stress and negative affect and improved resilience and positive affect among nurses. Stress levels dropped considerably in the intervention group, and coping and emotional regulation improved. Job satisfaction did not improve immediately after the intervention, but patterns suggested a long-term effect. These data suggest that MBSR treatments reduce nurse burnout and emotional discomfort, which may improve retention and job satisfaction.

• Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) to assess stress levels • Used PANAS to assess emotional reactions. • Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) to evaluate resilience • Job Satisfaction Survey (JSS) to assess work satisfaction

The study was limited to two hospitals in South China, making it less generalizable to other healthcare settings. The three-month follow-up may not capture long-term nurse retention impacts. The study also did not account for external factors like staffing or policy changes that may have affected stress and work satisfaction.

Level: I (Randomized Controlled Trial - RCT)

Quality: High

3.

McHugh, M. D., Aiken, L. H., Sloane, D. M., Windsor, C., Douglas, C., & Yates, P. (2021)​

Prospective Panel Study (Quasi-Experimental Design)

The study analyzed data from 55 hospitals in Queensland, Australia, comparing 27 hospitals that implemented minimum nurse-to-patient ratio policies against 28 hospitals that did not. Survey data from 17,010 hospital medical-surgical nurses and 231,902 baseline and 257,253 post-implementation patients were included. The study focused on general medical-surgical units, where staffing levels affect patient outcomes, nurse burnout, and job satisfaction​.

The implementation of minimum nurse-to-patient ratio policies resulted in significantly lower mortality rates, reduced readmissions, and shorter lengths of stay in intervention hospitals compared to control hospitals. Hospitals with greater staffing had lower burnout and higher job satisfaction, suggesting that better staffing policies boost nurse retention. The study revealed that exceeding safe staffing levels by one patient per nurse increased mortality risk, readmissions, and job dissatisfaction​.

· Nurse-to-patient ratios (hospital-reported and survey-verified)

· 30-day patient mortality rates (hospital records)

· 7-day readmission rates (hospital records)

· Nurse job satisfaction surveys (self-reported)

The study was conducted only in Queensland, Australia, which may limit global applicability. The analysis also ignored hospital-level factors including leadership changes and policy revisions that may have affected outcomes. The study also included self-reported nurse satisfaction data, which may have introduced bias.

Level: II (Quasi-Experimental Study with Large Sample Size)

Quality: High

4.

Talebiazar, N., Salamat, E., Abbasi, M., Azizi, N., Goli, R., Faraji, N., Bagheri, M., Amiri, N., & Kazemi, S. (2024)

Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT)

This study included 60 geriatric ward nurses from three Urmia, West Azerbaijan province, Iran facilities. After random assignment, 30 participants were assigned to intervention and 30 to control groups. Eligibility required at least six months of work experience, a bachelor's degree in nursing, and no recent exposure to severe stress or prior MBSR training. Nurses in high-pressure geriatric wards cared for elderly patients with chronic diseases, heavy workloads, and end-of-life care.

The study found that mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) training reduced occupational stress and burnout in nurses. Key stressors include workload, disagreements with physicians and nurses, lack of support resources, and treatment uncertainty improved in the intervention group (p < 0.001). These data suggest that MBSR may improve nurse retention and work satisfaction in high-stress contexts like geriatric wards by reducing burnout.

The study used validated scales to measure occupational stress and burnout with subscales for death and dying, workload, and conflicts. The statistical analysis showed post-intervention stress decrease.

The study's small sample size and limited geographical scope limit generalizability. Furthermore, the short-term assessment period did not account for long-term retention or job satisfaction effects. Despite blinding efforts, participants knowing the intervention assignment may cause biases.

Level I evidence (RCT)

Quality: High

EBP Question: In registered nurses working in high-stress healthcare settings (P), how does the implementation of evidence-based burnout reduction strategies such as mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) programs and improved nurse-to-patient ratios (I) compared to current reactive wellness initiatives (C) impact nurse retention rates and job satisfaction (O) over six months (T)?

Category (Level Type)

Total Number of Sources/Level

Overall Quality Rating

Synthesis of Findings

Evidence That Answers the EBP Question

Level I

· Experimental study

· Randomized controlled trial (RCT)

· Systematic review of RCTs with or without meta-analysis

· Explanatory mixed method design that includes only a Level I quaNtitative study

2

High

Both articles show that mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) reduces occupational stress and burnout in high-stress nurses. MBSR may increase job satisfaction and retention by statistically improving important stressors such workload, disputes with colleagues, lack of support, and treatment ambiguity, as shown in by Talebiazar et al. (2024). Similarly, Lin et al. (2019) found that 8 weeks of MBSR reduced stress, negative affect, and emotional pain and improved resilience and coping skills. Although job satisfaction did not instantly improve in the study findings suggest a long-term favorable influence on nurse retention and satisfaction. The results cumulatively justify MBSR interventions in high-stress healthcare settings to combat nurse burnout and emotional distress. By decreasing tension and strengthening coping, MBSR works on important factors of burnout and dissatisfaction. As an effective, evidence-based practice, therefore, this kind of intervention is suitable for job and nurse satisfaction and retention.

Level II

· Quasi-experimental studies

· Systematic review of a combination of RCTs and quasi-experimental studies, or quasi- experimental studies only, with or without meta-analysis

· Explanatory mixed method design that includes only a Level II quaNtitative study

2

High

Othman et al. (2023) and McHugh et al. (2021) findings show convincing arguments that lead to the development of strategies to tackle nurse burnout and nurture job satisfaction in stressful working environments. In Othman et al. (2023), 8 weeks of an MBI alleviated emotional tiredness, depersonalization, burnout, and improved self-compassion in ICU nurses. These gains add to resilience, well-being and retention of the job. McHugh et al. (2021) examined data from 55 hospitals to find that minimum nurse-to-patient ratio policies reduce burnout and elevate job satisfaction by decreasing workload stress and generating favorable patient outcomes.

Both studies present very supportive studies regarding the efficacy of mindfulness-based interventions and systemic work load adjustments as supported evidence-based strategies toward a reduction of nurse burnout and better job satisfaction. On a personal level, Othman et al. (2023) stressed the benefits associated with mindfulness, while in terms of systemic effects of nurse to patient ratio rules McHugh et al. (2021) have stressed. The implications from these findings are that individual and organizational interventions could improve nurse retention and improve work satisfaction in high-stress HC settings.

Level III

· Nonexperimental study

· Systematic review of a combination of RCTs, quasi-experimental and nonexperimental studies, or nonexperimental studies only, with or without meta- analysis

· QuaLitative study or meta- synthesis

· Exploratory, convergent, or multiphasic mixed-methods studies

· Explanatory mixed method design that includes only a level III QuaNtitative study

Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice

Appendix H

Synthesis Process and Recommendations Tool

Category (Level Type)

Total Number of Sources/Level

Overall Quality Rating

Synthesis of Findings

Evidence That Answers the EBP Question

Level IV

· Opinions of respected authorities and/or reports of nationally recognized expert committees or consensus panels based on scientific evidence

Level V

· Evidence obtained from literature or integrative reviews, quality improvement, program evaluation, financial evaluation, or case reports

· Opinion of nationally recognized expert(s) based on experiential evidence

Based on your synthesis, which of the following four pathways to translation represents the overall strength of the evidence?

❑Strong, compelling evidence, consistent results: Solid indication for a practice change is indicated.

Good and consistent evidence: Consider pilot of change or further investigation.

Good but conflicting evidence: No indication for practice change; consider further investigation for new evidence or develop a research study.

Little or no evidence: No indication for practice change; consider further investigation for new evidence, develop a research study, or discontinue project.

If you selected either the first option or the second option, continue. If not, STOP , translation is not indicated.

Recommendations based on evidence synthesis and selected translation pathway

· Mindfulness-Based Interventions (MBIs): Implement evidence-based programs like MBSR or MBI to address individual stress and burnout. These therapies strengthen resilience, emotional control, and self-compassion, improving nurse well-being and job satisfaction over time.

· Optimal Nurse-to-Patient Ratios: Adopt staffing regulations that assure adequate ratios to reduce workload, burnout, and job satisfaction.

· Integrated Approach: Combine MBIs with systemic changes for maximum impact. This dual approach supports nurse retention and care quality by addressing individual and organizational pressures. Pilot initiatives can improve implementation for wider use.

Consider the following as you examine fit:

Are the recommendations:

· Compatible with the unit/departmental/organizational cultural values or norms?

· Consistent with unit/departmental/organizational assumptions, structures, attitudes, beliefs, and/or practices?

· Consistent with the unit/departmental/organizational priorities?

Consider the following as you examine feasibility:

· Can we do what they did in our work environment?

· Are the following supports available?

· Resources

· Funding

· Approval from administration and clinical leaders

· Stakeholder support

· Is it likely that the recommendations can be implemented within the unit/department/organization?

Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice

Appendix H

Synthesis Process and Recommendations Tool

© 2017 The Johns Hopkins Hospital/ Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing

Directions for Use of This Form

Purpose of form

Use this form to compile the results of the individual evidence appraisal to answer the EBP question. The pertinent findings for each level of evidence are synthesized, and a quality rating is assigned to each level.

Total number of sources per level

Record the number of sources of evidence for each level.

Overall quality rating

Summarize the overall quality of evidence for each level. Use Appendix D to rate the quality of evidence.

Synthesis of findings: evidence that answers the EBP question

· Include only findings from evidence of A or B quality.

· Include only statements that directly answer the EBP question.

· Summarize findings within each level of evidence.

· Record article number(s) from individual evidence summary in parentheses next to each statement so that the source of the finding is easy to identify.

Develop recommendations based on evidence synthesis and the selected translation pathway

Review the synthesis of findings and determine which of the following four pathways to translation represents the overall strength of the evidence:

· Strong, compelling evidence, consistent results: Solid indication for a practice change.

· Good and consistent evidence: Consider pilot of change or further investigation.

· Good but conflicting evidence: No indication for practice change; consider further investigation for new evidence or develop a research study.

· Little or no evidence: No indication for practice change; consider further investigation for new evidence, develop a research study, or discontinue the project.

Fit and feasibility

Even when evidence is strong and of high quality, it may not be appropriate to implement a change in practice. It is crucial to examine feasibility that considers the resources available, the readiness for change, and the balance between risk and benefit. Fit refers to the compatibility of the proposed change with the organization’s mission, goals, objectives, and priorities. A change that does not fit within the organizational priorities will be less likely to receive leadership and financial support, making success difficult. Implementing processes with a low likelihood of success wastes valuable time and resources on efforts that produce negligible benefits.

References

Lin, L., He, G., Yan, J., Gu, C., & Xie, J. (2019). The Effects of a Modified Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction Program for Nurses: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Workplace Health & Safety, 67(3), 111–122. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165079918801633

McHugh, M., Aiken, L., Sloane, D., Windsor, C., Douglas, C., & Yates, P. (2021). Effects of nurse-to-patient ratio legislation on nurse staffing and patient mortality, readmissions, and length of stay: a prospective study in a panel of hospitals. The Lancet, 397(10288), 1905–1913. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00768-6

Othman, S. Y., Hassan, N. I., & Mohamed, A. M. (2023). Effectiveness of mindfulness-based interventions on burnout and self-compassion among critical care nurses caring for patients with COVID-19: a quasi-experimental study. BMC Nursing, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-023-01466-8

Talebiazar, N., Salamat, E., Abbasi, M., Azizi, N., Goli, R., Faraji, N., Bagheri, M., Amiri, N., & Kazemi, S. (2024). The impact of mindfulness-based stress reduction training on the occupational stress and burnout experienced by nurses in geriatric wards? A randomized controlled trial. Geriatric Nursing, 58, 373–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gerinurse.2024.05.034