Please read all instructions carefully!

profileeko
VariousStyles.pptx

SUPPORTING

Praise, listen, and facilitate

For people who have

High Competence

Variable Commitment

EMPOWERING

Turn over responsibility for day-to-day decision making

For people who have

High Competence

High Commitment

COACHING

Direct and support

For people who have

Some Competence

Some Commitment

DIRECTING

Structure, control, and supervise

For people who have

Low Competence

High Commitment

Low DIRECTIVE BEHAVIOR High

Low SUPPORTIVE BEHAVIOR High

DOMINATOR

High on task, low on people

Big boss. Runs the show

Sets high expectations

Concerned with results

Suppresses disagreements

Gets things done

Competitive and confident

Doesn’t listen to others

AVOIDER

Low on task and people

Keeps a low profile

Hesitant and cautions

Doesn’t want to make mistakes

Follows tried and true

Avoids conflict/disagreements

Doesn’t provide direction

Carries out what others want

COLLABORATOR

High on tank and people

Sets high expectations

Concerned with results

Involves people in decisions

Deals openly with concerns

Seeks win-win solutions

Encourages responsibility

Interdependent

ACCOMMODATOR

Low on task, high on people

Warm and friendly

Keeps people happy

Smoothes over conflicts

Easy going, overlooks mistakes

Lets others decide

Loose structure

Low EMPATHY High

Low ASSERTIVENESS High

Strengths Weaknesses
Commanding
Goal oriented Emphasis on bottom line Makes quick decisions Willing to take risks Pursues big, risky challenges Makes abrupt decisions Lack of esprit de corps Lack of communication
Innovating
Idea oriented Emphasis on people Entertaining, fun Willing to take risks Lots of ideas, goals Lack of clear priorities Difficulty with follow through Hard to gain commitment
Deliberating
Fact and process oriented Emphasis on precision Stresses academic credentials Lots of quality control Linear thinking Unwilling to take risks Tends to miss deadlines Blind to the big picture
Caring
Relationship oriented Emphasis on team Fun, warm, friendly Loyal to the cause Avoids conflict, change Makes decision slowly, if ever Not clear about purpose or goals Tendency towards bureaucracy
Innovator Developer Activator Maximizer Stabilizer
Design Design and Build Build Build and Maintain Maintain
Bringing new ideas and original solutions to the marketplace. Thinking outside the box to solve problems Taking action on original solutions and learning along the way. Motto: Ready, aim, fire Moving forward to achieve challenging goals. Overcoming obstacles and getting things done Embracing the good of the past while making new changes. Working together with all kinds of people Keeping things running smoothly and efficiently. Creating systems that meet the highest standards of accountability
Creativity Flexibility Tenacity Diplomacy Consistency
Style Description When to Use Weaknesses
Commanding Coercive Dictatorship “Do what I say” When time is scarce or in a crisis Members can feel stifled as they are treated as workers and not asked for an opinion
Visionary Authoritative Mobilizes people towards vision “Come with me” When a new direction is needed Lacks an ability to help team members understand how they get to a goal
Affiliative Focuses on emotional needs over work needs “People come first” Best used for healing rifts and getting through stressful situations Confrontation and emotionally distressing positions can be avoided
Democratic Uses participation, listening to both the bad and the good “What do you think?” To gain valuable input from employees and to gain buy-in when there is time to do so Can be lots of listening, but very little effective action
Pacesetting Builds challenging and exciting goals for people “Do as I do, now” When the team is already highly motivated and competent Can lack emotional intelligence
Coaching Connecting corporate goals while helping people find strengths and weaknesses “Try this” When individuals need to build longer term strengths Can appear to be micromanaging
Style Definition Style Definition
Autocratic Leader is in total control of the group and task. Importance is focused at the top Laissez Faire Leader withdraws authority and influence in favor of permissiveness
Consultative Leader consults those affected by a decision. Those affected have a voice Nomothetic Leader emphasizes the requirements of the institution rather than the needs of an individual in the group
Participative Leader and group discuss and decide together. Those affected have a voice and a vote Idiographic Leader emphasized the needs of an individual rather than those of the institution
Democratic The majority opinion of the group determines the course of action Situational Appropriate approach is determined by the situation: traits of the leader and group and the task at hand