Explore the link between Financial Structures and Economic Growth
1 Variable Definition
The definitions, specific meanings and symbols of variables studied in this paper are shown in the following table.
Meaning of table x variables
|
category |
symbol |
meaning |
|
Depth |
GFDD.DI.02 |
Deposit money banks' assets to GDP (%) |
|
Stability |
GFDD.SI.01 |
Bank Z-score |
|
Other Economic |
GFDD.OE.01 |
Consumer price index (2010=100, December) |
|
Access |
GFDD.AI.03 |
Firms with a bank loan or line of credit (%) |
|
Access |
GFDD.AI.20 |
Credit card (% age 15+) |
|
Access |
GFDD.AI.23 |
Mobile phone used to pay bills (% age 15+) |
|
Access |
GFDD.AI.34 |
Investments financed by banks (%) |
|
Access |
GFDD.AI.35 |
Working capital financed by banks (%) |
|
Access |
GFDD.AM.04 |
Investments financed by equity or stock sales (%) |
2 Descriptive Statistics of Variables
Table X Descriptive Statistics
|
Variable |
Mean |
Std.Dev. |
Min |
Max |
|
gfdddi02 |
60.63444 |
43.98217 |
0.392568 |
257.224 |
|
gfddsi01 |
14.01161 |
9.067189 |
-0.451923 |
64.4264 |
|
gfddoe01 |
125.9714 |
152.6162 |
94.5781 |
4665.79 |
|
gfddai03 |
34.21103 |
17.61162 |
3.8 |
79.6 |
|
gfddai20 |
17.84324 |
20.16423 |
0 |
82.5848 |
|
gfddai23 |
4.326267 |
5.93272 |
0 |
37.1049 |
|
gfddai34 |
14.8875 |
8.954845 |
0.8 |
38.5 |
|
gfddai35 |
11.59926 |
6.279308 |
0.8 |
30.1 |
|
gfddam04 |
4.616667 |
3.429408 |
0 |
15.4 |
It can be seen from the above table that the standard deviation of the consumer price index is the largest among all variables, which indicates that the consumer price index of different banks has a great variation range, with a value of 152.6162.According to the dependent variable, deposit money banks' assets to GDP, the maximum value is 257.224, the minimum, 0.392568, the standard deviation, 43.98217, and the average, 60.63444. With respect to the variable Bank Z-score, its maximum value is 64.4264, the minimum, -0.451923, the standard deviation, 9.067189, and the average, 14.01161.
3 Correlation analysis of variables
In order to study the factors that affect the performance of banks, the variables are selected from access, depth, efficiency, other, other economic and stability. Before the formal regression analysis, the correlation analysis was carried out to explore the correlation between independent variables and the linear correlation between explanatory variables and independent variables. The results are shown in the following table. Comment by TYT: 原文直接给的英文“other, other economic”就直接挪过来,确定下是不是两个other Comment by TYT: 这里是不是少了表,记得插入
Correlation analysis mainly studies the correlation between variables. The range of correlation coefficient is between-1 and 1. The larger the absolute value, the closer the correlation between variables is. Qiu Haozheng (2006) put forward a detailed classification method of correlation coefficient, ∣r∣=1, which is completely correlated;∣r∣≤0.70 <0.99, highly correlated;0.40 ≤∣r∣<0.69, moderately correlated;0.10≤∣r∣<0.39, low correlation;∣r∣< 0.10, weak or irrelevant.
Generally, correlation analysis is needed before regression analysis to preliminarily judge the relationship between explanatory variables and interpreted variables. Therefore, pearson correlation analysis is used to analyze the linear correlation between variables. The specific results are shown in Table 2.
It can be seen from the above table that most of the correlation coefficients between independent variables are less than 0.5, indicating that the correlation degree between independent variables is small, and the correlation coefficients between dependent variables and independent variables are only individually greater than 0.5, so we should explore the causal relationship between independent variables and dependent variables through regression analysis.
Table X Correlation Analysis Table 1
|
|
gfdddi02 |
gfddoe01 |
gfddai03 |
gfddai20 |
gfddai23 |
gfddai34 |
gfddai35 |
gfddam04 |
|
gfdddi02 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gfddoe01 |
-0.2059 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gfddai03 |
0.4155 |
-0.4226 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
gfddai20 |
0.8827 |
-0.2007 |
0.3735 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
gfddai23 |
0.7977 |
-0.2151 |
0.4077 |
0.9556 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
gfddai34 |
0.3473 |
-0.2402 |
0.6735 |
0.1696 |
0.261 |
1 |
|
|
|
gfddai35 |
0.2802 |
-0.3179 |
0.8555 |
0.1077 |
0.1196 |
0.7283 |
1 |
|
|
gfddam04 |
-0.2372 |
0.0276 |
-0.1422 |
-0.2234 |
-0.4136 |
-0.3086 |
-0.0694 |
1 |
Table X Correlation Analysis Table 2
|
|
gfddsi01 |
gfddoe01 |
gfddai03 |
gfddai20 |
gfddai23 |
gfddai34 |
gfddai35 |
gfddam04 |
|
gfddsi01 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gfddoe01 |
0.1032 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gfddai03 |
0.7779 |
-0.4219 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
gfddai20 |
0.0181 |
-0.1988 |
0.3547 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
gfddai23 |
0.8177 |
-0.2196 |
0.4216 |
0.9452 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
gfddai34 |
-0.0528 |
-0.2378 |
0.6428 |
0.1705 |
0.2547 |
1 |
|
|
|
gfddai35 |
0.2082 |
-0.3195 |
0.8652 |
0.0954 |
0.1474 |
0.688 |
1 |
|
|
gfddam04 |
0.1769 |
0.0241 |
-0.1212 |
-0.2246 |
-0.4021 |
-0.3101 |
-0.0481 |
1 |
4 regression analysis
4.1 regression analysis
In order to explore the specific influence relationship, the following regression model was constructed.
|
gfdddi02 |
Coef. |
robust.std.err |
t |
P>|t| |
[95% Conf.Interval |
|
|
gfddoe01 |
-0.0174635 |
0.0857947 |
-0.2 |
0.847 |
-0.2380057 |
0.2030787 |
|
gfddai03 |
-0.4269511 |
0.8353712 |
-0.51 |
0.631 |
-2.574341 |
1.720439 |
|
gfddai20 |
6.339178 |
1.794365 |
3.53 |
0.017 |
1.726615 |
10.95174 |
|
gfddai23 |
-20.99733 |
10.40286 |
-2.02 |
0.01 |
-47.73873 |
5.744067 |
|
gfddai34 |
0.9361124 |
0.7217221 |
1.3 |
0.251 |
-0.9191335 |
2.791358 |
|
gfddai35 |
0.6808618 |
1.724007 |
0.39 |
0.709 |
-3.750839 |
5.112562 |
|
gfddam04 |
-2.124557 |
1.569369 |
-1.35 |
0.234 |
-6.158748 |
1.909633 |
|
_cons |
36.9883 |
20.51093 |
1.8 |
0.31 |
-15.73672 |
89.71331 |
|
F(7, 5) = 7.90 |
||||||
|
Prob>F=0 |
||||||
|
R-squared = 0.9171 |
||||||
|
Adj R-squared = 0.8011 |
||||||
|
Root MSE = 16.011 |
The R square of the model is 0.9171, and the adjusted r square is 0.8011, indicating that the independent variable can explain 80.11% of the dependent variable, and the model fitting effect is very good. And the statistical value of f is 7.9, and the test result of f test is significant, that is, at least one independent variable has significant influence on the dependent variable, and the model is meaningful.
In addition, in the t test of regression coefficient, because the p values of credit card and mobile phone used to pay bills are less than 0.05, the regression coefficients of credit card and mobile phone used to pay bills have passed the significance test, which shows that they have significant influence on the dependent variable.
The regression equation obtained is
Y=36.9883+gfddoe01*-0.0174635+gfddai03*-0.4269511+gfddai20*6.339178+gfddai23*-20.99733+gfddai34*0.9361124+gfddai35*0.6808618+gfddam04*-2.124557
4.2 Robustness analysis
To test the robustness of the above model, the dependent variable is replaced by Bank Z-score from Deposit money banks' assets to GDP, and the regression results are as follows. It can be seen from the table that the p value of credit card and mobile phone used to pay bills is still less than 0.05 in the equation, which indicates that credit card and mobile phone used to pay bills have significant influence on the dependent variable, and the robustness of the model has been verified.
|
gfddsi01 |
Coef. |
robust.std.err |
t |
P>|t| |
[95% Conf.Interval |
|
|
gfddoe01 |
0.0175336 |
0.0358044 |
0.49 |
0.642 |
-0.0700767 |
0.1051439 |
|
gfddai03 |
-0.4530194 |
0.3455447 |
-1.31 |
0.238 |
-1.298537 |
0.3924981 |
|
gfddai20 |
-1.096349 |
0.588331 |
-1.86 |
0.012 |
-2.535943 |
0.3432448 |
|
gfddai23 |
7.385612 |
3.372901 |
2.19 |
0.071 |
-0.86758 |
15.6388 |
|
gfddai34 |
-0.2145848 |
0.2747104 |
-0.78 |
0.464 |
-0.8867769 |
0.4576072 |
|
gfddai35 |
1.107059 |
0.6637819 |
1.67 |
0.146 |
-0.5171564 |
2.731275 |
|
gfddam04 |
0.9514052 |
0.6042903 |
1.57 |
0.166 |
-0.52724 |
2.43005 |
|
_cons |
1.895037 |
8.14141 |
0.23 |
0.824 |
-18.02628 |
21.81635 |
|
F(7, 6) = 1.06 |
||||||
|
Prob>F= 0.0185 |
||||||
|
R-squared = 0.5525 |
||||||
|
Adj R-squared = 0.0304 |
||||||
|
Root MSE = 6.6972 |